Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: An evaluation of growth rates and seasonal effects among students served in general and special education

School Psychology Review

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 447-462

  Christ, Theodore J ^a   Silberglitt, Benjamin ^b   Yeo, Seungsoo ^c   Cormier, Damien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Technology and Information Educational Services   (United States)

^c Korean Women's Development Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649300702     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AIMSweb. (2002). Reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) standard oral reading fluency assessment passages. Retrieved October 2003, from http://www.aimsweb.com
2. Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum based measurement slope estimate using data from tri-annual universal screenings School Psychology Review, 37, 109-125.
3. Bollman, K. A., Silberglitt, B., & Gibbons, K. A. (2007). The SCRED Model: Incorporating systemslevel organization and a multi-tiered problem-solving process for intervention delivery. In M. Burns, S. Jimerson, & A. VanDerHayden (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 321332). New York: Springer.
4. Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 40-48.
5. Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2004). Effects of variation in teacher organization on classroom functioning. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 61-85.
6. Cantine, D., & C.ranzin, A. (2001). Setting learning expectations for students with disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 466-472.
7. Christ, T. J. (2008). Best practices in problem analysis. In A. Thomas & J. C.rimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 159-176). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
8. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure "change": Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68.
9. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
10. Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358-374.
11. Deno, S. L. (2002). Problem solving as best practices. In A. Thomas & J. C.rimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 37-56). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
12. Deno, S. L. (2005). Problem solving assessment. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Assessment for intervention: A problem-solving approach (pp. 10-42). New York: C.uilford Press.
13. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
14. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Flora, D. B. (2008). Specifying piecewise latent trajectory models for longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 513-533.
16. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 3-14.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43-52.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Stecker, P. M. (1989). Effects of curriculum-based measurement on teachers' instructional planning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 51-59.
19. Fuchs, L. S., & Shinn, M. R. (1989). Writing CBM IEP objectives. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 131152). New York: C.uildford Press.
20. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436-450.
21. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Whinnery, K. (1991). Effects of goal line feedback on level, slope, and stability of performance within curriculum-based measurement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 66-74.
23. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., McMaster, K. N., & Al Otaiba, S. (2003). Identifying children at risk for reading failure: Curriculum-based measurement and the dual-discrepancy approach. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 431-449). New York: Guilford Press.
24. Good, T. L. (1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, 38(5), 415-422.
25. Good, T., Cooper, H., & Blakey, X. (1980). Classroom interaction as a function of teacher expectations, student sex and time of year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 378-385.
26. Graney, S. B., Missall, K. N., Martinez, R. S., & Bergstrom, M. (2009). A preliminary investigation of within-year growth patterns in reading and mathematics curriculum-based measures. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 121-142.
27. Howe, K. B., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). Standard reading assessment passages (RAPs) for use in general outcome measurement: A manual describing development and technical features. Retrieved October 2004, from http://www.aimsweb.com
28. Kim, J. (2004). Summer reading and the ethnic achievement gap. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9, 169-188.
29. McKown, G, Weinstein, R. S. (2007). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235-261.
30. National Association of State Directors of Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author.
31. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel Subgroups: Teaching children to read (No. NIH 00-4754). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
32. National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers' expectancies: Determinants of pupils' IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115-118.
34. Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1985). The power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 83-90.
35. Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 164-172.
36. Shinn, M. R. (1988). Development of curriculum-based local norms for use in special education decisionmaking. School Psychology Review, 17, 61-80.
37. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guildford Press.
38. Shinn, M. (2008). Best practices for using curriculum based measurement in a problem solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 243-262). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
39. Stage, S. A. (2001). Program evaluation using hierarchical linear modeling with curriculum-based measurement reading probes. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 91112.
40. Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Ticha, R., & Espin, G A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 85-120.