Perceptually guided high-fidelity rendering exploiting movement bias in visual attention

ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Hasic, Jasminka ^a,b   Chalmers, Alan ^a   Sikudova, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b SARAJEVO SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Author keywords

Attention; Movement saliency; Perception; Saliency map; Selective rendering

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; MOVEMENT SALIENCY; PERCEPTION; SALIENCY MAP; SELECTIVE RENDERING;

COLOR PHOTOGRAPHY; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; IMAGE PROCESSING; ROTATION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

EID: 78649286955     PISSN: 15443558     EISSN: 15443965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1857893.1857899     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ARIS. 2003. Augmented reality image synthesis through illumination reconstruction and its integration in interactive and shared mobile ar-systems for e-motion-commerce applications proposal number: Ist-2000-28707. http://aris-ist.intranet.gr/.
2. Bartz, D., Cunningham, D.W., Fischer, J., and Wallraven, C. 2008. The role of perception for computer graphics. In Proceedings of the Eurographics 2008 Symposium on Parallel Graphics and Visualization. ACM, New York.
3. Bolin, M. and Meyer, G. 1998. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York, 299-310.
4. Bruce, V., Green, P. R., and Georgeson, M. A. 2003. Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. Psychology Press, East Sussex, UK.
5. Cater, K., Chalmers, A., and Ledda, P. 2002. Selective quality rendering by exploiting human inattentional blindness: Looking but not seeing. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, New York, 17-24.
6. Cater, K., Chalmers, A., and Ward, G. 2003. Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering. ACM, New York, 270-280.
7. Daly, S. 1993. The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In Digital Images and Human Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 179-206.
8. Debattista, K. 2006. Selective rendering for high-fidelity graphics. PhD thesis, Bristol University.
9. Debattista, K., Sundstedt, V., Pereira, F., and Chalmers, A. 2005. Selective parallel rendering for high-fidelity graphics. In Proceedings of Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.
10. Ellis, G. and Chalmers, A. 2006. The effect of translational ego-motion on the perception of High-fidelity animations. In Proceedings of the Spring Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York.
11. Ferwerda, J. A., Pattanaik, S.N., Shirley, P., and Greenberg, D. P. 1996. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York, 249-258.
12. Flannery, K. and Walles, R. 2003. How does schema theory apply to real versus virtual memories? Cyberspych. Behav. 6, 2, 151-159.
13. Franconeri, S. L. and Simons, D. J. 2003. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Percept. Psychophys. 65, 7, 999-1010.
14. Haber, J., Myszkowski, K., Yamauchi, H., and Seidel, H.-P. 2001. Perceptually guided corrective splatting. Comput. Graphics Forum 20, 142-152.
15. Hasic, J. and Chalmers, A. 2007. Visual attention for significantly influencing the perception of virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Winter School of Computer Graphics. http://wscg.zcu.cz/WSCG2007/wscg2007.htm.
16. Hasic, J., Chalmers, A., Mastoropoulou, G., and Debattista, K. 2007. Movement bias in visual attention for perceptually- guided selective rendering of animations. In Proceedings of the Spring Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York.
17. Hulusic, V., Aranha, M., and Chalmers, A. 2008. The influence of cross-modal interaction on perceived rendering quality thresholds. In Proceedings of Winter School of Computer Graphics. http://wscg.zcu.cz/WSCG2008/ wscg2008.htm.
18. Itti, L. and Koch, C. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Res. 40, 1489-1506.
19. James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology, Vol. 1. Holt, New York.
20. Longhurst, P., Debattista, K., and Chalmers, A. 2006. A gpu based saliency map for high-fidelity selective rendering. In Proceedings ofthe 4th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa. ACM, New York, 21-29.
21. Luebke, D. and Hallen, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceeding of 13th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. ACM, New York, 221-223.
22. Mack, A. and Rock, I. 1998. Inattentional blindness. In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Mania, K., Robinson, A., and Brandt, K. 2005. The effect of memory schemata on object recognition in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 14, 5, 606-615.
24. Marmitt, G. and Duchowski, A. T. 2002. Modeling visual attention in VR: Measuring the accuracy of predicted scanpaths. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques. ACM, New York, 217-226.
25. Mastoropoulou, G., Debattista, K., Chalmers, A., and Troscianco, T. 2005. The influence of sound effects on the perceived smoothness of rendered animations. In Proceedings ofthe 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM, New York, 9-15.
26. Mastoropoulou, G., Debattista, K., Chalmers, A., and Troscianko, T. 2005. Auditory bias of visual attention for perceptually-guided selective rendering of animations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.-ACM, New York.
27. Mather, G. 2006. Foundations of Perception. Psychology Press, East Sussex, UK.
28. McNamara, A., Chalmers, A.G., Troscianko, T., and Gilchrist, I. 2000. Comparing real and synthetic scenes using human judgements of lightness. In Proceeding of 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. ACM, New York.
29. Myszkowski, K. 1998. The visible difference predictor: Application to global illumination problems. In Proceeding of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. ACM, New York, 223-236.
30. Myszkowski, K., Tawara, T., Akamine, H., and Seidel, H. P. 2001. Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York, 221-230. (Pubitemid 33047307)
31. O'Sullivan, C., Howlett, S., Morvan, Y., McDonnell, R., and O'Connor, K. 2004. Perceptually adaptive graphics. In Proceeding of 15th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. ACM, New York, 141-164.
32. Pattanaik, S.N., Ferwerda, J.A., Fairchild, M.D., and Greenberg, D. P. 1998. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York, 287-298.
33. Peters, R.J. and Itti, L. 2008. Applying computational tools to predict gaze direction in interactive visual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 5, 2, 8.
34. Peterson, L.R. and Peterson, J. M. 1959. Short-term memory retention of individual items. J. Exp. Psych. 58, 193-198.
35. Pettersson, R. 1999. Attention: An information design perspective. DocDes.2, 114-130.
36. Ramasubramanian, M., Pattanaik, S.N., and Greenberg, D. P. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York, 73-82.
37. Reddy, M. 1997. Perceptually Modulated Level of Detail for Virtual Environments. Ph.D. Thesis CST- 134-97, University of Edinburgh.
38. Rojan, K. and Pettigrew, T. F. 1992. Memory for schema-relevant information: A meta-analytic resolution. Br. J. Soc.Psych. 31, 2, 81109.
39. Simons, D.J. and Chabris, C. F. 1999. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained intentional blindness for dynamic eventswxperimental stimuli. http://viscog.beckman.illinois.edu/ashmovie/15.php.
40. Storms, R. L. 1998. Auditory-visual cross-modal perception phenomena. PhD thesis, Naval Postgraduate School.
41. Tatler, B. W. 2007. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. J. Vision. 7, 14: 1-17.
42. USC. 2002-2007. University of Southern California iLab Neuromorphic Vision C++ Toolkit. http://ilab.usc.edu/toolkit.
43. Wald, I., Mark, W.R., Gunther, J., Boulos, S., Ize, T., Hunt, W., Parker, S.G., and Shirley, P. 2007. State of the art in ray tracing animated scenes. In Proceeding of 19th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. ACM, New York.
44. Ward, G.L. and Shakespeare, R. 2003. Rendering with Radiance: The Art and Science of Lighting Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
45. Watson, B., Friedman, A., and McGaffey, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computer Graphics. ACM, New York, 213-220.
46. Yarbus, A. 1967. Eye movements during perception of complex objects. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum, New York, 171-196.
47. Yee, H., Pattanaik, S., and Greenberg, D. P. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Trans. Comput. Graphics. 20, 39-65.