Auditory bias of visual attention for perceptually-guided selective rendering of animations

Proceedings - GRAPHITE 2005 - 3rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and Southeast Asia

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 363-369

  Mastoropoulou, Georgia ^a   Debattista, Kurt ^a   Chalmers, Alan ^a   Troscianko, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D graphics; Auditory visual interactions; Cross modal interactions; Perceptually adaptive techniques; Rendering techniques; Selective rendering

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE QUALITY; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

3D GRAPHICS; AUDITORY-VISUAL INTERACTIONS; CROSS-MODAL INTERACTIONS; PERCEPTUALLY-ADAPTIVE TECHNIQUES; RENDERING TECHNIQUES; SELECTIVE RENDERING;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 33745866645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1101389.1101462     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. BROADBENT, D. 1958. Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
2. BULLOT, N. J., 2004. Auditory and cross-modal attention for the cognitive access to objects. (Under review). http://nicolasbullot.org/Publi/PDF/Bullot_200x_Crossmodal-Attention_1.pdf Last accessed: 14/4/2005.
3. CARLSON, N. R. 1993. Psychology, The Science of Behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4. CATER, K., AND CHALMERS, A. 2003. Maintaining perceived quality for interactive tasks. In IS&T/SPIE Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VIII, SPIE Proceedings, vol. 5007-21.
5. CATER, K., CHALMERS, A., AND WARD, G. 2003. Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. In Proceedings Eurographics Rendering Symposium, Leuven.
6. DRIVER, J., AND SPENCE, C. 1998. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 1, 254-262.
7. ITTI, L., KOCH, C., AND NIEBUR,E. 1998. A model of saliencybased visual attention for rapid scene analysis. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 11, 1254-1259.
8. LUEBKE, D., AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceedings of 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. 221-223.
9. MACK, A., AND ROCK, I. 1998a. Inattentional Blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. MASTOROPOULOU, G., AND CHALMERS, A. 2004. The effect of music on the perception of display rate and duration of animated sequences: an experimental study. In Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics 2004 (TPCG'04), 128-134.
11. MASTOROPOULOU, G., DEBATTISTA, K., CHALMERS, A., AND TROSCIANKO, T. 2005. The influence of sound effects on the perceived smoothness of rendered animations. To be published in Proceedings APGV 2005 - ACM SIGGRAPH Second Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV'05).
12. MYSZKOWSKI, K., TAWARA, T., AKAMINE, H., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2001. Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, E. F. (Ed.), Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 221-230.
13. NOISTERNIG, M., MUSIL, T., SONTACCHI, A., AND HLDRICH, R. 2003. A 3d real time rendering engine for binaural sound reproduction. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Auditory Display, Boston, MA, USA, vol. 3663.
14. O'SULLIVAN, C., HOWLETT, S., MORVAN, Y., MCDONNELL, R., AND O'CONOR, K. 2004. Star report on perceptually adaptive graphics. In Eurographics 2004, Eurographics Association.
15. PATTANAIK, S., TUMBLIN, J., YEE, H., AND GREENBERG, D. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for realistic real-time image display. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 47-54.
16. PETERSON, L. R., AND PETERSON, M. J. 1959. Short-term memory retention of individual items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58, 193-198.
17. PETTERSSON, R., 1999. Attention an information design perspective! (International Institute for Information Design (HID), Vienna, Austria).
18. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, M., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, A. Rockwood, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 73-82.
19. RENSINK, R. 2000b. Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research 40, 1469-1487.
20. SIMONS, D. J., AND CHABRIS, C. 1999. Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28, 1059-1074.
21. SIMONS, D. 2000. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends In Cognitive Sciences 4, 147-155.
22. SOTO-FARACO, S., LYONS, J., GAZZANIGA, M. S., SPENCE, C., AND KINGSTONE, A. 2002. The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research 14, 139-146.
23. STORMS, R. L. 1998. Auditory-Visual Cross-Modal Perception Phenomena. PhD thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.
24. TELLINGHUISEN, D. J., AND NOWAK, E. J. 2003. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 5, 817-828.
25. WARD, G. 1994. The radiance lighting simulation and rendering system. In ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, vol. 28, 459-72.
26. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 213-220.
27. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. In ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, M. Cohen, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, vol. 20, 39-65.