The influence of sound effects on the perceived smoothness of rendered animations

Proceedings - APGV 2005: 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 9-15

  Mastoropoulou, Georgia ^a   Debattista, Kurt ^a   Chalmers, Alan ^a   Troscianko, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D graphics; Animations; Auditory visual interactions; Cross modal interactions; Frame rate; Perceived smoothness; Perceptually adaptive techniques

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVES; BANDWIDTH; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AUDITORY-VISUAL INTERACTIONS; CROSS-MODAL INTERACTIONS; FRAME RATE; PERCEIVED SMOOTHNESS; PERCEPTUALLY-ADAPTIVE TECHNIQUES;

ANIMATION;

EID: 29344470330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1080402.1080404     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. ABBEY, C. K., ECKSTEIN, M. P., AND BOCHUD, F. O. 1999. Estimation of human-observer templates for 2 alternative forced choice tasks. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3663, 284-295.
2. APTEKER, R. T., FISHER, J. A., KISIMOV, V. S., AND NEISHLOS, H. 1995. Video acceptability and frame rate. IEEE Multimedia 2, 3 (Fall), 32-40.
3. BLAUERT, J. 1997. Spatial Hearing : The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. BOX, G. E. P., HUNTER, W. G., AND HUNTER, J. S. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters. New York: Wiley.
5. BROADBENT, D. 1958. Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
6. CARLSON, N. R. 1993. Psychology, The Science of Behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
7. CATER, K., CHALMERS, A., AND WARD, G. 2003. Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. In Proceedings Eurographics Rendering Symposium, Leuven.
8. FUNKHOUSER, T., JOT, J., AND TSINGOS, N. 2002. Sounds good to me! computational sound for graphics, virtual reality, and interactive systems. In SIGGRAPH 2002 Course Notes, San Antonio, TX.
9. LARSSON, P., VASTFJALL, D., AND KLEINER, M. 2002. Better presence and performance in virtual environments by improved binaural sound rendering. In Proceedings of the AES 22nd Intl. Conf. on virtual, synthetic and entertainment audio, Espoo, Finland, 31-38.
10. LUEBKE, D., AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceedings of 12th Euro-graphics Workshop on Rendering, 221-223.
11. MASSARO, D. W., AND WARNER, D. S. 1977. Dividing attention between auditory and visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics 21, 569-574.
12. MASTOROPOULOU, G., AND CHALMERS, A. 2004. The effect of music on the perception of display rate and duration of animated sequences: an experimental study. In Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics 2004 (TPCG'04), 128-134.
13. MYSZKOWSKI, K., TAWARA, T., AKAMINE, H., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2001. Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, E. F. (Ed.), Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 221-230.
14. O' SULLIVAN, C., HOWLETT, S., MORVAN, Y., MCDONNELL, R., AND O' CONOR, K. 2004. Star report on perceptually adaptive graphics. In Eurographics 2004, Eurographics Association.
15. PATTANAIK, S., TUMBLIN, J., YEE, H., AND GREENBERG, D. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for realistic real-time image display. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 47-54.
16. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, M., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, A. Rock-wood, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 73-82.
17. RECANZONE, G. H. 2003. Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 89, 1078-1093.
18. SONO, H., AND Kuo, C. C. J. 2001. Rate control for low-bit-rate video via variable-encoding frame rates. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11, 4, 512-521.
19. STORMS, R. L. 1998. Auditory-Visual Cross-Modal Perception Phenomena. PhD thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.
20. TELLINGHUISEN, D. J., AND NOWAK, E. J. 2003. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 5, 817-828.
21. WATSON, B., FRIEDMAN, A., AND MCGAFFEY, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 213-220.
22. WELCH, R. B., DUTTONHURT, L. D., AND WARREN, D. H. 1986. Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception. Perceptual Psychophysiology 39, 294-300.
23. WINKLER, S., AND FALLER, C. 2005. Audiovisual quality evaluation of low-bitrate video. In SPIE/IS&T Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, vol. 5666, 139-148.
24. YEE, H., PATTANAIK, S., AND GREENBERG, D. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. In ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, M. Cohen, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, vol. 20, 39-65.