Paradigm shifts and the development of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Past experiences and future aspirations

Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 55, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 692-700

  First, Michael B ^a,b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorical approach; Descriptive approach; Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders; Dimensions; Paradigm shift; Psychiatric diagnosis

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MENTAL DISEASE; PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS; REVIEW;

EID: 78549238252     PISSN: 07067437     EISSN: 14970015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/070674371005501102     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Regier D, Kupfer DJ. DSM-V forum: progress in research and development. Presented at the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting; 2009 May 19; San Francisco (CA).
2. Grob G. Origins of DSM-I: a study in appearance and reality. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(4):421-431.
3. Wilson M. DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: a history. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150(3):399-410.
4. Spitzer R, Fleiss J. A re-analysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1974;125:341-347.
5. Szasz T. The myth of mental illness. Am Psychol. 1960;15:113-118.
6. Guze S. Psychiatric disorders and the medical model. Biol Psychiatry. 1974;5(3):221-224.
7. Mayes R, Horwitz A. DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness. J Hist Behav Sci. 2005;41(3):249-267. (Pubitemid 41311768)
8. Klerman G. A debate on DSM-III. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141(4):539-553.
9. American Psychiatric Association. Introduction. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Revised. Washington (DC): APA; 1987. p xvii-xxvii.
10. Boyd J, Burke J, Gruenberg E, et al. Exclusion criteria of DSM-III: a study of co-occurence of hierarchy-free syndromes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:983-989. (Pubitemid 14007857)
11. Frances A, Widiger T, Pincus H. The development of DSM-IV. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46(4):373-375.
12. Widiger T, Frances A, Pincus H, et al. Toward an empirical classification for the DSM-IV. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991;100(7):280-288.
13. Frances A, Pincus H, Widiger T, et al. DSM-IV: work in progress. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:1439-1448.
14. Widiger T, Frances A, Pincus H, et al. DSM-IV literature reviews: rationale, process, and limitations. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 1990;12(3):189-202.
15. Pincus H, Frances A, Davis W, et al. DSM-IV and new diagnostic categories: holding the line on proliferation. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149(1):112-117.
16. First MB, Frances A, Pincus H. DSM-IV-TR guidebook. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2004.
17. Widiger T, Frances A, Pincus H, et al, editors. DSM-IV sourcebook. Vol 1. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
18. Widiger T, Frances A, Pincus H, et al, editors. DSM-IV sourcebook. Vol 2. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 1996.
19. Widiger T, Frances A, Pincus H, et al, editors. DSM-IV sourcebook. Vol 3. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 1997.
20. Widiger T, Frances A, Pincus H, et al, editors. DSM-IV sourcebook. Vol 4. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 1998.
21. Klerman G. The significance of DSM-III in American psychiatry. In: Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Skodol A, editors. International perspectives on DSM-III. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press; 1983. p 3-25.
22. Kendell R. The choice of diagnostic criteria for biological research. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39(11):1334-1339. (Pubitemid 13232314)
23. Jablensky A. The nature of classification: issues beyond ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1999;33:137-144. (Pubitemid 29192682)
24. Krueger R, Piasecki T. Toward a dimensional and psychometrically-informed approach to conceptualizing psychopathology. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40(5):485-499. (Pubitemid 34270460)
25. Parker G. Beyond major depression. Psychol Med. 2005;35:467-474.
26. Cloninger C. A new conceptual paradigm from genetics and psychobiology for the science of mental health. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998;33:174-186. (Pubitemid 29192686)
27. Goldberg D. A dimensional model for common mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168(Suppl 30):44-49. (Pubitemid 26179805)
28. Widiger T, Samuel D. Diagnostic categories or dimensions: a question for the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders - fifth edition. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114(4):494-504. (Pubitemid 41746988)
29. Clark LA, Watson D, Reynolds S. Diagnosis and classification of psychopathology: challenges to the current system and future directions. Annu Rev Psychology. 1995;46:121-153.
30. Mellsop G, Menkes D, El-Badri S. Releasing psychiatry from the constraints of categorical diagnosis. Australas Psychiatry. 2007;15(1):3-5; discussion 6-8.
31. McHugh P. Striving for coherence: psychiatry's efforts over classification. JAMA. 2005;293:2526-2528. (Pubitemid 40705734)
32. Charney D, Barlow D, Botteron K, et al. Neuroscience research agenda to guide development of a pathophysiologically based classification system. In: Kupfer D, First MB, Regier D, editors. A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2002. p 31-84.
33. Kessler R, Chiu W, Demler O, et al. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):617-627. (Pubitemid 40973437)
34. Zimmerman M, McGlinchey J, Chelminski I, et al. Diagnostic co-morbidity in 2300 psychiatric out-patients presenting for treatment evaluated with a semi-structured diagnostic interview. Psychol Med. 2008;38(2):199-210. (Pubitemid 351156594)
35. Robins E, Guze S. Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1970;126(7):983-987.
36. Kendler KS. Major depression and generalized anxiety disorder: same genes, (partly) different environments - revisited. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;168(Suppl 30):68-75.
37. Tien A, Gallo J. Clinical diagnosis: a marker for disease? J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997;185(12):739-747.
38. Fairburn C, Cooper Z, Bahn K, et al. The severity and status of eating disorder NOS: implications for DSM-V. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45(8):1705-1715. (Pubitemid 47048120)
39. Cassano GB, Dell'Osso L, Frank E, et al. The bipolar spectrum: a clinical reality in search of diagnostic criteria and an assessment methodology. J Affect Disord. 1999;54(3):318-328.
40. Wilberg T, Hummelen B, Pedersen G, et al. A study of patients with personality disorder not otherwise specified. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49(5):460-468.
41. Kupfer D, First MB, Regier D. Introduction. In: Kupfer D, First MB, Regier D, editors. A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2002. p xv-xxiii.
42. Kupfer D, First MB, Regier D, editors. A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2002.
43. Narrow W, First MB, Sirovatka P, et al. Age and gender considerations in psychiatric diagnosis: a research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2007.
44. Phillips K, First MB. Introduction. In: Narrow W, First MB, Sirovatka P, et al, editors. Age and gender considerations in psychiatric diagnosis a research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2007.
45. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 research planning conference summaries and monographs [Internet]. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2010 [cited 2010 Sep 15]. Available from: http://www.dsm5.org/ Research/Pages/ConferenceSummariesandMonographs.aspx.
46. Goldberg D, Kendler K, Sirovatka P, et al. Diagnostic issues in depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2010.
47. Andrews G, Charney D, Sirovatka P, et al. Stress-induced and fear circuitry disorders. Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2009.
48. Dimsdale J, Xin Y, Kleinman A, et al. Somatic presentations of mental disorders. Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2009.
49. Helzer J, Kraemer H, Krueger R, et al, editors. Dimensional approaches in diagnostic classification: refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2008.
50. Saunders J, Schuckit M, Sirovatka P, et al, editors. Diagnostic issues in substance use disorders. Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2007.
51. Sunderland T, Jeste D, Baiyewu O, et al, editors. Diagnostic issues in dementia: advancing the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2007.
52. Tamminga C, Sirovatka P, Regier DA, et al. Deconstructing psychosis: refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2010.
53. Widiger T, Simonsen E, Sirovatka P, et al. Dimensional models of personality disorders: refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2007.
54. Van Os J, Gilvarry C, Bale E, et al. A comparison of the utility of dimensional and categorical representations of psychosis. Psychol Med. 1999;29:595-606. (Pubitemid 29261347)
55. Muthen B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl 1):6-16.
56. Hollander E, Kim S, Zohar J. OCSDs in the forthcoming DSM-V. CNS Spectr. 2007;12(5):320-323.
57. Regier D, Narrow W, Kuhl E, et al. The conceptual development of DSM-V. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(6):645-650.
58. Kupfer D, Regier D, Kuhl E. On the road to DSM-V and ICD-11. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;258(Suppl 5):2-6.
59. Task Force for the Handbook of Psychiatric Measures. Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
60. Peele R, May C, Houston M, et al. Action paper: DSM multiaxial system. Presented to the Assembly of American Psychiatric Association; 2004 May.
61. First MB. Clinical utility: a prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114(4):560-564.
62. Ruscio A. Important questions remain to be addressed before adopting a dimensional classification of mental disorders. Am Psychol. 2008;63(1):61-62.
63. Rottman B, Ahn W, Sanislow C, et al. Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases? Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:427-433.
64. Sprock J. Dimensional versus categorical classification of prototypic and nonprototypic cases of personality disorder. J Clin Psychology. 2003;59(9):991-1014. (Pubitemid 37082019)
65. First MB. Clinical utility in the revision of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM). Prof Psychol Res Pr. Forthcoming.
66. Hyman S. Forward. In: Phillips K, First MB, Pincus H, editors. Advancing DSM: dilemmas in psychiatric diagnosis. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2003. p xi-xix.
67. Maser J, Patterson T. Spectrum and nosology: implications for DSM-V. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002;25:855-885.
68. First MB. Beyond clinical utility: broadening the DSM-V research appendix to include alternative diagnostic constructs. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(10):1679-1681.
69. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(7):748-751.