Clinical utility: A prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 560-564

  First, Michael B ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorical approaches; Clinical utility; Dimensional approaches; DSM V; User acceptibility

Indexed keywords

SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR;

AGGRESSION; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COMORBIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; IMPULSIVENESS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MINNESOTA MULTIPHASIC PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PERSONALITY DISORDER; REVIEW;

EID: 28544447483     PISSN: 0021843X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.560     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
5. Bassett, A., & Beiser, M. (1991). DSM-III: Use of the multiaxial diagnostic system in clinical practice. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 270-274.
6. Blashfield, R. (1982). Feighner et al., invisible colleges, and the Matthew effect. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 8, 1-12.
7. Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Cantor, N., Smith, E., French, R., & Mezzich, J. (1980). Psychiatric diagnosis as prototype categorization. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 181-193.
9. Clark, L. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505-521.
10. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Craig, T., Goodman, A., & Haugland, G. (1982). Impact of DSM-III on clinical practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 922-925.
12. Feighner, J., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruff, R. J., Winokur, G., & Munoz, R. (1972). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 57-63.
13. First, M. (2003). Psychiatric classification. In A. Tasman, J. Kay, & J. Lieberman (Eds.), Psychiatry (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 659-676). Chichester, England: Wiley.
14. First, M., Bell, C., Cuthbert, B., Krystal, J., Malison, R., Offord, D., et al. (2002). Personality disorders and relational disorders: A research agenda for addressing crucial gaps in DSM. In D. Kupfer, M. First, & D. Regier (Eds.), A research agenda for DSM-V (pp. 123-200). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
15. First, M., Pincus, H., Levine, J., Williams, J., Ustun, B., & Peele, R. (2004). Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 946-954.
16. Jampala, V., Sierles, F., & Taylor, M. (1986). Consumers' views of DSM-III: Attitudes and practices of U.S. psychiatrists and 1984 graduating psychiatric residents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 148-153.
17. Jampala, V., Sierles, F., & Taylor, M. (1988). The use of DSM-III in the United States: A case of not going by the book. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 29, 39-47.
18. Klerman, G., Vaillant, G., Spitzer, R., & Michels, R. (1984). A debate on DSM-III. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 539-553.
19. Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood: A dimensional-spectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 537-550.
20. Kupfer, D., First, M., & Regier, D. (2002a). Introduction. In D. Kupfer, M. First, & D. Regier (Eds.), A research agenda for DSM-V (pp. xv-xxiii). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
21. Kupfer, D., First, M., & Regier, D. (Eds.). (2002b). A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
22. MacKenzie, K. (2002). Using personality measurements in clinical practice. In P. T. Costa, Jr., & T. A. Widiger (Eds.). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 377-390). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. McKegney, F. (1982). DSM-III: A definite advance, but the struggle continues. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4, 281-282.
24. Morey, L., & Ochoa, E. (1989). An investigation of adherence to diagnostic criteria: Clinical diagnosis of the DSM-III personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3, 180-192.
25. Oldham, J., & Skodol, A. (2000). Charting the future of Axis II. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 17-29.
26. Rounsaville, B., Alarcon, R., Andrews, G., Jackson, J., Kendell, R., & Kendler, K. S. (2002). Basic nomenclature issues for DSM-V. In D. Kupfer, M. First, & D. Regier (Eds.), A research agenda for DSM-V (pp. 1-30). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
27. Sanderson, C. & Clarkin, J. F. (2002). Further use of the NEO-PI-R personality dimensions in differential treatment planning. In P. T. Costa, Jr., & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 351-376). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Skodol, A., Spitzer, R., & Williams, J. (1981). Teaching and learning DSM-III. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 1581-1586.
29. Spitzer, R., Williams, J., & Skodol, A. (1980). DSM-III: The major achievements and an overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 151-164.
30. Watson, D. (2005). Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders: A quantitative hierarchical model for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 522-536.
31. Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (2000). A prototype matching approach to diagnosing personality disorders: Toward DSM-V. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 109-126.
32. Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five-factor model. In P. T. Costa, Jr., & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 431-456). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Widiger, T. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2005). Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 494-504.
34. Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130.
35. Williams, J., Spitzer, R., & Skodol, A. (1985). DSM-III in residency training: Results of a national survey. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 755-758.
36. Wilson, M. (1993). DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: A history. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 399-410.
37. World Health Organization. (1992). International classification of diseases (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.