Online and face-to-face discussions in the classroom: A study on the experiences of 'active' and 'silent' students

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 132-136

  Asterhan, Christa S C ^a   Eisenmann, Tammy ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM SETTINGS; CO-LOCATED; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS; SECONDARY SCHOOLS;

BLENDING; COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

STUDENTS;

EID: 78449284724     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2008). Argumentation and explanation in peer-to-peer dialogue that supports conceptual change. Paper submitted for publication.
2. Caspi, A., Chajut, E., Saporta, K., & Beyth-Marom, R. (2006). The influence of personality on social participation in learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 129-144. (Pubitemid 43842716)
3. Chi, M. T. H., Roy, M., Hausmann, R. G. M. (2008) Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 33, 301-341
4. Cuban, L. (2002). Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: Face-to-face or online discussion? Learning & Instruction, 18, 187-200.
6. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In: S. A. Barab, R. Kling, and J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338-376). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Eisenmann, T. & Even, R. (in press). Similarities and differences in the types of algebraic activities in two classes taught by the same teacher. In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenmann & G. Lloyd (Eds.), Teachers' use of mathematics curriculum materials: Research perspectives on relationships between teachers and curriculum.
8. Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. (Pubitemid 39519587)
9. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
10. Newman, D. R., Webb, N., & Cochrane, B. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critttical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3, 56-77.
11. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In: W. Damon (Series Ed) and D. Kuhn (Vol Ed), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 4, 5th Ed (679-744). NewYork: Wiley.
12. Schwarz, B. B., & De Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 297-313.
13. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321-326. (Pubitemid 38880146)
14. Webb, N.M., Troper, J.D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.
15. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York, NY: Kluwer-Springer.