Reproducibility of the gadolinium concentration measurements and of the fitting parameters of the vascular input function in the superior sagittal sinus in a patient population

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1420-1430

  Lavini, Cristina ^a   Verhoeff, Joost J C ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arterial input function (AIF); Contrast agent; Correction; DCE MRI; Pharmacokinetic modelling; Reproducibility; Vascular input function (VIF)

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL;

ALGORITHM; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTICLE; BRAIN SIZE; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLIOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SUPERIOR SAGITTAL SINUS; VASCULAR INPUT FUNCTION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; CRANIAL SINUSES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78449255742     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hylton N. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24(20):3293-3298.
2. Hayes C., Padhani A.R., Leach M.O. Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 2002, 15:154-163.
3. Padhani A.R. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 16:407-422.
4. Tofts P.S., Brix G., Buckley D.L., Evelhoch J.L., Henderson E., Knopp M.V., et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast enhanced T1-w MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 10(3):223-232.
5. Buckley D.L. Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002, 47(3):601-606.
6. Haroon H.A., Buckley D.L., Patankar T.A., Dow G.R., Rutherford S.A., Balériaux D., et al. A comparison of Ktrans measurements obtained with conventional and first pass pharmacokinetic models in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 19(5):527-536.
7. Rijpkema M., Kaanders J.H., Joosten F.B., van der Kogel A.J., Heerschap A. Method for quantitative mapping of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in human tumors. J. Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 14(4):457-463.
8. Singh A., Rathore R.K., Harris M., Verma S.K., Husain N., Gupta R.K. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 29(1):166-176.
9. Workie D.W., Dardzinski B.J. Quantifying dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis using an arterial input function (AIF) extracted from popliteal artery enhancement, and the effect of the choice of the AIF on the kinetic parameters. Magn Reson Med 2005, 54(3):560-568.
10. van Laarhoven H.W., Rijpkema M., Punt C.J., Ruers T.J., Hendriks J.C., Barentsz J.O., et al. Method for quantitation of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in colorectal liver metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 18(3):315-320.
11. Tofts P.S., Kermode A.G. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991, 17(2):357-367.
12. Harrer J.U., Parker G.J., Haroon H.A., Buckley D.L., Embelton K., Roberts C., et al. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 20(5):748-757.
13. Singh A., Haris M., Rathore D., Purwar A., Sarma M., Bayu G., et al. Quantification of physiological and hemodynamic indices using T(1) dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in intracranial mass lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26(4):871-880.
14. Simpson N.E., Evelhoch J.L., Deuterium N.M.R. tissue perfusion measurements using the tracer uptake approach: II. Comparison with microspheres in tumors. Magn Reson Med. 1999, 42(2):240-247.
15. Parker G.J.M., Roberts C., Macdonald A., Buonaccorsi G., Cheung S.W., Buckley D.L., et al. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high temporal resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006, 56:993-1000.
16. Parker G.J., Jackson A., Waterton J.C., Buckley D.L. Automated arterial function extraction for T1-weighted DCE-MRI. Proceedings of the 11th meeting of the ISMRM 2003, 1264.
17. Chen J., Yao J., Thomasson D. Automatic determination of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in tumor assessment. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2008, 11(Pt 1):594-601.
18. Lavini C., de Jonge M.C., van de Sande M.G.H., Tak P.P., Nederveen A.J., Maas M. Pixel by pixel analysis of DCE MRI curve patterns and an illustration of its application to the imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:604-612.
19. Yang C., Karczmar G.S., Medved M., Stadler W.M. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation. Magn Reson Med 2007 Dec, 58(6):1266-1275.
20. Li K.L., Zhu X.P., Waterton J., Jackson A.J. Improved 3D quantitative mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability in brain tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12(2):347-357.
21. Verhoeff J.J., Lavini C., van Linde M.E., Stalpers L.J., Majoie C.B., Reijneveld J.C., et al. Bevacizumab and dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent high-grade glioma. Ann Oncol 2010, 21(8):1723-1727.
22. Chen H.L. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI. Journal of Magn Res Imag 2007, 25:1073-1078.
23. Rooney W.D., Johnson G., Li X. Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo. Magn Res Med 2007, 57:308-318.
24. Haase A. Snapshop FLASHMRI, Applications to T1, T2 and chemical shift imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990, 13:77-89.
25. Workie D.W., Dardzinski B.J., Graham T.B., Laor T., Bommer W.A., O'Brien K.J. Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis based on pharmacokinetic modeling. Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 22(9):1201-1210.
26. Hittmair K., Gomiscek G., Langenberger K., Recht M., Imhof H. Kramer. Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J. Magn Reson Med. 1994, 31(5):567-571.
27. Calamante F., Vonken E.J., van Osch M.J. Contrast agent concentration measurements affecting quantification of bolus-tracking perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007, 58(3):544-553.
28. Orton M.R., d'Arcy J.A., Walker-Samuel S., Hawkes D.J., Atkinson D., Collins D.J., et al. Computationally efficient vascular input function models for quantitative kinetic modelling using DCE-MRI. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53(5):1225-1239.
29. Fritz-Hansen T., Rostrup E., Larsson H.B., Søndergaard L., Ring P., Henriksen O. Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996, 36(2):225-231.
30. Henderson E., Rutt B.K., Lee T.Y. Temporal Sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modelling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998, 16:1057-1073.
31. Ivancevic M.K., Zimine I., Montet X., Hyacinthe J.N., Lazeyras F., Foxall D., et al. Inflow effect correction in fast gradient-echo perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003, 50(5):885-891.
32. Yankeelov T.E., Rooney W.D., Li X., Springer C.S. Variation of the relaxographic shutter speed for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 50:1151-1168.
33. Calamante F., Gadian D.G., Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000, 44(3):466-473.
34. Yang C., Karczmar G.S., Medved M., Stadler W.M. Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI studies: fundamental concepts and simulations. Phys Mad Biol 2004, 49:639-664.