The quality of service desired by public transport users

Transport Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 217-227

  Dell'Olio, Luigi ^a   Ibeas, Angel ^a   Cecin, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Desired quality; Efficient design; Focus groups; Multinomial logit; Stated preference survey

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; MARKETING; MOBILITY; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SERVICE PROVISION; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 78349311742     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. dell'Olio, L., et al., 2010. Modelling user perception of bus transit quality. Transport Policy, doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.04.006.
2. Foote P.J., Stuart D.G. Customer satisfaction contrasts express versus local bus service in Chicago's North Corridor. Transportation Research Record 1998, (1618):143-152.
3. Garrido R.A., Ortúzar J.D. Deriving public transport level of service weights from a multiple comparison of latent and observable variables. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 1994, 45.
4. Glascock J. Research on customer requirements for transit service design and delivery. Transportation Research Record 1997, (1604):121-127.
5. Hensher D.A. Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of the practice. Transportation 1994, 21:107-133.
6. Hensher D.A., Houghton E. Performance-based quality contracts for the bus sector: delivering social and commercial value for money. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38:123-146.
7. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005, Cambridge University Press.
8. Hensher D.A., Stanley J. Performance-based quality contracts in bus service provision. Transportation Research Part A 2003, (37):519-538.
9. Hensher D.A., Stopher P., Bullock P. Service quality-developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts. Transportation Research Part A 2003, 37:499-517.
10. Huber J., Zwerina K. The importance of utility balance and efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 1996, (33):307-317.
11. Ibeas A., dell'Olio L., Barreda R. Citizen involvement in promoting sustainable mobility. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.005.
12. Lirman T. Valuing transit service quality improvements. Journal of Public Transportation 2008, 11(2):43-63.
13. Molinero A., Sanchez L. Transporte público: Planeación, diseño, operación y administración 1997, Publicaciones UAEM.
14. Ortúzar J.D., Willumsen L. Modeling Transport 1994, John Wiley and Sons.
15. Powe N.A., Garrod G.D., McMahon P.L. Mixing methods within stated preference environmental valuation: choice experiments and post-questionnaire qualitative analysis. Ecological Economics 2005.
16. Rizzi L.I., Ortúzar J.D. Road safety valuation under a state choice framework. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2006.
17. Rose J.M., Bliemer M., Hensher D., Collins A. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42:395-406.