Surgical prosection in a traditional anatomical curriculum-Tübingens' Sectio chirurgica

Annals of Anatomy

Volumn 192, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 349-354

  Hirt, B ^a   Shiozawa, T ^a   Herlan, S ^a   Wagner, H J ^a   Kuppers E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dissection; Multidisciplinary teaching; Prosection; T bingens' Sectio chirurgica

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; DISSECTION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; INTERDISCIPLINARY EDUCATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; TEACHING;

ANATOMY; CADAVER; CURRICULUM; DISSECTION; GERMANY; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; SPECIALTIES, SURGICAL; TEACHING; TELEMEDICINE; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 78349306105     PISSN: 09409602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amadio P.C. Reaffirming the importance of dissection. Clin. Anat. 1996, 9:136-137.
2. Aziz M.A., McKenzie J.C., Wilson J.S., Cowie R.J., Ayeni S.A., Dunn B.K. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat. Rec. 2002, 269:20-32.
3. Bergman E.M., Prince K.J., Drukker J., van der Vleuten C.P., Scherpbier A.J. How much anatomy is enough?. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2008, 1:184-188.
4. Bertman S.L., Marks S.C. Humanities in medical education: rationale and resources for the dissection laboratory. Med. Educ. 1985, 19:374-381.
5. Bockers A., Jerg-Bretzke L., Lamp C., Brinkmann A., Traue H.C., Bockers T.M. The gross anatomy course: an analysis of its importance. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2010, 3:3-11.
6. Charlton R., Smith G. Undergraduate medical students' views on the value of dissecting. Med. Educ. 2000, 34:961.
7. Collins J.P. Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy. BMJ 2008, 337:a1310.
8. Dalley A.F. The American Association of Clinical Anatomists (AACA): the other American anatomy association. Anat. Rec. 1999, 257:154-156.
9. Drake R.L., McBride J.M., Lachman N., Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2009, 2:253-259.
10. Dyer G.S., Thorndike M.E. Quidne mortui vivos docent? The evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Acad. Med. 2000, 75:969-979.
11. Ellis H. Teaching in the dissecting room. Clin. Anat. 2001, 14:149-151.
12. Fraher J.P., Evans D.J. Training tomorrow's anatomists today: a partnership approach. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2009, 2:119-125.
13. Granger N.A. Dissection laboratory is vital to medical gross anatomy education. Anat. Rec. B: New Anat. 2004, 281:6-8.
14. Green N.A. Anatomy training for surgeons - a personal viewpoint. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 1998, 43:69-70.
15. Gregory S.R., Cole T.R. MSJAMA. The changing role of dissection in medical education. JAMA 2002, 287:1180-1181.
16. Guttmann G.D., Drake R.L., Trelease R.B. To what extent is cadaver dissection necessary to learn medical gross anatomy? A debate forum. Anat. Rec. B: New Anat. 2004, 281:2-3.
17. Hanna S.J., Freeston J.E. Importance of anatomy and dissection: the junior doctor's viewpoint. Clin. Anat. 2002, 15:377-378.
18. Heylings D.J. Anatomy 1999-2000: the curriculum, who teaches it and how?. Med. Educ. 2002, 36:702-710.
19. Hinduja K., Samuel R., Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: is anatomy a casualty?. Surgeon 2005, 3:84-87.
20. Holla S.J., Ramachandran K., Isaac B., Koshy S. Anatomy education in a changing medical curriculum in India: medical student feedback on duration and emphasis of gross anatomy teaching. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2009, 2:179-183.
21. Jones D.G. Reassessing the importance of dissection: a critique and elaboration. Clin. Anat. 1997, 10:123-127.
22. Ludinghausen V. The goal of dissection in clinically orientad teaching. Clin. Anat. 1992, 5:488-489.
23. Marks S.C., Bertman S.L., Penney J.C. Human anatomy: a foundation for education about death and dying in medicine. Clin. Anat. 1997, 10:118-122.
24. McLachlan J.C. New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection. Anat. Rec. B: New Anat. 2004, 281:4-5.
25. McLachlan J.C., Bligh J., Bradley P., Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med. Educ. 2004, 38:418-424.
26. Miles K.A. Diagnostic imaging in undergraduate medical education: an expanding role. Clin. Radiol. 2005, 60:742-745.
27. Monkhouse W.S. Anatomy and the medical school curriculum. Lancet 1992, 340:834-835.
28. Moxham B.J., Plaisant O. Perception of medical students towards the clinical relevance of anatomy. Clin. Anat. 2007, 20:560-564.
29. Mutyala S., Cahill D.R. Catching up. Clin. Anat. 1996, 9:53-56.
30. Newell R.L. Follow the royal road: the case for dissection. Clin. Anat. 1995, 8:124-127.
31. Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2004, 2:79-90.
32. Pabst R. Modern macroscopic anatomy-more than just cadaver dissection. Anat. Rec. 2002, 269:209.
33. Parker G.J., Wheeler-Kingshott C.A., Barker G.J. Estimating distributed anatomical connectivity using fast marching methods and diffusion tensor imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2002, 21:505-512.
34. Parker L.M. Anatomical dissection: why are we cutting it out? Dissection in undergraduate teaching. ANZ J. Surg. 2002, 72:910-912.
35. Prince K.J., van Mameren H., Hylkema N., Drukker J., Scherpbier A.J., van der Vleuten C.P. Does problem-based learning lead to deficiencies in basic science knowledge? An empirical case on anatomy. Med. Educ. 2003, 37:15-21.
36. Rao S., van Holsbeeck L., Musial J.L., Parker A., Bouffard J.A., Bridge P., Jackson M., Dulchavsky S.A. A pilot study of comprehensive ultrasound education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine: a pioneer year review. J. Ultrasound Med. 2008, 27:745-749.
37. Trelease R.B. Anatomical informatics: millennial perspectives on a newer frontier. Anat. Rec. 2002, 269:224-235.
38. Turney B.W. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2007, 89:104-107.
39. Warner J.H., Rizzolo L.J. Anatomical instruction and training for professionalism from the 19th to the 21st centuries. Clin. Anat. 2006, 19:403-414.
40. Waterston S.W., Stewart I.J. Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin. Anat. 2005, 18:380-384.
41. Willan P.L., Humpherson J.R. Concepts of variation and normality in morphology: important issues at risk of neglect in modern undergraduate medical courses. Clin. Anat. 1999, 12:186-190.
42. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med. Educ. 2007, 41:15-22.
43. Wright S.A., Bell A.L. Enhancement of undergraduate rheumatology teaching through the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008, 47:1564-1566.
44. Zucconi W.B., Guelfguat M., Solounias N. Approach to the educational opportunities provided by variant anatomy, illustrated by discussion of a duplicated inferior vena cava. Clin. Anat. 2002, 15:165-168.