To what extent is cadaver dissection necessary to learn medical gross anatomy? A debate forum

Anatomical Record - Part B New Anatomist

Volumn 281, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 2-3

  Guttmann, Geoffrey D ^a   Drake, Richard L ^a   Trelease, Robert B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CADAVER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISSECTION; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GREECE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKILL;

ANATOMY; CADAVER; DISSECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 9644254130     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20042     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Granger N. 2004. Dissection laboratory is vital to medical gross anatomy education. Anat Rec (Part B: New Anat) 281B:6-8.
2. McLachlan J. 2004. New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection. Anat Rec (Part B: New Anat) 281B:9-11.
3. Pawlina W, Lachman N. 2004. Dissection in learning and teaching gross anatomy: rebuttal to McLachlan. Anat Rec (Part B: New Anat) 281B:9-11.
4. Topp K. 2004. Prosection vs. dissection, the debate continues: rebuttal to Granger. Anat Rec (Part B: New Anat) 281B:12-14.