Assessment of the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F);Öǧrenme Yaklaşımları Ölçeǧi Yeni Şeklini Türkçeye Uyarlama ve Geçerlilik Güvenirlilik Çalişması

Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1639-1646

  Bati, A Hilal ^a   Tetlk, Cihat ^b   Gürpinar, Erol ^c  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^b PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^c AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Education; Medical; Reproducibility of results; Study characteristics; Undergraduate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVISED TWO FACTOR STUDY PROCESS QUESTIONNAIRE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALIDITY;

EID: 78349301993     PISSN: 13000292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5336/medsci.2009-15368     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aydin A. [Learning]. Gelişim ve Öǧrenme Psikolojisi. 4. Baski{dotless}. İstanbul: ALFA Basi{dotless}m Yayi{dotless}m; 2003. p.185-7.
2. Biggs J. Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. In: Kirby JR, ed. Cognitive Strategies and Educational Performance. 1st ed. Orlando Fla: Academic Press; 1984. p.111-34.
3. Kirby JR, Knapper CK, Evans CJ, Carty AE, Gadula C. Approaches to learning at work and workplace climate. Int J Training Dev 2003;7(1):31-52.
4. Zhang LF, Sternberg RJ. Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations. J Psychol 2000; 134(5):469-89.
5. Abraham RR, Vinod P, Kamath MG, Asha K, Ramnarayan K. Learning approaches of undergraduate medical students to physiology in a non-PBL-and partially PBL-oriented curriculum. Adv Physiol Educ 2008;32(1):35-7.
6. Newble DI, Entwistle NJ. Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education. Med Educ 1986;20(3):162-75.
7. Tural Dinçer G, Akdeniz AR. Examining learning approaches of science student teachers according to the class level and gender. US-China Education Review 2008;5(12):54-9.
8. Dart BC, Burnett PC, Purdie NM. Students1 conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. J Educ Res 2000;93(4):262-70.
9. Aharony N. The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as a foreign language in an Internet environment. Br J Educ Psychol 2006;76(Pt 4):851-66.
10. Evans CJ, Kirby JR, Fabrigar LR. Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. Br J Educ Psychol 2003;73(Pt 4):507-28.
11. Gordon C, Debus R. Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context, Br J Educ Psychol 2002;72(4):483-511.
12. Phan HP. Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles: a longitudinal study. Br J Educ Psychol 2008;78(1):75-93.
13. Sezgin Selçuk G, Çalişkan S, Erol M. [Evaluation of learning approaches for prospective physics teachers]. Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty 2007;27(2):25-41.
14. Aksayan S, Gözüm S. [A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale 1: Scale adaptation steps and language adaptation]. Turkish Journal of Research and Development in Nursing 2002;4(1):9-14.
15. Deniz KZ. [The adaptation of psychological scales]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences 2007;40(1): 1-16.
16. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DY. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol 2001; 71 (Pt 1): 133-49.
17. Aygin D, Eti Aslan F. [The Turkish adaptation of the female sexual function index]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2005:25(3):393-9.
18. Tezbaşaran AA. [Liker'ts type scale development]. Bölüm 3, 2. baski{dotless}, Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneǧi Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}; 1997. p.45-51.
19. Mclean M. Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement? Teaching Higher Educ 2001; 6(3):399-414.
20. Pimparyon P, Poonchai B, Roof S, Pemba S. Education environment, student approaches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing school. Med Teach 2000;22(4): 359-65.