Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: A single case study

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 29-36

  Shibli, Jamil Awad ^a   Feres, Magda ^a   De Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina ^a   Iezzi, Giovanna ^c   Piattelli, Adriano ^b,c  

^a GUARULHOS UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b Department of Oral Medicine and Pathology ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Human histology; Implant microstructure; Implant surfaces; Osseointegration; Titanium dental implants; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; DENTAL ALLOY; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CASE REPORT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 33947118111     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-3-29     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Thomas K, Cook SD. Relationship between surface characteristics and the degree of bone-implant integration. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992 Jun; 26(6):831-33.
2. Albrektsson T, Bränemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981; 52(2):155-70.
3. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991 Jul; 25(7):889-902.
4. Hall J, Lausmaa J. Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants. Apll. Osseointegration Res. 2000 1(1):5-8.
5. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of titanium implants. Biomaterials 2003 Oct;24(22): 3893-907.
6. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 May/Jun;18(3):341-8.
7. Degidi M, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Bone contact around acid-etched implants: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of two human-retrieved implants. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29(1):13-8.
8. Trisi P, Lazarra R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol. 2003,Jul;74(7):945-56.
9. Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO2 blasted and turned titanium microimplants in human. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001, Apr;12(2):128-34.
10. Zhu X, Kim KH, Jeong Y. Anodic oxide films containing Ca and P of titanium biomaterial. Biomaterials 2001, Aug:22(16):2199-206.
11. Den Braber ET, De Ruijter JE, Smits HTJ, Ginsel LA, Von Recum AF, Jansen JA. Effect of parallel surface microgrooves and surface energy on cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995, Apr;29(4):511-8.
12. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Cochran DL. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation and protein syntesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995, Mar;29(3):389-401.
13. Schwartz Z, Lohmann CH, Oefinger J, Bonewald LF, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res. 1999 Jun;13:38-48.
14. Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Albandar JM, Hall J, Wikesjö UME. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite®) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 105-111.
15. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evalution of non-submerged ITI implants. Part I. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997,Jun;8(3):161-72.
16. Friberg B, JemtT, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Bränemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991, summer;6(2):142-6.
17. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone. A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991, Jan;62(1):2-4.
18. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergtrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:175-182.
19. Ivanoff CJ. On surgical and implant related factors influencing integration and function of titanium implants. Experimental and clinical aspects. [thesis]. Göteborg: Göteborg University, 1999.
20. Leib AM, Kowalsky CJ. Human histological research: is it necessary? Humane? Ethical? J Periodontol 2005; 76:1207-1210.