Late patch test reaction to Disperse Orange 1 not related to active sensitization

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 298-299

  Malinauskiene, L ^a,b   Bruze, M ^b   Ryberg, K ^b,c   Zimerson, E ^b   Isaksson, M ^b  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UDDEVALLA HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; Disperse Orange 1; late reaction; patch test

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ALLERGEN; DISPERSE ORANGE 1; DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; CASE REPORT; CONTACT SENSITIZATION; ECZEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; PATCH TEST;

ADULT; AZO COMPOUNDS; COLORING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78349285975     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01810.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ryberg K, Goossens G, Isaksson M, Gruvberger B, Zimerson E, Bruze M., Patch testing with a textile dye mix in a baseline series in two countries. Acta Derm Venereol (Submitted).
2. Bruze M., Simultaneous patch test sensitization to 4 chemically unrelated compounds in a standard test series. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 48-49.
3. Frick-Engfeldt M, Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Bruze M., How to optimize patch testing with diphenylmethane diisocyanate. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 57: 138-151.
4. Bruze M, Condé-Salazar L, Goossens A et al., Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 241-250.
5. Bruze M, Hedman H, Björkner B, Möller H., The development and course of test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 386-391.
6. Isaksson M, Bruze M., Late patch-test reactions to budesonide need not be a sign of sensitization induced by the test procedure. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2003: 14: 154-156.
7. Goon A T, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Goh C L, Soo-Quee Koh D, Isaksson M., Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 59: 307-313.
8. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen O B., Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1999: 10: 62-67.
9. Jensen C D, Paulsen E, Andersen K E., Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 2006: 55: 30-35.
10. Hillen U, Jappe U, Frosch P J et al., Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Br J Dermatol 2006: 154: 665-670.
11. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Kuuliala O, Jolanki R., Late reactions in patch tests: a 4-year review from a clinic of occupational dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 81-86.
12. Gawkrodger D J, Paul L., Late patch test reactions: delayed immune response appears to be more common than active sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 59: 185-187.
13. Hellinckx K, Goossens A., Late reactions to paraphenylenediamine are not always an indication of active sensitization: an example. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 58: 110.
14. Ryberg K, Gruvberger B, Zimerson E et al., Chemical investigations of disperse dyes in patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 2008: 58: 199-209.
15. Ahuja V, Schreiber C, Platzek T, Stahlmann R., Investigation of the sensitising and cross-reacting potential of textile dyes and β-lactam antibiotics using a biphasic mice local lymph nose assay. Arch Toxicol 2009: 83: 691-699.