Late reactions to para-phenylenediamine are not always an indication of active sensitization: An example

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 110-

  Hellinckx, K ^a   Goossens, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Active sensitisation; Allergic contact dermatitis; Delayed, late reactions; para phenylenediamine; Standard series

Indexed keywords

DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE;

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; CASE REPORT; CLOTHING; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ERYTHEMA; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; PATCH TEST; PRICK TEST; PRURITUS; RADIOALLERGOSORBENT TEST; SENSITIZATION; SHOULDER; SKIN ALLERGY; TEXTILE;

ADULT; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATITIS, ATOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 38049033788     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01176.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Devos S A, Van der Valk P G M. The risk of active sensitization to PPD. Contact Dermatitis 2001 : 44 : 273 275.
2. Mcfadden J P, White I R. Should para-phenylenediamine (PPD) 1% pet be a part of commercially available standard series? Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 183 184.
3. Diepgen T L. Paraphenylenediamine (PPD) 1% pet is an important allergen in the standard series. Contact Dermatitis 2005 : 53 : 185.
4. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Kuuliala O, Jolank R. Late reactions in patch tests: a 4-year review from a clinic of occupational dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 2007 : 56 : 81 86.