Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 30-35

  Jensen, Charlotte D ^a   Paulsen, Evy ^a   Andersen, Klaus E ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Active sensitization; Patch test sensitization; Patch testing

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; SODIUM AUROTHIOSULFATE;

ALLERGIC REACTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECZEMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PATCH TEST; RARE DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN TESTS;

EID: 33745620717     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00863.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Fisher A A. Contact Dermatitis, 3rd edition. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1986: 14.
2. Wahlberg J E. Patch testing. In: Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 3rd edition, Rycroft R J G, Menné T, Frosch P J, Lepoittevin J-P (eds): Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2001: 458.
3. Malanin K. Active sensitization to camphoroquinone and double active sensitization to acrylics with long-lasting patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 284-285.
4. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Sensitization to patch test acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 10-15.
5. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R. Double active sensitization caused by acrylics. Am J Contact Dermat 1992: 3: 23-26.
6. Kanerva L, Estlander T. Simultaneous active sensitization to multiple chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 174-175.
7. de Groot A C, Liem D H, Weyland J W. Kathon CG: cosmetic allergy and patch test sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1985: 12: 76-80.
8. Isaksson M, Gruvberger B. Patch test sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone + methylisothiazolinone and 4,4′- diaminodiphenylmethane. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 53-54.
9. Bruze M. Simultaneous patch test sensitization to 4 chemically unrelated compounds in a standard test series. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 48-49.
10. Isaksson M, Bruze M. Late patch-test reactions to budesonide need not be a sign of sensitization induced by the test procedure. Am J Contact Dermat 2003: 14: 154-156.
11. Goldsmith P C, White I R, Rycroft R J, McFadden J P. Probable active sensitization to tixocortol pivalate. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 429.
12. Le Coz C J, El Bakali A, Untereiner F, Grosshans E. Active sensitization to budesonide and para-phenylenediamine from patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 39: 153-155.
13. Wilkinson S M, Pollock B. Patch test sensitization after use of the Compositae mix. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 277-278.
14. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Alanko K, Jolanki R. Patch test sensitization to Compositae mix, sesquiterpene-lactone mix, Compositae extracts, laurel leaf, Chlorophorin, Mansonone A, and dimethoxydalbergione. Am J Contact Dermat 2001: 12: 18-24.
15. Paulsen E, Andersen K E, Hausen B M. An 8-year experience with routine SL mix patch testing supplemented with Compositae mix in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 29-35.
16. Devos S A, Van Der Valk P G. The risk of active sensitization to PPD. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 273-275.
17. Agrup G. Sensitization induced by patch testing. Br J Dermatol 1968: 80: 631-634.
18. Calnan C D. Studies in contact dermatitis. XX. Active sensitization. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 1967: 53: 128-134.
19. Isaksson M, Andersen K E, Brandao F M et al. Patch testing with corticosteroid mixes in Europe. A multicentre study of the EECDRG. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 27-35.
20. Slodownik D, Ingber A. Late patch test reaction to textile dyes. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 172.
21. Fowler J F Jr. Late patch test reaction to acrylates in a dental worker. Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 224-225.
22. Isaksson M, Lindberg M, Sundberg K, Hallander A, Bruze M. The development and course of patch test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 292-297.
23. Bruze M, Hedman H, Bjorkner B, Moller H. The development and course of test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 33: 386-391.
24. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen O B. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 62-67.
25. Bygum A, Andersen K E. Persistent reactions after patch testing with TRUE Test panels 1 and 2. Contact Dermatitis 1998: 38: 218-220.
26. Johnke H, Norberg L A, Vach W, Bindslev-Jensen C, Host A, Andersen K E. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 51: 141-147.
27. Meneghini C L, Angelini G. Behaviour of contact allergy and new sensitivities on subsequent patch tests. Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 138-142.
28. Jensen C D, Andersen K E. Course of contact allergy in consecutive eczema patients patch tested with TRUE Test panels 1 and 2 at least twice over a 12-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 52: 242-246.
29. Becker D, Mahler V, Szliska C et al. The concentration of para-phenylenediamine (PPD) for routine patch testing in a standard series needs to be redefined. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 186-187.
30. Mcfadden J P, White I R, Johansen J D, Bruze M. Should paraphenylenediamine (PPD) 1% pet. be part of commercially available standard series? Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 183-184.
31. Diepgen T L, Coenraads P J, Wilkinson M, Basketter D A, Lepoittevin J P. Para-phenylendiamine (PPD) 1% pet. is an important allergen in the standard series. Contact Dermatitis 2005: 53: 185.
32. Cronin E. Contact Dermatitis: Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1980: 16.