Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity

American Journal of Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 62-67

  Hindsén, Monica ^a   Bruze, Magnus ^a   Christensen, Ole B ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG; HORMONE; NICKEL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; NICKEL HYPERSENSITIVITY; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN MANIFESTATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

EID: 0033001859     PISSN: 1046199X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1046-199X(99)90001-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allenby GF, Basketter DA: An arm immersion model of compromised skin (II). Influence on minimal eliciting patch test concentration of nickel. Contact Dermatitis 28:129-133, 1993
2. Lindelöf B: Regional variation in patch test response to nickel-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis 26:202-203, 1992
3. Sjövall P: Ultraviolet radiation and allergic contact dermatitis. An experimental and clinical study. Thesis, Malmö, 1988
4. Eun HC, Marks R: Dose-response relationship for topically applied antigens. Br J Dermatol 122:491-499, 1990
5. Condie MW, Adams RM: Influence of oral prednisone on patch-test reactions to Rhus antigen. Arch Dermatol 107:540-543, 1973
6. Alexander S: Patch testing and menstruation. Lancet 2:751, 1988
7. Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen OB: Flare-up reactions after oral challenge with nickel in relation to challenge dose, intensity, and time of previous patch test reactions. Submitted
8. Svensson A, Edman B, Möller H: A diagnostic tool for atopic dermatitis based on clinical criteria. Acta Derm Venereol 114:33-40, 1985
9. Veien NK, Menné T: Acute and recurrent vesicular hand dermatitis, in, Menné T, Maibach HI (eds): Hand Eczema. Boca Raton, CRC, 1994, pp 57-73
10. Bruze M: Seasonal influence on routine patch test results. Contact Dermatitis 14:184, 1986
11. Hindsen M, Bruze M, Christensen OB: The significance of previous allergic contact dermatitis for elicitation of delayed hypersensitivity to nickel. Contact Dermatitis 37:101-106, 1997
12. Memon AA, Friedmann PS: Studies on the reproducibility of allergic contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 134:208-214, 1996
13. Magnusson B, Hersle K: Patch test methods II. Regional variation of patch test responses. Acta Derm Venereol 45:257-261, 1965
14. Kemmett D: Premenstrual exacerbation of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 120:715, 1989
15. Agner T, Damm P, Skouby SO: Menstrual cycle and skin reactivity. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:566-570, 1991
16. McLelland J, Lawrence CM: Premenstrual exacerbation of nickel allergy. Br J Dermatol 125:83, 1991
17. Rohold AE, Halkier Sorensen L, Andersen KE, et al: Nickel patch test reactivity and the menstrual cycle. Acta Derm Venereol 74:383-385, 1994
18. Klas PA, Corey G, Storrs FJ, et al: Allergic and irritant patch test reactions and atopic disease. Contact Dermatitis 34:121-124, 1996
19. Uehara M, Sawai T: A longitudinal study of contact sensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 125:366-368, 1989
20. Lowney ED: Immunologic unresponsiveness to a contact sensitizer in man. J Invest Dermatol 51:411-417, 1968
21. Möller H: Intradermal testing in doubtful cases of contact allergy to metals. Contact Dermatitis 20:120-123, 1989