DeviceNet reliability assessment using physical and data link layer parameters

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 703-715

  Lei, Yong ^a   Djurdjanovic, Dragan ^b   Ni, Jun ^c  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

DeviceNet; physical and data link; reliability assessment

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS METHOD; AUTOMATION SYSTEMS; DATA LINK; DATA LINK LAYER; DEVICENET; HYBRID NETWORK; IMPROVED RELIABILITY; LOG INFORMATION; MAINTENANCE COST; MAINTENANCE DECISION MAKING; NETWORK RELIABILITY; NETWORK RELIABILITY EVALUATION; OFF TIME; PREDICTION ALGORITHMS; RECONFIGURABILITY; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENTS; TIME TO FAILURE;

DECISION MAKING; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; ERROR ANALYSIS; FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; MAINTENANCE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

EID: 78349250892     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1131     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Ye N,. Secure, reliabile computer and network systems. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2002; 18 (3):iii.
2. Prodanov W, Valle M, Buzas R,. A controller area network bus transceiver behavioral model for network designs and simulation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2009; 56 (9): 3762 - 3771.
3. Lei Y, Djurdjanovic D, Barajas L, Workman G, Biller S, Ni J,. DeviceNet network health monitoring using physical layer parameters. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2010; DOI: 10.1007/s10845-009-0291-9.
4. Tindell K, Burns A, Wellings AJ,. Calculating controller area network (can) message response times. Control Engineering Practice 1995; 3 (8): 1163 - 1169.
5. Navet N, Song Y-Q, Simonot F,. Worst-case deadline failure probability in real-time applications distributed over controller area network. Journal of Systems Architecture 2000; 46 (7): 607 - 617.
6. Rufino J, Veríssimo P,. A study on the inaccessibility characteristics of the Controller Area Network. Proceedings of the Second International CAN Conference, CiA, London, England, October 1995; 7.12 - 7.21.
7. Hasson HA, Nolte T, Norstrom C, Punnekkat S,. Integrating reliability and timing analysis of CAN-based systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2002; 49 (6): 1240 - 1250.
8. Lian F-L, Moyne JR, Tilbury DM,. Performance evaluation of control networks: Ethernet, Controlnet, and DeviceNet. Control Systems Magazine, IEEE 2001; 21 (1): 66 - 83.
9. Georges J-P, Rondeau E, Divoux T,. Evaluation of switched ethernet in an industrial context by using the network calculus. Proceedings of Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, Västerås, Sweden, 2002; 19 - 26.
10. Moon H-J, Park H-S, Kim D-W, Kwon W-H,. Analysis of the IEEE 802.4 token-passing mechanism with noise. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation, Maui, Hawaii, U.S.A., vol. 1, 15-18 November 1993. IEEE: New York, 1993; 541 - 546.
11. Moon H-J, Park HS, Ahn SC, Kwon WH,. Performance degradation of the IEEE 802.4 token bus network in a noisy environment. Computer Communications 1998; 21 (6): 547 - 557.
12. Cauffriez L, Conrard B, Thiriet J, Bayart M,. Fieldbuses and their influence on dependability. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 2003. IMTC '03. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE, vol. 1, 2003; 83 - 88.
13. Jumel F, Thiriet J-M, Aubry J-F, Malasse O,. Towards an information-based approach for the dependability evaluation of distributed control systems. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Information and Measurement Technology Conference, Vail, CO, U.S.A., vol. 1, 20-22 May 2003. IEEE: New York, 2003; 270 - 275.
14. Corno F, Perez J, Ramasso M, Sonza Reorda M, Violante M,. Validation of the dependability of can-based networked systems. Proceedings'IEEE International High-level Design Validation and Test Workshop, HLDVT, Sonoma Valley, CA, U.S.A., 2004; 161 - 164. ISSN 1552-6674.
15. Rodriguez-Navas G, Jimenez J, Proenza J,. An architecture for physical injection of complex fault scenarios in can networks. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2003. Proceedings. ETFA '03. IEEE Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, vol. 2, 2003; 125 - 128.
16. Reorda MS, Violante M,. On-line analysis and perturbation of CAN networks. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, Cannes, France, 2004.
17. Tran E,. Multi-bit error vulnerabilities in the controller area network protocol. Master's Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1999.
18. Gaujal B, Navet N,. Fault confinement mechanisms on can: Analysis and improvements. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2005; 54 (3): 1103 - 1113.
19. Ferreira J, Oliveira A, Fonseca P, Fonseca J,. An experiment to assess bit error rate in CAN. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Real-time Networks, Catania, Italy, 2004.
20. ISO11898-1. Road vehicles'controller area network (CAN) part 1: Data link layer and physical signalling, ISO11898-1, 2003.
21. Open DeviceNet Venders Association. DeviceNet Specifications (2.0 edn), 1997.
22. Robert Bosch GmbH. CAN Specification, Version 2.0, 1991.
23. Cassandras CG, Lafortune S,. Introduction to Discrete Event Systems. Springer: Berlin, 1999.
24. Thorsley D, Teneketzis D,. Diagnosability of stochastic automata. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Hawaii, U.S.A., vol. 6, 2003; 6289 - 6294.
25. Ludeman LC,. Random Processes: Filtering, Estimation, and Detection. Wiley: New York, 2003.
26. Kemeny JG, Snell JL,. Finite Markov Chains. Springer: New York, 1976.
27. Molex Incorporated, U.S.A. Available at: [ 2004 ].