Worst-case deadline failure probability in real-time applications distributed over controller area network

Journal of Systems Architecture

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 607-617

  Navet, Nicolas ^a   Song, Ye Qiong ^a   Simonot, François ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ HENRI POINCARÉ NANCY 1   (France)

Author keywords

CAN; Embedded systems; Error model; Fault tolerance; Real time systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001646545     PISSN: 13837621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1383-7621(99)00016-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J. Barrenscheen, G. Otte, Analysis of the physical CAN bus layer, in: Fourth International CAN Conference, ICC'97, October 1997, pp. 6.02-6.08.
2. Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR), Véhicules routiers - Transmission de données, document R13-708, December 1990.
3. SAE Vehicle Network for Multiplexing and Data Communications Standards Committee, Class B Data Communications Network Interface, SAE J1850 Standard, Rev., November 1996.
4. P. Hank, Pelican: a new CAN controller supporting diagnosis and system optimization, in: Fourth International CAN Conference, ICC'97, 1997, pp. 04.12-04.18.
5. G. Hausmann, E. Gebing, The realisation of specific automotive applications with full CAN functionality at basic can cost on highly integrated 8-bit microcontroller of nec's 78K/0 Family, In: Fourth International CAN Conference, ICC'97, 1997, pp. 4.02-4.11.
6. International Standard Organization ISO, Road Vehicles -Interchange of Digital Information - Controller Area Network for high-speed Communication ISO, ISO 11898, 1994.
7. International Standard Organization ISO, Road Vehicles -Low Speed serial data communication - Part 2: Low Speed Controller Area Network, ISO, ISO 11519-2, 1994.
8. W. Lawrenz, CAN System Engineering, Springer, Berlin, ISBN 0-387-94939-9, 1997.
9. N. Navet, Y.-Q. Song, Evaluation de performances de la messagerie can du véhicule prototype psa - action 1 du contrat psa-crin, Technical report, Centre de Recherche en Informatique de Nancy (CRIN), Contract report 96-R-182, 1996.
10. N. Navet, Y.-Q. Song, Une Politique à changement de priorité pour l'ordonnancement de messages dans des environnements bruités, in: CFIP'99, to appear.
11. I.E. Noble, Emc and the automotive industry, Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal October (1992) 263-271.
12. E. Parzen, Stochastic Processes, Holden-Day, San Francisco, ISBN 0-8162-6664-6, 1962.
13. The Risks Digest, GM car acceleration due to emi, http:// catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/19.38.html, 19 (38) (1997).
14. The Risks Digest. Mad bus disease, http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/ Risks/19.40.html, 19 (40) (1997).
15. K. Tindell, A. Burns, Guaranteed message latencies for distributed safety-critical hard real-time control networks, Technical report, Department of Computer Science University of York (UK), 1994, Technical Report YCS229.
16. K. Tindell, A. Burns, Guaranteeing message latencies on controller area network (CAN), In: First International CAN Conference, ICC'94 1994.
17. K. Tindell, A. Burns, A.J. Wellings, Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times, Control Engineering Practice 3 (8) (1995) 1163-1169.
18. J. Unruh, H.-J. Mathony, K.-H. Kaiser, Error detection analysis of automotive communication protocols, Technical report, Robert Bosch GmbH, 1989.
19. E. Zanoni, P. Pavan, Improving the reliability and safety of automotive electronics, IEEE Micro 13 (1) (1993) 30-48.
20. C. Ziegler, D. Powell, P. Desroches, Dependability of on-board automotive computer systems, In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles 1994 Symposium, 1994, pp. 568-575.