Value-centric design methodologies for fractionated spacecraft: Progress summary from phase 1 of the DARPA System F6 program

AIAA Space 2009 Conference and Exposition

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Brown, Owen C ^a   Eremenko, Paul ^a   Collopy, Paul D ^b  

^a DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY   (United States)

^b Value Driven Design Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATED TOOL; COST PENALTY; DESIGN EFFORT; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; DESIGN TOOL; LOCKHEED MARTIN; MILITARY AEROSPACE SYSTEMS; MISSION CAPABILITY; NETWORKED CLUSTERS; NORTHROP GRUMMAN; ORBITAL SCIENCES; PARALLEL DEVELOPMENT; PHASE 1; PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE; PROBABILISTIC DISTRIBUTION; SATELLITE SYSTEM; SPACE ARCHITECTURE; SPACE INDUSTRY; STANDARD SYSTEM; TRADITIONAL INDUSTRY; VALUE ENHANCEMENT;

ARCHITECTURE; INDUSTRY; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SATELLITES; SPACE FLIGHT;

DESIGN;

EID: 77958518602     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. McCormick, D., Barrett, B., and Burnside-Clapp, M., "Analyzing Fractionated Satellite Architectures Using RAFTIMATE - A Boeing Tool for Value-Centric Design," AIAA Paper 2009-6767, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009.
2. Maciuca, D., et al., "A Modular, High-Fidelity Tool to Model the Utility of Fractionated Space Systems," AIAA Paper 2009-6765, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009.
3. Hill, L., Leavitt, K., Voshell, W., and Weigel, A., "A Value Centric Design Approach to Earth Observing Missions," AIAA Paper 2009-6764, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009.
4. Eichenberg-Bicknell, E., Wisniewski, M. J., Choi, S. W., and Westley, D. M., "Using a Value-centric Tool Framework to Optimize Lifecycle Cost, Value, and Risk of Spacecraft Architectures," AIAA Paper 2009-6766, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2009.
5. Brown, O., and Eremenko, P., "The Value Proposition for Fractionated Space Architectures," AIAA Paper 2006-7506, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2006.
6. Brown, O., and Eremenko, P., "Fractionated Space Architectures: A Vision for Responsive Space," AIAA Paper RS4-2006-1002, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2006.
7. Brown, O., Long, A., Shah, N., and Eremenko, P., "System Lifecycle Cost Under Uncertainty as a Design Metric Encompassing the Value of Architectural Flexibility," AIAA Paper 2007-6023, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2007.
8. Brown, O., and Eremenko, P., "Application of Value-Centric Design to Space Architectures: The Case of Fractionated Spacecraft," AIAA Paper 2008-7869, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2008.
9. Saleh, J. H., "Flawed Metrics: Satellite Cost per Transponder and Cost per Day," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 44, No. 1, January, 2008, pages 147-156.
10. Hazelrigg, G. A., Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996.
11. Arrow, K. J., "Exposition of the Theory of Choice Under Uncertainty," Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, Markham Publishing, Chicago, 1971, pp. 44-89.
12. Luenberger, D. G., "The Basic Theory of Interest," Investment Science, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998, pp. 13- 39.
13. Luenberger, D. G., INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook, Version 2.0, International Council on Systems Engineering, URL: http://www.incose.org/ ProductsPubs/products/sehandbook.aspx, 2000.
14. Kapurch, S. A., et al., NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, Rev. 1 NASA SP2007-6105, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 2007.
15. Collopy, P. D., "Aerospace System Value Models: A Survey and Observations," AIAA Paper 2009-6560, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2009.
16. Collopy, P. D., "Balancing Risk and Value in System Development," AIAA Paper 2003-6376, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2003.
17. Dubos, G. F., Saleh, J. H., Braun, R., "Technology Readiness Level, Schedule Risk and Slippage in Spacecraft Design: Data Analysis and Modeling," AIAA Paper 2007-6020, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2007.
18. Collopy, P. D., "Economic-Based Distributed Optimal Design," AIAA Paper 2001-4675, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2001.
19. Collopy, P. D., "A System for Values, Leadership and Communications in Product Design," International Powered Lift Conference Proceedings, P-306, SAE Publications, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1997, pp. 95 - 98.
20. Collopy, P. D., "Value-Driven Design and the Global Positioning System," AIAA Paper 2006-7213, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2006.
21. Collopy, P. D., "Adverse Impact of Extensive Attribute Requirements on the Design of Complex Systems," AIAA Paper 2007-7820, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2007.
22. st edition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
23. Schwenn, R. E., Brink, H., Mebane, C. T., Seales, S. C., and Wintfeld, J. R., Defense Acquisitions: Assessment of Selected Weapon Programs, Report GAO-09-326SP, United States Government Accountability Office, March, 2009. Figures were drawn from the table on the Highlights page at the front of the report.
24. th edition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 1997. See page 105 for cost growth and page 153 for schedule growth.
25. Carter, A. B., and White, J. P., Keeping the Edge: Managing Defense for the Future, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001, pp. 194-202.
26. Harwick, W. T., "A Survey of Space Cost Models," American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, Vol. 420, pages 956-961, January 15, 1998.
27. Eck, D., et al., Parametric Estimating Handbook, 4th ed., International Society of Parametric Analysis, Vienna, Virginia, April, 2008.
28. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York, 1976.
29. Saleh, J. H., et. al., "Flexibility and the Value of On-Orbit Servicing: New Customer-Centric Perspective," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 40, No. 2, March-April 2003, pp. 279-291.
30. Olivier L. de Weck, O. L., de Neufville, R., and Chaize, M., "Enhancing the Economics of Communications Satellites via Orbital Reconfigurations and Staged Deployment," AIAA Paper 2003-6317, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2003.
31. Silver, M. R., and de Weck, O. L., "Time-Expanded Decision Networks: A Framework for Designing Evolvable Complex Systems," Systems Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 2, May 2007, pages 167-188.
32. Mathieu, C., and Weigel, A. L., "Assessing the Fractionated Spacecraft Concept," AIAA Paper 2006-7212, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virginia, 2006.