Support for collaborative multimedia learning: Considering the individual and the group

Proceedings - ICCE 2008: 16th International Conference on Computers in Education

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 245-252

  Bodemer, Daniel ^a   Scholvien, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Group awareness; Multiple external representations; Representational guidance; Representational tool

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROCESS; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; GROUP AWARENESS; MULTIMEDIA LEARNING; MULTIPLE EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 78249235458     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Kozma, R. B. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
2. Dillenbourg, P., & Bétrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration Load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling Complexity in Learning Environments: Theory and Research (pp. 142-163). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. (Pubitemid 43717601)
4. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
5. Kalyuga, S. (2008). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 852-861. (Pubitemid 351305134)
6. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 325-341. (Pubitemid 39216292)
7. Bodemer, D., & Faust, U. (2006). External and mental referencing of multiple representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 27-42. (Pubitemid 41394956)
8. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69-97). Berlin: Springer.
9. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
10. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219.
11. Vahey, P., Enyedy, N., & Gifford, B. (2000). The Probability Inquiry Environment: Learning probability Through the use of a collaborative, inquiry-based simulation environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 51-84.
12. Rebetez, C., Sangin, M., Bétrancourt, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (in press). Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Sciences.
13. Saab, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2005). Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 603-621. (Pubitemid 41756141)
14. Sangin, M., Dillenbourg, P., Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., & Molinari. M. (in press). The effects of animations on verbal interaction in computer supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
15. Schnotz, W. (1999). Visual learning with new technologies: Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 163-165.
16. Kozma, R. B. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 11-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Ploetzner, R., Fehse, E., Kneser, C., & Spada, H. (1999). Learning to relate qualitative and quantitative problem representations in a model-based setting for collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 177-214.
18. Buder, J. (2007). Net-Based Knowledge Communication in Groups. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 21(4), 209-217.
19. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington: APA.
20. Dillenbourg, P. (2006). The solo/duo gap. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 155-159. (Pubitemid 41394963)
21. Bromme, R., Hesse, F. W., & Spada, H. (2005). Barriers, biases and opportunities of communication and cooperation with computers: Introduction and overview. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication - and how they may be overcome (pp. 1-14). New York: Springer.
22. Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (in press). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.
23. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(2), 181-192.