Injunctions, hold-up, and patent royalties

American Law and Economics Review

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 280-318

  Shapiro, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149483989     PISSN: 14657252     EISSN: 14657260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aler/ahq014     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bessen, James, and Robert M. Hunt. 2007. "An Empirical Look at Software Patents," 16(1) Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 1157-89.
2. Bessen, James, and Michael J. Meurer. 2008. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Binmore, Ken, Avner Shaked, and John Sutton. 1989. "An Outside Option Experiment," 104(4) Quarterly Journal of Economics 4753-70.
4. Boldrin, Michele, and David K. Levine. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Burk, Dan L., and Mark A. Lemley. 2009. The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Calebresi, Guido, and A. Douglas Melamud. 1972. "Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral," 85(6) Harvard Law Review 61089-128.
7. Cohen, Julie E., and Mark A. Lemley. 2001. "Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry," 89(1) California Law Review 11-58.
8. Denicolò, Vincenzo, Damien Geradin, Anne Layne-Farrar, and A. Jorge Padilla. 2008. "Revisiting Injunctive Relief: Interpreting eBay in High-Tech Industries with Non-Practicing Patent Holders," 4(3) Journal of Competition Law and Economics 3571-608.
9. Elhauge, Einer. 2008. "Do Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking Lead to Systematically Excessive Royalties?" 4(3) Journal of Competition Law and Economics 3535-70.
10. Farrell, Joseph, and Carl Shapiro. 2008. "How Strong Are Weak Patents?" 98(4) The American Economic Review 41347-69. Available at: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/weak.
11. Federal Trade Commission. 2003. To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance Between Competition and Patent Law and Policy. October, Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovationrpt.pdf.
12. Gallini, Nancy. 2002. "The Economics of Patents: Lessons From Recent U.S. Patent Reform," 16(2) The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2131-54.
13. Golden, John M. 2007. "Commentary: 'Patent Trolls' and Patent Remedies," 85(7) Texas Law Review 72111-61.
14. Hall, Bronwyn, and Rose Marie Ziedonis. 2001. "The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995," 32 The Rand Journal of Economics 101-28.
15. Heller, Michael. 2008. The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives. New York: Basic Books.
16. Heller, Michael, and Rebecca Eisenberg. 1998. "Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti-Commons in Biomedical Research," 280 Science 698-701.
17. Jaffe, Adam, and Josh Lerner. 2004. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Kaplow, Louis, and Steven Shavell. 1996. "Property Rules Versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis," 109(4) Harvard Law Review 4713-90.
19. Lemley, Mark, and Carl Shapiro. 2005. "Probabilistic Patents," 19(2) Journal of Economic Perspectives 275-98. Available at: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/patents.pdf.
20. Lemley, Mark, and Carl Shapiro. 2007a. "Patent Hold-Up and Royalty Stacking," 85(7) Texas Law Review 71991-2049. Available at: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/stacking.pdf.
21. Lemley, Mark, and Carl Shapiro. 2007b. "Patent Hold-Up and Royalty Stacking: Reply," 85(7) Texas Law Review 72163-73.
22. Leonard, Gregory, Lauren Stiroh, eds. (2005). Economic Approaches to Intellectual Property: Policy, Litigation and Management. White Plains, NY: National Economic Research Associates, Inc.
23. National Academies of Science. 2004. A Patent System for the 21st Century. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309089107/html.
24. Shapiro, Carl. 2001. "Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross-Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting" in Jaffe Adam Lerner Joshua and Stern Scott, eds., Innovation Policy and the Economy National Bureau of Economics. Available at: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/thicket.pdf.
25. Shapiro, Carl. 2006. "Prior User Rights," 96(2) American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 292-6. Available at: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/prior.pdf.
26. Shapiro, Carl. 2007. "Patent Reform: Aligning Reward and Contribution" in Jaffe Adam Lerner Josh and Stern Scott, eds., 8 Innovation Policy and the Economy National Bureau of Economic Research 111-56. Available at: http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/align.pdf.
27. Sidak, J. Gregory. 2008. "Holdup, Royalty Stacking, and the Presumption of Injunctive Relief for Patent Infringement: A Reply to Lemley and Shapiro," 92(3) Minnesota Law Review 3714-48.