Biomechanical consequences of humeral component malpositioning after anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1184-1190

  Terrier, Alexandre ^a   Ramondetti, Silvio ^a   Merlini, Francesco ^a   Pioletti, Dominique D ^a   Farron, Alain ^b  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Basic Science Study; Biomechanics; Humeral head; Impingements; Malpositioning; Mobility; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; HUMAN; HUMERUS; MODEL; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; SHOULDER; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; HUMERAL HEAD; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SHOULDER JOINT; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 78149412905     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bohsali K.I., Wirth M.A., Rockwood C.A. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:2279-2292. 88/10/2279 [pii], doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00125.
2. Boileau P., Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997, 79:857-865. 10.1302/0301-620X.79B5.7579.
3. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59:954-962.
4. Favre P., Moor B., Snedeker J.G., Gerber C. Influence of component positioning on impingement in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008, 23:175-183. S0268-0033(07)00210-0 [pii], doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.009.
5. Flatow E.L., Soslowsky L.J., Ticker J.B., Pawluk R.J., Hepler M., Ark J., et al. Excursion of the rotator cuff under the acromion. Patterns of subacromial contact. Am J Sports Med 1994, 22:779-788.
6. Graichen H., Stammberger T., Bonel H., Haubner M., Englmeier K.H., Reiser M., et al. Magnetic resonance-based motion analysis of the shoulder during elevation. Clin Orthop 2000, 154-163.
7. Kelkar R., Wang V.M., Flatow E.L., Newton P.M., Ateshian G.A., Bigliani L.U., et al. Glenohumeral mechanics: a study of articular geometry, contact, and kinematics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001, 10:73-84.
8. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res 1997, 38:155-182. 10.1002/jbm.b.31220.
9. Mansat P., Barea C., Hobatho M.C., Darmana R., Mansat M. Anatomic variation of the mechanical properties of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998, 7:109-115.
10. Massimini DF, Li G, Warner JJ. Glenohumeral articular contact kinematics of patients after total shoulder arthroplasty. In: 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 2008, San Francisco; 2008.
11. Nyffeler R.W., Sheikh R., Jacob H.A., Gerber C. Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86A:575-580.
12. Pearl M.L., Kurutz S. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999, 81:660-671.
13. Pearl M.L., Kurutz S., Postachini R. Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: how much prosthetic geometry is necessary?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 18:366-370. S1058-2746(09)00076-7 [pii], doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.011.
14. Poppen N.K., Walker P.S. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin Orthop 1978, 165-170.
15. Rho J.Y., Hobatho M.C., Ashman R.B. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 1995, 17:347-355. 10.1016/1350-4533(95)97314-F.
16. Soslowsky L.J., Flatow E.L., Bigliani L.U., Pawluk R.J., Ateshian G.A., Mow V.C. Quantitation of in situ contact areas at the glenohumeral joint: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Res 1992, 10:524-534. 10.1002/jor.1100100407.
17. Terrier A., Merlini F., Pioletti D.P., Farron A. Comparison of polyethylene wear in anatomical and reversed shoulder prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:977-982. 91-B/7/977 [pii], doi:10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21999.
18. Terrier A., Merlini F., Pioletti D.P., Farron A. Total shoulder arthroplasty: Downward inclination of the glenoid component to balance supraspinatus deficiency. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 18:360-365. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.008.
19. Terrier A., Reist A., Merlini F., Farron A. Simulated joint and muscle forces in reversed and anatomic shoulder prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:751-756. 90-B/6/751 [pii], doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.19708.
20. Terrier A., Reist A., Vogel A., Farron A. Effect of supraspinatus deficiency on humerus translation and glenohumeral contact force during abduction. Clin Biomech 2007, 22:645-651. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.01.015.
21. Terrier A., Vogel A., Capezzali M., Farron A. An algorithm to allow humerus translation in the indeterminate problem of shoulder abduction. Med Eng Phys 2008, 30:710-716. S1350-4533(07)00148-8 [pii], doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.07.011.
22. van der Helm F.C. Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism. J Biomech 1994, 27:527-550. 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90064-7.
23. Westerhoff P., Graichen F., Bender A., Halder A., Beier A., Rohlmann A., et al. In vivo measurement of shoulder joint loads during activities of daily living. J Biomech 2009, 42:1840-1849. S0021-9290(09)00316-9 [pii], doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.035.
24. Williams G.R., Wong K.L., Pepe M.D., Tan V., Silverberg D., Ramsey M.L., et al. The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001, 10:399-409. 10.1067/mse.2001.116871.
25. Wirth M.A., Ondrla J., Southworth C., Kaar K., Anderson B.C., Rockwood C.A. Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007, 16:S111-S116. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.008.