In vivo measurement of shoulder joint loads during activities of daily living

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1840-1849

  Westerhoff, P ^a   Graichen, F ^a   Bender, A ^a,b   Halder, A ^c   Beier, A ^c   Rohlmann, A ^a   Bergmann, G ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Berlin Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies   (Germany)

^c Klinik für Endoprothetik Sommerfeld   (Germany)

Author keywords

In vivo; Load measurement; Shoulder joint; Telemetry

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AVERAGE FORCE; BODY WEIGHT; CONTACT FORCES; CONTACT LOAD; DAILY LIVING; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; HEAD HEIGHT; HIGH LOAD; IN VIVO; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO MEASUREMENT; JOINT CONTACT FORCES; JOINT REPLACEMENT; LOAD MEASUREMENT; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION CRITERIA; SHOULDER JOINT; SHOULDER JOINTS; SHOULDER MODELS; TELEMETRY;

JOINT PROSTHESES; OPTIMIZATION; RAILROAD ROLLING STOCK; SHOULDERS (ROAD); TELEMETERING; TELEMETERING EQUIPMENT;

LOADS (FORCES);

ABDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CALCULATION; CASE REPORT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SHOULDER; WEIGHT BEARING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LIFTING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 68249138695     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.035     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anglin C., Wyss U.P., and Pichora D.R. Glenohumeral contact forces. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] 214 (2000) 637-644
2. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., and Duda G.N. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 859-871
3. Bergmann, G., Graichen, F., Bender, A., Dymke, J., Rohlmann, A., Halder, A., Beier, A., Westerhoff, P., 2008, Loading of the glenohumeral Joint during everyday life, 16th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, Lucerne, Switzerland.
4. Bergmann G., Graichen F., Bender A., Kaab M., Rohlmann A., and Westerhoff P. In vivo glenohumeral contact forces-measurements in the first patient 7 months postoperatively. J. Biomech. 40 (2007) 2139-2149
5. Bergmann G., Graichen F., and Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 969-990
6. Favre P., Sheikh R., Fucentese S.F., and Jacob H.A. An algorithm for estimation of shoulder muscle forces for clinical use. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 20 (2005) 822-833
7. Graichen F., Arnold R., Rohlmann A., and Bergmann G. Implantable 9-channel telemetry system for in vivo load measurements with orthopedic implants. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 (2007) 253-261
8. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Durselen L., Pohl M., Claes L., Haas N.P., and Duda G.N. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J. Biomech. 34 (2001) 883-893
9. Karduna A.R., Williams G.R., Iannotti J.P., and Williams J.L. Total shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics: a study of the forces and strains at the glenoid component. J. Biomech. Eng. 120 (1998) 92-99
10. Kummer F.J., Lyon T.R., and Zuckerman J.D. Development of a telemeterized shoulder prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1996) 31-34
11. De Wilde L.F., A E.A., and B B.M. Shoulder prostheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative biomechanical study. J. Orthop. Res. 22 (2004) 1222-1230
12. Poppen N.K., and Walker P.S. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1978) 165-170
13. Rasmussen, J., Mark, d.Z., Torholm, Soren, Damsgaard, Michael, 2007, Comparison of a musculoskeletal Shoulder Model with in-vivo Joint Forces, The Proceedings of the XXI Congress of International Society of Biomechanics (ISB 2007), Taipei, Taiwan, S67.
14. Stansfield B.W., Nicol A.C., Paul J.P., Kelly I.G., Graichen F., and Bergmann G. Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. J. Biomech. 36 (2003) 929-936
15. Terrier A., Reist A., Merlini F., and Farron A. Simulated joint and muscle forces in reversed and anatomic shoulder prostheses. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. Vol. 90 (2008) 751-756
16. van Andel C.J., Wolterbeek N., Doorenbosch C.A.M., Veeger D., and Harlaar J. Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. Gait Posture 27 (2008) 120
17. van der Helm F.C. Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism. J. Biomech. 27 (1994) 527-550
18. Veeger H.E., Magermans D.J., Nagels J., Chadwick E.K., and van der Helm F.C. A kinematical analysis of the shoulder after arthroplasty during a hair combing task. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 21 Suppl 1 (2006) S39-S44
19. Veeger H.E., van der Helm F.C., Chadwick E.K., and Magermans D. Toward standardized procedures for recording and describing 3-D shoulder movements. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 35 (2003) 440-446
20. Westerhoff P., Graichen F., Bender A., Rohlmann A., and Bergmann G. An instrumented implant for in vivo measurement of contact forces and contact moments in the shoulder joint. Med. Eng. Phys. (2008)
21. Wu G., van der Helm F.C., Veeger H.E., Makhsous M., Van Roy P., Anglin C., Nagels J., Karduna A.R., McQuade K., Wang X., Werner F.W., and Buchholz B. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J. Biomech. 38 (2005) 981-992