Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: A radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Wirth, Michael A ^a   Ondrla, Jeff ^b   Southworth, Carleton ^c   Kaar, Ken ^d   Anderson, Brett C ^a   Rockwood III, Charles A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b DVO Extremity Solutions   (United States)

^c Synthes Technical Center   (United States)

^d Merlin Park University Hospital   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HUMERUS; JOINT MOBILITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SHOULDER GIRDLE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CADAVER; HUMANS; HUMERUS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 34247551634     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ballmer F.T., Sidles J.A., Lippitt S.B., and Matsen III F.A. Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: surgically relevant geometric considerations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2 (1993) 296-304
2. Boileau P., and Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus: implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 (1997) 857-865
3. Harryman D.T., Sidles J.A., Harris S.L., Lippitt S.B., and Matsen III F.A. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77 (1995) 555-563
4. Hertel R., Knothe U., and Ballmer F.T. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 331-338
5. Iannotti J.P., Gabriel J.P., Schneck S.L., Evans B.G., and Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships: an anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 (1992) 491-500
6. Karduna A.R., Williams G.R., Williams J.L., and Iannotti J.P. Joint stability after total shoulder arthroplasty in a cadaver model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6 (1997) 506-511
7. McPherson E.J., Friedman R.J., An Y.H., Chokesi R., and Dooley R.L. Anthropometric study of normal glenohumeral relationships. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6 (1997) 105-112
8. Pearl M.L. Proximal humeral anatomy in shoulder arthroplasty: implications for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14 Suppl S (2005) 99S-104S
9. Pearl M.L., and Kurutz S. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 (1999) 660-671
10. Pearl M.L., Kurutz S., Robertson D.D., and Yamaguchi K. Geometric analysis of selected press fit prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Orthop Res 20 (2002) 192-197
11. Pearl M.L., and Volk A.G. Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4 (1995) 286-289
12. Walch G., and Boileau P. Morphological study of the humeral proximal epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 Suppl 1 (1992) 14
13. Williams Jr. G.R., Wong K.L., Pepe M.D., Tan V., Silverberg D., Ramsey M.L., et al. The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10 (2001) 399-409