Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: How much prosthetic geometry is necessary?

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 366-370

  Pearl, Michael L ^a   Kurutz, Sam ^a   Postachini, Roberto ^b  

^a LOS ANGELES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

humeral prosthetic design; offset; proximal humeral geometry inclination; Total shoulder arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HUMERUS HEAD; JOINT FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SHOULDER PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; HUMERUS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; PROBABILITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER JOINT; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 64849110783     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Boileau P., and Walch G. The combined offset (medial and posterior) of the humeral sphere. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3 (1994) S65
2. Boileau P., and Walc G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus, implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg 79-B (1997) 857-865
3. Boileau P., Walch G., and Liotard J.P. Cineradiographic study of active elevation of the prosthetic shoulder. J Orthop Surg 6 (1992) 351-359
4. Harryman D.T., Sidles J.A., Harris S.L., and Lippitt S.B. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplsty: a study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77A (1995) 555-563
5. Hertel R., and Ballmer F.T. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 331-338
6. Karduna A.R., Williams G.R., Williams J.L., and Iannotti J.P. Glenohumeral joint translations before and after total shoulder arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 1166-1174
7. Karduna A.R., Williams G.R., Williams J.L., and Iannotti J.P. Joint stability after total shoulder arthroplasty in a cadaver model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6 (1997) 506-511
8. Pearl M.L., and Kurutz S. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 (1999) 660-671
9. Pearl M.L., Kurutz S., Robertson D.D., and Yamaguchi K. Geometric analysis of selected press fit prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Orthop Res 20 (2002) 192-197
10. Pearl M.L., and Volk A.G. Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5 (1996) 320-326
11. Pearl M.L., and Volk A.G. Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4 (1995) 286-289
12. Robertson D.D., Yuan J., Bigliani L.U., Flatow E.L., and Yamaguchi K. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A (2000) 1594-1602
13. Williams G.R., Wong D.L., Pepe M.D., Ta V., Siverberg D., Ramsey M.L., et al. The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translation, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10 (2001) 399-409
14. Wirth M.A., Ondrla J., Southworth C., Kaar K., Anderson B.C., and Rockwood C.A. Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: A radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16 (2007) 11S-16S