AnCora-CO: Coreferentially annotated corpora for Spanish and Catalan

Language Resources and Evaluation

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 315-345

  Recasens, Marta ^a   Martí, M Antònia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anaphora; Annotation scheme; Coreference; Corpus annotation; Reliability study

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149409865     PISSN: 1574020X     EISSN: 15728412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-009-9108-x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1), 65-87.
2. Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2005). Bias decreases in proportion to the number of annotators. In Proceedings of FG-MoL 2005 (pp. 141-150). Edinburgh.
3. Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4), 555-596.
4. Baldwin, B. (1997). CogNIAC: High precision coreference with limited knowledge and linguistic resources. In Proceedings of the ACL-EACL 1997 workshop on operational factors in practical, robust anaphor resolution for unrestricted texts (pp. 38-45). Madrid.
5. Bertran, M., Borrega, O., Recasens, M., & Soriano, B. (2008). AnCoraPipe: A tool for multilevel annotation. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 41, 291-292.
6. Blackwell, S. (2003). Implicatures in discourse: The case of Spanish NP anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Borrega, O., Taulé, M., & Martí, M. A. (2007). What do we mean when we talk about named entities?. In Proceedings of the 4th corpus linguistics conference, Birmingham.
8. Bosque, I., & Demonte, V. (Eds.) (1999). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe.
9. Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249-254.
10. Clark, H. H. (1977). Bridging. In P. Johnson-Laird, & P. C. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 411-420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Doddington, G., Mitchell, A., Przybocki, M., Ramshaw, L., Strassel, S., & Weischedel, R. (2004). The Automatic Content Extraction (ACE) program-Tasks, data, and evaluation. In Proceedings of LREC 2004 (pp. 837-840). Lisbon.
12. Eckert, M., & Strube, M. (2000). Dialogue acts, synchronising units and anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 17(1), 51-89.
13. Fraurud, K. (1990). Definiteness and the processing of NPs in natural discourse. Journal of Semantics, 7, 395-433.
14. Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274-307.
15. Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
16. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77-89.
17. Hinrichs, E., Kübler, S., Naumann, K., Telljohann, H., & Trushkina, J. (2004). Recent developments in linguistic annotations of the TüBa-D/Z treebank. In Proceedings of TLT 2004, Tübingen.
18. Hirschman, L., & Chinchor, N. (1997). MUC-7 coreference task definition-Version 3. 0.
19. Hobbs, J. R. (1978). Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44, 311-338.
20. Hoste, V. (2005). Optimization issues in machine learning of coreference resolution. PhD Thesis, University of Antwerp.
21. Hovy, E., Marcus, M., Palmer, M., Ramshaw, L., & Weischedel, R. (2006). OntoNotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2006 (pp. 57-60). New York.
22. Ide, N. (2000). Searching annotated language resources in XML: A statement of the problem. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2000 workshop on XML and information retrieval, Athens.
23. Kilgarriff, A. (1999). 95% replicability for manual word sense tagging. In Proceedings of EACL 1999 (pp. 277-278). Bergen.
24. Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker's reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, 255-276.
25. Krippendorff, K. (2004 [1980]). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chapter 11.
26. Kučová, L., & Hajičová, E. (2004). Coreferential relations in the Prague dependency treebank. In Proceedings of DAARC 2004 (pp. 97-102). San Miguel, Azores.
27. Lappin, S., & Leass, H. J. (1994). An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4), 535-561.
28. Luo, X., Ittycheriah, A., Jing, H., Kambhatla, N., & Roukos, S. (2004). A mention-synchronous coreference resolution algorithm based on the Bell tree. In Proceedings of ACL 2004 (pp. 21-26). Barcelona.
29. McCarthy, J. F., & Lehnert, W. G. (1995). Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of IJCAI 1995 (pp. 1050-1055). Montréal.
30. Mengel, A., Dybkjaer, L., Garrido, J. M., Heid, U., Klein, M., Pirrelli, V., et al. (2000). MATE deliverable D2. 1 - MATE dialogue annotation guidelines. http://www. ims. uni-stuttgart. de/projekte/mate/mdag.
31. Mitkov, R. (1998). Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL 1998 (pp. 869-875). Montréal.
32. Mitkov, R., Evans, R., Orasan, C., Barbu, C., Jones, L., & Sotirova, V. (2000). Coreference and anaphora: developing annotating tools, annotated resources and annotation strategies. In Proceedings of DAARC 2000 (pp. 49-58). Lancaster.
33. Morton, T. S. (1999). Using coreference in question answering. In Proceedings of TREC-8 (pp. 85-89). Gaithersburg, MD.
34. MŸller, C., & Strube, M. (2006). Multi-level annotation of linguistic data with MMAX2. In S. Braun, K. Kohn, & J. Mukherjee (Eds.), Corpus technology and language pedagogy: New resources, new tools, new methods (pp. 197-214). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
35. Navarretta, C. (2007). A contrastive analysis of abstract anaphora in Danish, English and Italian. In Proceedings of DAARC 2007 (pp. 103-109). Lagos.
36. Ng, V., & Cardie, C. (2002). Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of ACL 2002 (pp. 104-111). Philadelphia.
37. Orasan, C. (2003). PALinkA: A highly customisable tool for discourse annotation. In Proceedings of the 4th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue (pp. 39-43). Sapporo.
38. Orasan, C., Cristea, D., Mitkov, R., & Branco, A. (2008). Anaphora resolution exercise: An overview. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech.
39. Passonneau, R. (2004). Computing reliability for coreference annotation. In Proceedings of LREC 2004 (pp. 1503-1506). Lisbon.
40. Passonneau, R. (2006). Measuring agreement on set-valued items (MASI) for semantic and pragmatic annotation. In Proceedings of LREC 2006 (pp. 831-836). Genoa.
41. Poesio, M. (2004a). Discourse annotation and semantic annotation in the GNOME corpus. In Proceedings of the ACL 2004 workshop on discourse annotation (pp. 72-79). Barcelona.
42. Poesio, M. (2004b). The MATE/GNOME proposals for anaphoric annotation, revisited. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial workshop at HLT-NAACL 2004 (pp. 154-162). Boston.
43. Poesio, M., & Artstein, R. (2008). Anaphoric annotation in the ARRAU corpus. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech.
44. Poesio, M., & Vieira, R. (1998). A corpus-based investigation of definite description use. Computational Linguistics 24(2), 183-216.
45. Pradhan, S. S., Ramshaw, L., Weischedel, R., MacBride, J., & Micciulla, L. (2007). Unrestricted coreference: Identifying entities and events in OntoNotes. In Proceedings of ICSC 2007 (pp. 446-453). Irvine, CA.
46. Recasens, M., Martí, M. A., & Taulé, M. (2009a). First-mention definites: More than exceptional cases. In S. Featherston, & S. Winkler (Eds.), The fruits of empirical linguistics (pp. 169-189). Berlin: De Gruyter.
47. Recasens, M., Martí, M. A., Taulé, M., Màrquez, L., & Sapena, E. (2009b). SemEval-2010 Task 1: Coreference resolution in multiple languages. In Proceedings of the NAACL 2009 workshop on semantic evaluations: Recent achievements and future directions (pp. 70-75). Boulder, CO.
48. Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, Chap. 9. 8 (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
49. Solà, J. (Ed.). (2002). Gramàtica del català contemporani. Barcelona: Empúries.
50. Soon, W. M., Ng, H. T., & Lim, D. C. Y. (2001). A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4), 521-544.
51. Stede, M. (2004). The potsdam commentary corpus. In Proceedings of the ACL 2004 workshop on discourse annotation (pp. 96-102). Barcelona.
52. Steinberger, J., Poesio, M., Kabadjov, M. A., & Jeek, K. (2007). Two uses of anaphora resolution in summarization. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, 43(6), 1663-1680.
53. Taboada, M. (2008). Reference, centers and transitions in spoken Spanish. In J. Gundel & N. Hedberg (Eds.), Reference and reference processing (pp. 176-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Taulé, M., Martí, M. A., & Recasens, M. (2008). AnCora: Multilevel annotated corpora for Catalan and Spanish. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech.
55. van Deemter, K., & Kibble, R. (2000). On coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 629-637.
56. Webber, B. L. (1979). A formal approach to discourse anaphora. New York: Garland Press.
57. Webber, B. L. (1988). Discourse deixis: Reference to discourse segments. In Proceedings of ACL 1988 (pp. 113-122). Buffalo, New York.
58. Zaenen, A. (2006). Mark-up barking up the wrong tree. Computational Linguistics, 32(4), 577-580.