Epithelial responses to rubbing-related mechanical forces

Cornea

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1223-1231

  McMonnies, Charles W ^a   Alharbi, Ahmed ^a   Boneham, Gavin C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

cell mechanics; cornea; epithelium; pachymetry; rubbing

Indexed keywords

MUCIN; WATER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CORNEA PERFORATION; CORNEA STROMA; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE INJURY; EYE REFRACTION; FORCE; FORELIMB; HUMAN; INTERCELLULAR SPACE; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; TISSUE REACTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; CORNEA; CORNEAL STROMA; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; EYE; EYE INJURIES; HUMANS; MASSAGE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149285632     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181d3d660     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Greiner JV, Leahy CD, Welter DA, et al. Histopathology of the ocular surface after eye rubbing. Cornea. 1997;16:327-332.
2. McMonnies CW, Boneham GC. Keratoconus, allergy, itch, eye-rubbing and hand dominance. Clin Exp Optom. 2003;86:376-384.
3. Korb DR, Leahy CD, Greiner JV. Prevalence and characteristics of eye rubbing for keratoconic and non-keratoconic subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(Suppl):884.
4. McMonnies CW. Abnormal rubbing and keratectasia. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:265-271.
5. McMonnies CW. Mechanisms of rubbing-related corneal trauma in keratoconus. Cornea. 2009;28:607-615.
6. Mansour AM, Haddad RS. Corneal topography after ocular rubbing. Cornea. 2002;21:756-758.
7. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Ren DH, et al. Effects of rigid and soft contact lens daily wear on corneal epithelium, tear lactate dehydrogenase, and bacterial binding to exfoliated epithelial cells. Ophthalmology. 2001;108: 1279-1288.
8. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2518-2523.
9. Tsubota K, Mashima Y, Murata H, et al. Corneal epithelium in keratoconus. Cornea. 1995;14:77-83.
10. Haque S, Jones L, Simpson T. Thickness mapping of the cornea and epithelium using OCT. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:E963-E976.
11. Jayakumar J, Swarbrick, HA. The effect of age on short-term orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:505-511.
12. Chan-Ling T, Pye DC. Pachometry: clinical and scientific applications. In: Ruben M, Guillon M, eds. Contact Lens Practice. London, United Kingdom: Chapman & Hall; 1994:407-435.
13. Wilson G, O'Leary DJ, Henson D. Micropachometry: a technique for measuring the thickness of the corneal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980;19:414-417.
14. Stevenson RWW, Eadie AS. Automated recording and analyses of pachometry data: a technical note. Cont Lens J. 1990;17:323-326.
15. Korah S, Thomas R, Muliyil J. Comparison of optical and ultrasound pachometry. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000;48:279-283.
16. Kiely PM, Carney LG, Smith G. Diurnal variations of corneal topography and thickness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982;59:976-982.
17. Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL. Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2001;20:480-483.
18. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, et al. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:571-581.
19. Sridharan R. Response and Regression of the Cornea With Short-Term OK Lens Kear [master's thesis]. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales; 2001.
20. Lu F, Simpson T, Sorbara L, et al. Malleability of the ocular surface in response to mechanical stress induced by orthokeratology contact lenses. Cornea. 2008;27:133-141.
21. Greenberg MH, Hill RM. The physiology of contact lens imprints. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973;50:699-702.
22. Buhren T, Collins MJ, Carney L. Corneal aberrations and reading. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:159-166.
23. Shaw AJ, Collins MJ, Davis BA, et al. Eyelid pressure: inferences from corneal topography changes. Cornea. 2009;28:181-188.
24. Collins MJ, Buehren T, Tasha T, et al. Factors influencing lid pressure on the cornea. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:168-173.
25. Kessing SV. A new division of the conjunctiva on the basis of X-ray examination. Acta Ophthalmol. 1967;45:680-683.
26. Miller D. Pressure of the lid on the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;78: 328-330.
27. Coleman DJ, Trokel S. Direct-recorded IOP variations in a human subject. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;82:637-640.
28. McMonnies CW, Boneham GC. Corneal curvature stability with increased intraocular pressure. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:124-129.
29. Schwartz NJ, Mackay RS, Sackman JL. A theoretical and experimental study of the mechanical behavior of the cornea with application to the measurement of IOP. Bull Math Biophys. 1966;28:585-643.
30. Mountford J. A model of forces acting in orthokerratrology. In: Mountford J, Dave T, Rushton D, eds. Orthokeratology, Principles and Practice. London, United Kingdom: Butterworth Heinemann; 2004:269-301.
31. Choo J, Caroline P, Harlin D. How does the cornea change under corneal reshaping contact lenses? Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:211-213.
32. Huang H, Kamm RD, Lee RT. Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probles, and physiology. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287: C1-C11.
33. Kamm RD, Mofrad MRK. Introduction with the biological basics for cell mechanics. In: Mofrad MRK, Kamm RD, eds. Cytoskeletal Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006:1-18.
34. Janmey P, Schmidt C. Experimental measurements of intra-cellular mechanics. In: Mofrad MRK, Kamm RD, eds. Cytoskeletal mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006:18-21.
35. Stamenovic D. Effects of cytoskeletal prestress on cell rheological behavior. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:255-262.
36. Wang N, Naruse K, Stamenovic D, et al. Mechanical behaviour in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7765-7770.
37. Bausch AR, Kroy K. A bottom-up approach to cell mechanics. Nat Phys. 2006;2:231-238.
38. Stamenovic D. Models of cytoskeletal mechanics based on tensegrity. In: Mofrad MRK, Kamm RD, eds. Cytoskeletal Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006:105-124.
39. Stamenovic D, Rosenblatt N, Montoya-Zavala M, et al. Rheological behaviour of living cells is timescale-dependent. Biophys J. 2007;93: L39-L41.
40. Humphrey JD, Delange SL. An Introduction to Biomechanics: Solids and Fluids, Analysis and Design. New York, NY: Springer; 2004: 7-11.
41. Vilela PM, Thompson D. Viscoelasticity: why plastic bags give way when you are halfway home. Eur J Phys. 1999;20:15-20.
42. Dawson DG, Watsky MA, Geroski DH, et al. Cornea and sclera. In: Tasman W. ed. Duane's Ophthalmology [CD-ROM]. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. Chapter 4.
43. Fredberg J, Fabry B. The cytoskeleton as a soft glassy material. In: Mofrad MRK, Kamm RD, eds. Cytoskeletal Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006:50-70.
44. Pollack GH. Cells, gels, and mechanics. In: Mofrad MRK, Kamm RD, eds. Cytoskeletal Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006:129-151.
45. Gonen T, Walz T. The structure of aquaporins. Q Rev Biophys. 2006;39: 361-396.
46. Guillak F, Haider MA, Setton LA, et al. Multiphasic models of cell mechanics. In: Mofrad MRK, Kamm RD, eds. Cytoskeletal Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006:84-102.
47. Lakes RS, Wineman A. On Poisson's ratio in linearly viscoelastic solids. J Elast. 2006;85:45-63.
48. Collyer AA. Demonstrations with viscoelastic liquids. Phys Educ. 1973;8: 111-116.
49. Bron AJ, Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ. Wolff's Anatomy of the eye and orbit. London, United Kingdom: Chapman & Hall Medical; 1997:233.
50. Stamenovic D, Mijailovich SM, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, et al. Cell prestress. II Contribution of microtubules. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;282: C617-C624.
51. Tan JCH, Kalapesi FB, Coroneo MT. Mechanosensitivity and the eye: cells coping with pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:383-388.
52. Oyster CW. The Human Eye: Structure and Function. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc; 1999:349.
53. MacKintosh FC. Polymer-based models of cytoskeletal networks. In: Mofrad MRK, Kamm RD, eds. Cytoskeletal Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 152-169.
54. Trepat X, Grabulosa M, Puig F, et al. Viscoelasticity of human alveolar epithelial cells subjected to stretch. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;287:L1025-L1034.
55. Bergmanson JPG. Histopathological analysis of the corneal epithelium after contact lens wear. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987;58:812-818.
56. Muller LJ, Pels E, Vrensen GFJ. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of curvature. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85: 437-443.
57. Muller LJ, Marfurt CF, Kruse F, et al. Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76:521-542.
58. Kallinikos P, Efon N. On the etiology of keratocyte loss during contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3011-3020.
59. Greiner JV, Peace DG, Baird RS, et al. Effects of eye rubbing on the conjunctiva as a model of ocular inflammation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985; 100:45-50.
60. Leahy CD, Greiner JV, Hebert E, et al. The effects of eye rubbing on the ocular surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:ARVOAbstract 208-31.
61. Iwata JL, Glonek T, Greiner JV, et al. Effects of eye rubbing on membrane phospholipids of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:ARVO Abstract 3224-211.
62. Shaw AJ, Collins MJ, Davis BA, et al. Corneal refractive changes due to short-term eyelid pressure in downward gaze. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1546-1553.
63. McMonnies CW. Management of chronic habits of abnormal rubbing. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2008;31:95-102.
64. McMonnies CW. Behaviour modification in the management of chronic habits of abnormal eye rubbing. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009;32:55-63.