Malleability of the ocular surface in response to mechanical stress induced by orthokeratology contact lenses

Cornea

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 133-141

  Lu, Fenghe ^a   Simpson, Trefford ^a   Sorbara, Luigina ^a   Fonn, Desmond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aberration; Corneal malleability; Corneal reshaping; Corneal topography; Corneal epithelial thickness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMA; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA CURVATURE; CORNEA EDEMA; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CORNEA SURGERY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; KERATOMETRY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MYOPIA; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CONTACT LENSES; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; MALE; MYOPIA; ORTHOKERATOLOGIC PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS FITTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 38549097581     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318158b4b5     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Mountford J. An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1997;24:128-143.
2. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:791-799.
3. Fan L, Jun J, Jia Q, et al. Clinical study of orthokeratology in young myopic adolescents. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1999;26:113-116.
4. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, et al. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:252-259.
5. Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, et al. Overnight orthokeratology: preliminary results of the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) study. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:598-605.
6. Caroline PJ, Choo JD. Modern corneal reshaping with contact lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16:405-413.
7. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards MH. Practice of orthokeratology by a group of contact lens practitioners in Hong Kong. Part 2: orthokeratology lenses. Clin Exp Optom. 2003;86:42-46.
8. Soni PS, Nguyen TT, Bonanno JA. Overnight orthokeratology: visual and corneal changes. Eye Contact Lens. 2003;29:137-145.
9. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2518-2523.
10. Tahhan N, Du Toit R, Papas E, et al. Comparison of reverse-geometry lens designs for overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:796-804.
11. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, et al. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after overnight wear of reverse-geometry rigid contact lenses for myopia reduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4742-4746.
12. Cheung SW, Cho P. Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology-a cross-sectional study. Curr Eye Res. 2004;28:121-127.
13. Soni P, Nguyen T, Bonanno J. Overnight Orthokeratology: refractive and corneal recovery after discontinuation of reverse geometry lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:254-262.
14. Barr JT, Rah MJ, Meyers W, et al. Recovery of refractive error after corneal refractive therapy. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:247-251.
15. Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher-order aberrations and best-corrected visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:490-497.
16. Jayakumar J, Swarbrick HA. The effect of age on short-term orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:505-511.
17. Sorbara L, Fonn D, Simpson T, et al. Reduction of myopia from corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:512-518.
18. Haque S, Fonn D, Simpson T, et al. Corneal and epithelial thickness changes after 4 weeks of overnight corneal refractive therapy lens wear, measured with optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:189-193.
19. Haque S, Fonn D, Sorbara L, et al. Corneal and epithelial thickness changes following one night of CRT gas permeable lens wear for hyperopia, measured with optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci. 2004; 81;12s:27.
20. Horner D, Armitage K, Wormsley K, et al. Corneal molding recovery after contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69:156-157.
21. Tahhan N, Sridharan R, Du Toit R, et al. Corneal topographical changes after fifteen minutes of reverse geometry lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78;12s:61.
22. Sridharan R, Swarbrick H. Corneal response to short-term orthokeratology lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:200-206.
23. Jackson JM, Bildstein T, Anderson J, et al. Short-term corneal changes with corneal regractive refractive therapy (CRT). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:E1547.
24. Kamei Y, Cassar K, Shen J, et al. Short-term corneal changes in closed eye condition with orthokeratology lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:E2060.
25. Lu F, Sorbara L, Simpson TL, et al. Corneal shape and optical performance after one night of hyperopic corneal refractive therapy lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;84:357-364.
26. Sorbara L, Lu F, Fonn D, et al. Refractive and keratometric effects of corneal refractive therapy for hyperopia after one night of lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:72.
27. Joslin C, Wu S, Mcmahon T, et al. Higher-order wavefront aberrations in corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:805-811.
28. Moezzi AM, Sin S, Simpson TL. Novel pachometry calibration. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:366-371.
29. Kiely PM, Carney LG, Smith G. Diurnal variations of corneal topography and thickness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982;59:976-982.
30. Cronje S, Harris WF. Short-term keratometric variation in the human eye. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:420-424.
31. Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL. Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2001;20:480-483.
32. Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, et al. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S652-S660.
33. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, et al. The measurement of corneal epithelial thickness in response to hypoxia using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:315-319.
34. Wong AC, Wong CC, Yuen NS, et al. Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry. Eye. 2002;16:715-721.
35. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, et al. Relation between optical coherence tomography and optical pachymetry measurements of corneal swelling induced by hypoxia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:93-98.
36. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after hydrogel and PMMA contact lens wear with eye closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1070-1074.
37. Wang J, Thomas J, Cox I, et al. Noncontact measurements of central corneal epithelial and flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1812-1816.
38. Tredici TJ. Symposium: clinical management of physiologic myopia. Role of orthokeratology: a perspective. Ophthalmology. 1979;86:698-705.
39. McMonnies CW. The biomechanics of keratoconus and rigid contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31:80-92.
40. Alharbi A, La Hood D, Swarbrick HA. Overnight orthokeratology lens wear can inhibit the central stromal edema response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2334-2340.
41. Allaire PE, Flack RD. Squeeze forces in contact lenses with a steep base curve radius. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980;57:219-227.
42. Mountford J. A model of forces acting in orthokeratology. In: Mountford J, Ruston D, Dave T, eds. Orthokeratology: Principle and Practice. Toronto: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004:269-302.
43. Carney LG, Mainstone JC, Carkeet A, et al. Rigid lens dynamics: lid effects. CLAO J. 1997;23:69-77.
44. Lieberman D, Grierson J. The lid influence on corneal shape. Cornea. 2000;19:336-342.
45. Ehrmann K, Francis I, Stapleton F. A novel instrument to quantify the tension of upper and lower eyelids. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2001;24:65-72.
46. Hoeltzel DA, Altman P, Buzard K, et al. Strip extensiometry for comparison of the mechanical response of bovine, rabbit, and human corneas. J Biomech Eng. 1992;114:202-215.
47. Zadnik K. A case of dimple veiling/staining. Contact Lens Forum. 1988;13:69.
48. Jones L, Jones D. Dimple-veil staining. Optician. 1995;210:32.
49. Pritchard N, Jones L, Dumbleton K, et al. Epithelial inclusions in association with mucin ball development in high-oxygen permeability hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:68-72.
50. Ladage PM, Petroll WM, Jester JV, et al. Spherical indentations of human and rabbit corneal epithelium following extended contact lens wear. CLAO J. 2002;28:177-180.
51. John Mountford. Unintended orthokeratology effect of silicone hydrogels on hypermetropic patients. Available at: http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/ featured_review/featured_review_aug_03.asp. Accessed June 26, 2007.
52. Choo JD, Caroline PJ, Holden BA, et al. Soft contact lenses can induce orthokeratology like topographical changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:E2062.
53. Evans SR, Ho A, Choo JD. Orthokeratologylike effects of everted soft contact lenses: a mechanical model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:E2059.
54. Lu F, Simpson T, Sorbara L, et al. The relationship between the treatment zone diameter and visual, optical and subjective performance in corneal refractive therapy lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:E1576.
55. Lu F, Simpson T, Sorbara L, et al. Corneal refractive therapy with different lens materials, Part 2: effect of oxygen transmissibility on corneal shape and optical characteristics. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;84:349-356.
56. Yang X, Gong XM, Dai ZY, et al. Topographical evaluation on decentration of orthokeratology lenses. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2003;39:335-338.