Examining the effects of digital feedback on student engagement and achievement

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 275-291

  Xu, Yaoying ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149259558     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.43.3.a     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2006). Making the grade: Online education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
4. Blood, E., & Neel, R. (2008). Using student response systems in lecture-based instruction: Does it change student engagement and learning? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 375-383.
5. Boekarts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Dick, W., Carey, L. M., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). New Research, 53(4), 445-459.
8. Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 81-94.
9. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
10. Foster, A. L. (2005, June 24). Mark essays electronically: A professor uses Tablet PC's in a composition course. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B18.
11. Gagné, R. M. (1985). Conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
12. Gray, R. (2002). Assessing students' written projects. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 91, 37-42.
13. Heinrichs, S. C., & Noel Dowds, B. (2008). Internet activities to enhance course content: Assessment of instructional effectiveness at institutional and intra-personal levels of analysis. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research, 55 (pp. 117-133). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
14. Helme, S., & Clarke, D. J. (2001). Cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. In D. Clarke (Ed.), Perspectives on practice and meaning in mathematics and science classrooms (pp. 131-154). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15. Järvelä, S., Veermans, M., & Leinonen, P. (2008). Investigating student engagement in computer-supported inquiry: A process-oriented analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 11(3), 299-322.
16. Jennings, S. E., & McCuller, M. Z. (2004). Meeting the challenges of grading online business communication assignments. Paper presented at the 69th Annual Convention: Association for Business Communication, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from http://www.businesscommunication. org/conventions/Proceedings/2004/PDFs/02ABC04.PDF
17. Klinger, T., & Connet, E. (1992). Designing distance learning courses for critical thinking. T.H.E. Journal, 20(3), 87-90.
18. Lopez-Herrejon, R., & Schulman, M. (2004). Using interactive technology in a short Java course: An experience report. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the 9th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, (pp. 203-207), Leeds, UK.
19. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21. Montgomery, H., Sharafi, P., & Heman, L. (2004). Engaging in activities involving information technology: Dimensions, modes, and flow. Human Factors, 46, 334-348.
22. Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 221-231.
23. Nachmias, R. (2002). Research framework for the study of a campus-wide web-based academic instruction project. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 213-229.
24. Nachmias, R., & Segev, L. (2003). Students' use of content in Web-supported academic courses. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 145-157.
25. Nagy-Shadman, E., & Desrochers, C. (2008). Student response technology: Empirically grounded or just a gimmick? International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 2023-2066
26. Peled, A., & Rashty, D. (1999). Logging for success: Advancing the use of WWW logs to improve computer mediated distance learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21, 413-431.
27. Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivated and self-regulated learning components of academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
28. Reed, J. L., Hagen, A. S., Wicker, F. W., & Schallert, D. L. (1996). Engagement as a temporal dynamic: Affective factors in studying for exams. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 101-109.
29. Reed, J. H., Schallert, D. L., & Deithloff, J. F. (2002). Investigating self-regulation and engagement processes. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 53-57.
30. Shank, G. D. (2002). Qualitative research: A personal skill approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
31. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
32. Smialek, T., & Boburka, R. R. (2006). The effects of co-operative listening exercises on the critical listening skills of college music-appreciation students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(1), 57-72.
33. Steinweg, S. B., Williams, S. C., & Warren, S. H. (2006). Reaching through the screen: Using a Tablet PC to provide feedback in online classes. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 25(2), 8-12.
34. Wallace, T., Grinnell, L., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2006). Maximizing learning from rehearsal activity in web-based distance learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(3), 319-327.
35. Zaiane, O. R., & Luo, J. (2001). Towards evaluating learners' behavior in a web-based distance learning environment. Available online at http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~zaiane/postscript/icalt.pdf