Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: Comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 673-681

  Husband, J E ^a   Padhani, A R ^a   MacVicar, A D ^a   Revell, P ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BALLOON; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECTUM; SEMINAL VESICLE; TUMOR VOLUME; VASCULARIZATION;

EID: 0031693144     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80294-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Cancer Society Cancer Facts and Figures 1997
2. Cancer in South East England Cancer Incidence, Prevalence and Survival in the District Health Authorities in South East England (1994) 1992 Thames Cancer Registry UK
3. Bezzi M Kressel HY Allen KS Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T Radiology 169 1988 339 346
4. Biondetti PR Lee JK Ling D Catalona WJ Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging Radiology 162 1987 325 329
5. Rifkin MD Zerhouni EA Gatsonis CA Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial New England Journal of Medicine 323 1990 621 626
6. Schnall MD Imai Y Tomaszewski J Pollack HM Lenkinski RE Kressel HY Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging Radiology 178 1991 797 802
7. Tempany CM Zhou X Zerhouni EA Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques Radiology 192 1994 47 54
8. Schiebler ML Yankaskas BC Tempany C MR imaging in adenocarcinoma of the prostate: interobserver variation and efficacy for determining stage C disease American Journal of Roentgenology 158 1992 559 562
9. Huch Böni RA Boner JA Debatin JF Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging and clinical methods Clinical Radiology 50 1995 593 600
10. Hricak H White S Vigneron D Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils Radiology 193 1994 703 709
11. Yu KK Hricak H Alagappan R Chernoff DM Becchetti P Zaloudek CJ Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis Radiology 202 1997 697 702
12. Outwater EK Petersen RO Siegelman ES Gomella LG Chernesky CE Mitchell DG Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images Radiology 193 1994 333 339
13. Jager GJ Ruijter ET van de Kaa CA Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology American Journal of Roentgenology 166 1996 845 852
14. Inter-rater Agreement Altman DG Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1st edn 1995 Chapman and Hall London 403 407
15. Listerud J Lenkinski RE Kressel HY Axel L The correction of nonuniform signal intensity profiles in magnetic resonance imaging Journal of Digital Imaging 2 1989 2 8
16. Schiebler ML Schanll MD Pollack HM Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate Radiology 189 1993 339 351
17. Hayes CE Dietz MJ King BF Ehman RL Pelvic imaging with phased array coils: Quantitative assessment of signal to noise improvement Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2 1992 321 326