Optimal timing of post-biopsy MR imaging of the prostate

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 70-73

  Ikonen, Saana ^a,b   Kivisaari, L ^a   Vehmas, T ^c   Tervahartiala, P ^a   Salo, J O ^b   Taari, K ^b   Rannikko, S ^b  

^a Department of Radiology ^*  (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Hemorrhage; MR imaging; Prostate, biopsy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BLEEDING; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENDOSCOPY; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035229440     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028418501127346260     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BATES T. S., GILLAT D. A., CAVANAGH P. M. et al.: A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation. Br. J. Urol. 79 (1997), 927.
2. BEZZI M., KRESSEL H. Y. & ALLEN K. S.: Prostatic carcinoma. Staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 169 (1988), 339.
3. ELLIS J. H., TEMPANY C. SARIN M. S. et al.: MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer. Pathologic and imaging featues that influence identification and diagnosis. AJR 162 (1994), 865.
4. GEVENOIS P. A., STALLENBERG B., SINTZOFF S. A. et al.: Granulomatous prostatitis. A pitfall in MR imaging of prostatic carcinoma. Eur. Radiol. 2 (1992), 365.
5. KAJI Y., KURHANEWICZ J., HRICAK H. et al.: Localizing prostate cancer in the presence of postbiopsy changes on MR images. Role of proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 206 (1998), 785.
6. MIROWITZ S. A.: Seminal vesicles. Biopsy-related hemorrhage simulating tumor invasion at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 185 (1992), 373.
7. MIROWITZ S. A., BROWN J. J., HEIKEN J. P. et al.: Evaluation of the prostate and prostatic carcinoma with gadolinium-enhanced endorectal coil MR imaging. Radiology 186 (1993), 153.
8. OUTWATER E. K., PETERSEN R. O., SIEGELMAN E. S. et al.: Prostate carcinoma. Assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 193 (1994), 333.
9. PLATT J. F., BREE R. L. & SCHWAB R. E.: The accuracy of CT in the staging of carcinoma of the prostate. AJR 149 (1987), 315.
10. QUINN S. F., FRANZINI D. A., DEMLOW D. A. et al.: MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique. Correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 190 (1994), 323.
11. RIFKIN M. D., ZERHOUNI E. A., GATSONIS C. A. et al.: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 323 (1990), 623.
12. SCHIEBLER M. L., SCHNALL M. D., POLLACK H. M. et al.: Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 189 (1993), 339.
13. SCHIEBLER M. L., TOMASZEWSKI J. E., BEZZI M. et al.: Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Correlation of high-resolution MR and histopathologic findings. Radiology 172 (1989), 131.
14. WHITE S., HRICAK H., FORSTNER R. et al.: Prostate cancer. Effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images. Radiology 195 (1995), 385.