Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: Foundations for assessing and developing biochemistry students' visual literacy

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 347-354

  Schönborn, Konrad J ^a   Anderson, Trevor R ^b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Assessment; Developing interpretation and visualization skills; External representations; Meaningful learning; Visual literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049477175     PISSN: 14708175     EISSN: 15393429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20436     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. T. R. Anderson, K. J. Schönborn (2008) Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: Conceptual understanding, Part 1: The multifaceted nature of expert knowledge. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 36, 309-315.
2. K. J. Schönborn, T. R. Anderson (2008) Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: Conceptual understanding, Part 2: Assessing and developing student knowledge. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 36, 372-379.
3. K. J. Schönborn, T. R. Anderson (2006) The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists. Biochem. Mol. Bio. Educ. 34, 94-102.
4. K. J. Schönborn, T. R. Anderson (2009) A model of factors determining students' ability to interpret external representations in biochemistry. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 31, 193-232.
5. A. Bamford (2003) The visual literacy white paper, Adobe Systems, Stockley Park, UK.
6. J. G. Voet, D. H. Voet (2008) Education corner. RCSB Protein Data Bank Newsletter 38, 5-6.
7. S. I. O'Donoghue, D. S. Goodsell, A. S. Frangakis, F. Jossinet, R. A. Laskowski, M. Nilges, H. R. Saibil, A. Schafferhans, R. C. Wade, E. Westhof, A. J. Olson (2010) Visualization of macromolecular structures. Nat. Methods 7, S42-S55.
8. S. Bottomley, D. Chandler, E. Morgan, E. Helmerhorst (2006) jAMVLE, A new integrated molecular visualization learning environment. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34, 343-349.
9. A. Herráez (2006) Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34, 255-261.
10. E. Hodis, J. L. Sussman (2008) An encyclopedic effort to make 3D structures easier to understand. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 100-101.
11. Y. Rotbain, G. Marbach-Ad, R. Stavy (2006) Effect of bead and illustrations models on high-school students' achievement in molecular genetics. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 43, 500-529.
12. J. R. Roberts, E. Hagedorn, P. Dillenburg, M. Patrick, T. Herman (2005) Physical models enhance molecular three-dimensional literacy in an introductory biochemistry course. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 33, 105-110.
13. K. J. Schönborn, T. R. Anderson, D. J. Grayson (2002) Student difficulties with the interpretation of a textbook diagram of immunoglobulin G (IgG). Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 30, 93-97.
14. M. D. Patrick, G. Carter, E. N. Wiebe (2005) Visual representations of DNA replication: Middle grades students' perceptions and interpretations. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 14, 353-365.
15. G. Marbach-Ad, Y. Rotbain, R. Stavy (2008) Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students' achievement in molecular genetics. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 45, 273-292.
16. C.-J. A. Rundgren, L. A. E. Tibell (2010) Critical features of visualizations of transport through the cell membrane - an empirical study of upper secondary and tertiary students' meaning-making of a still image and an animation. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 8, 223-246.
17. P. Bivall Persson, M. D. Cooper, L. A. E. Tibell, S. Ainsworth, A. Ynnerman, B.-H. Jonsson, in:D. Bowman, S. Julier, Chairs (2007) Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, IEEE, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, pp. 171-178.
18. M. Avgerinou, J. Ericson (1997) A review of the concept of visual literacy. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 28, 280-291.
19. R. Lowe, W. Schnotz (2007) Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
20. M. Cook, G. Carter, E. N. Wiebe (2008) The interpretation of cellular transport graphics by students with low and high prior knowledge. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 30, 239-261.
21. H.-R. Dahmani, P. Schneeberger, I. M. Kramer (2009) Analysis of students' aptitude to provide meaning to images that represent cellular components at the molecular level. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 8, 226-238.
22. D. S. Goodsell (2006) Seeing the nanoscale. Nanotoday 1, 44-49.
23. B. White (2006) A simple and effective protein folding activity suitable for large lectures. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 5, 264-269.
24. T. Herman, J. Morris, S. Colton, A. Batiza, M. Patrick, M. Franzen, D. S. Goodsell (2006) Tactile teaching: Exploring protein structure/function using physical models. Biochem. Mol. Bio. Educ. 34, 247-254.
25. D. C. Richardson, J. S. Richardson (2002) Teaching molecular 3-D literacy. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 30, 21-26.
26. M. A. Harris, R. F. Peck, S. Colton, J. Morris, E. C. Neto, J. Kallio (2009) A combination of hand-held models and computer imaging programs helps students answer oral questions about molecular structure and function: A controlled investigation of student learning. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 8, 29-43.
27. D. Booth, R. C. Bateman, R. Sirochman, D. C. Richardson, J. S. Richardson, S. W. Weiner, M. Farwell, C. Putnam-Evans (2005) Assessment of molecular construction in undergraduate biochemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 82, 1854-1858.
28. T. Aegerter-Wilmsen, F. Janssen, R. Hartog, T. Bisseling (2005) Digital learning material for model building in molecular biology. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 14, 123-134.
29. L. M. Beltramini, A. P. U. Araújo, T. H. G. de Oliveira, L. D. dos Santos Abel, A. R. da Silva, N. F. dos Santos (2006) A new three-dimensional educational model kit for building DNA and RNA molecules: Development and evaluation. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34, 187-193.
30. K. J. Schönborn, S. Bögeholz (2009) Knowledge transfer in biology and translation across external representations: Experts' views and challenges for learning. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 7, 931-955.
31. D. J. Kelley, R. J. Davidson, D. L. Nelson (2008) An imaging roadmap for biology education: From nanoparticles to whole organisms. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 7, 202-209.
32. R. G. Duncan, B. J. Reiser (2007) Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understandings of molecular genetics. J. Res. Sci Teach. 44, 938-959.
33. G. Nicoll (2003) A qualitative investigation of undergraduate chemistry students' macroscopic interpretations of the submicroscopic structure of molecules. J. Chem. Educ. 80, 205-213.
34. R. Tasker, R. Dalton (2006) Research into practice: Visualisation of the molecular world using animations. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 7, 141-159.
35. A. H. Johnstone (2010) You can't get there from here. J. Chem. Educ. 87, 22-29.
36. P. M. Ross, C. E. Taylor, C. Hughes, M. Kofod, N. Whitaker, L. Lutze-Mann, V. Tzioumis, in J. H. F Meyer, R. Land, C. Baillie, Eds. (2009) Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
37. S. Y. Stevens, L. M. Sutherland, J. S. Krajcik (2009) The Big Ideas of Nanoscale Science and Engineering: A Guidebook for Secondary Teachers, NSTA Press, Arlington, VA.
38. M. G. Jones, T. Andre, R. Superfine, R. Taylor, R. (2003) Learning at the nanoscale: The impact of students' use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale, and microscopy. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40, 303-322.
39. M. G. Jones, A. Taylor, J. Minogue, B. Broadwell, E. Wiebe, G. Carter (2006) Understanding scale: Powers of ten. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 16, 191-202.
40. M. G. Jones, T. Tretter, A. Taylor, T. Oppewal (2008) Experienced and novice teachers' concepts of spatial scale. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 30, 409-429.
41. H.-K. Wu, P. Shah (2004) Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Sci. Educ. 88, 465-492.
42. R. C. Garratt, C. A. Orengo (2008) The Protein Chart, Wiley VCH Publishers, Weinheim.
43. R. Kozma, J. Russell, in J. Gilbert, Ed. (2005), Visualization in Science Education, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 121-146.
44. H. Tuckey, M. Selvaratnam (1993) Studies involving three-dimensional visualisation skills in chemistry: A review. Studies Sci. Educ. 21, 99-121.
45. Foldit, solve puzzles for science, Available at: (accessed July 14, 2009).
46. S. Ainsworth (1999) The functions of multiple representations. Comput. Educ. 33, 131-152.
47. T. R. Anderson (2007) Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: The power of assessment. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 35, 471-477.