The problem in technology education (A definite article)

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 10-20

  Flowers, Jim ^a  

^a Department of Technology at Ball State University ^*  (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049439078     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v21i2.a.2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boben, D. K. (1985). Guidelines for equity issues in technology education. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association
2. Boser, R. A. (1993). The development of problem solving capabilities in preservice technology teacher education. Journal of Technology Education, 4(2), 11-27.
3. Gray, M., & Daugherty, M. (2004). Factors that influence students to enroll in technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 15(2), 5-19
4. Chesterman, A. (1991). On definiteness - A study with special reference to English and Finnish. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
5. Christopherson, P. (1939). The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.
6. Daugherty, J., & Mentzer, N. (2008). Analogical reasoning in the engineering design process and technology education applications. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 7-21.
7. Epstein, R. (2002). The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(4), 333-378.
8. Fendley, P. (2009). Five problems in physics without the definite article. Science News, 176(2), 32.
9. Hanson, R. E., (1993). A technological teacher education program planning model. Journal of Technology Education, 5(1), 21-28.
10. Hutchinson, J. & Karsnitz, J. (1994). Design and problem solving in technology. Peoria, IL: Delmar. International Technology Education Association. (n.d.). This we believe. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved October 18, 2009 from http://www.iteaconnect.org/AboutITEA/ThisWeBelieve.pdf
11. International Technology Education Association. (1996). Technology for all Americans - A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
12. International Technology Education Association. (2006). Technological systems - A standards-based middle school model course guide. Reston, VA: Author.
13. International Technology Education Association. (2007). Standards for technological literacy. Reston, VA: Author.
14. Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity - A framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 35-52.
15. MacDonald, D., & Gustafson, B. (2004). The role of design drawing among children engaged in a parachute building activity. Journal of Technology Education, 16(1), 55-71.
16. Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Science and Technology/Engineering curriculum framework. Malden, MA: Author.
17. McCarthy, R. (2009). Beyond smash and crash: Gender-friendly tech ed. The Technology Teacher, 69(2), 16-21.
18. Neufeldt, V. (Ed.). (1997). Webster's new world college dictionary, 3rd Ed. New York, NY: Macmillan. Olowa,
19. O. W. (2009). Effects of the problem solving and subject matter approaches on the problem solving ability of secondary school agricultural education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 46 (1), 33-47.
20. Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Scribners.
21. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
22. Ritz, J. M. (2009). A new generation of goals for technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(2), 50-64.
23. Rogers, G. (2006). The effectiveness of project lead the way curricula in developing pre-engineering competencies as perceived by Indiana teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 18(1), 66-78.
24. Snyder, J. F., & Hales, J. A. (1981). Jackson's Mill industrial arts curriculum theory. Fairmont, WV: American Industrial Arts Association