The role of design drawing among children engaged in a parachute building activity

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-71

  MacDonald, Dougal ^a   Gustafson, Brenda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18544380675     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v16i1.a.4     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1967). Science: A Process Approach. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Alberta Education (1996). Science (Elementary) Program of Studies. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Author.
3. Anning, A. (1997). Drawing out ideas: Graphicacy and young children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 219-239.
4. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5. Bottrill, P. (1995). Designing and Learning in the Elementary School. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
6. Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Cross, N., & Cross, A. (1998). Expertise in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 10, 141-149.
8. Crowe, N., & Laseau, P. (1984). Visual Notes for Architects and Designers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
9. Custer, R. (1995). Examining the dimensions of technology, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5(5), 219-244.
10. Davies, D. (1996). Professional design and primary children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 6, 1-15.
11. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Do, E., & Gross, M. (2001). Thinking with diagrams in architectural design. Artificial Intelligence Review 15, 135-149.
13. Eggleston, J. (1996). Teaching Design and Technology. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
14. Ferguson, E. (1999). Engineering and the Mind's Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Fleer, M. (2000). Interactive technology: Can children construct their own technological design briefs? Research in Science Education, 30(2), 241-253.
16. Fraser, I., & Henmi, R. (1994). Envisioning Architecture. New York: Van Nostrand.
17. Garner, S. (1992). The undervalued role of drawing in design. In D. Thistlewood (ed.) Drawing Research and Development, Burnt Mill, England: Longman, 98-109.
18. Garner, S. (1994). Drawing and design exploration and manipulation through two-dimensional modeling. In J. Smith (ed.), National Conference in Design Technology Research and Curriculum Development (DATER 89), Loughborough, England: Loughborough University, pp. 43-50.
19. Hope, G. (2000). Beyond their capability? Drawing, designing and the young child. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(2), 105-114.
20. International Technology Education Association (2000). Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. Reston, VA: Author.
21. Janesick, V.J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 379-400.
22. Johnsey, R. (1997). Improving children's performance in the procedures of design and technology. Journal of Design and Technology, 2(3), 201-207.
23. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., & Green, R. (1996). Understanding Practice in Design and Technology. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
24. Laseau, P. (1980). Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
25. Layton, D. (1993). Technology's Challenge to Science Education. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
26. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Lindsey, B. (2001). Digital Gehry. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.
28. MacDonald, D. (1995). What counts as science teaching? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Calgary: Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
29. McCormick, R., & Davidson, M. (1996). Problem solving and the tyranny of product outcomes. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1(3), 230-41.
30. Medway, P. (1994). The language component of technological capability: Lessons from architecture. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 85-107.
31. Roberts, D. A., & Russell, T. (1975). An alternative approach to science education research: Drawing from philosophical analysis to examine practice. Curriculum Theory Network, 5(2), 107-125.
32. Robbins, E. (1994). Why Architects Draw. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
33. Rogers, G. (1998, July). The designing stage of design, make, and appraise: A case study involving young children designing. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Darwin, Australia.
34. Schenk, P. (1991). The role of drawing in the graphic design process. Design Studies, 12 (3), 168-181.
35. Smith, J. (2001). The current and future role of modeling in design and technology. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 6(1), 5-15.
36. Smith, J., Brochocka, K., & Baynes, K. (2001). A pilot study into the value of 3D sketch modeling at Key Stage 3. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 6(2), 125-138.
37. Steele, J. (1994). Architecture in Process. London: Academy Press.
38. Walshe, R. (Ed.) (1981). Donald Graves in Australia-'Children want to write...' Rozelle, New South Wales: Primary English Teaching Association.
39. Welch, M. (1998). Students' use of three-dimensional modeling while designing and making a solution to a technological problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 241-260.
40. Welch, M., Barlex, D., & Lim, H. S. (2000). Sketching: Friend or foe to the novice designer? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 125-148.