A new generation of goals for technology education

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 50-64

  Ritz, John M ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349737591     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v20i2.a.4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Vocational Association (AVA). (1968). A guide to improving instruction in industrial arts (Rev. ed.). Washington, D.C. Author.
2. Buffer, J. J., Hauenstein, A. D., & Ray, W. E. (1968). IACP: General information. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
3. Face, W. L. & Flug, E. R. F. (1965). The establishment of American industry as a transitional subject between general and vocational education. Menomonie, WI: Stout State University.
4. Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. Washington DC: National Education Association.
5. DeVore, P. W. (1972). Education in a technological society: Access to tools. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University.
6. Dugger, W. E., Miller, C. D., Bame, E. A., Pinder, C. A. Giles, M.B., Young, L. H., & Dixon, J. D. (1980). Report of the survey data. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
7. International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (1985). Technology education: A perspective on implementation. Reston, VA: Author.
8. International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (1990). A conceptual framework for technology education. Reston, VA: Author.
9. International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (1996). Technology for all Americans, a rational and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
10. International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
11. Lewis, D. D., Green, D. R., Mitzel, H. C., Baum, K., & Patz, R. J. (1996). Standard setting: A bookmark approach. In D. R. Green (Chair), IRT based standard setting procedures utilizing behavior anchoring. Symposium conducted at the Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Phoenix, AZ.
12. Maley, D. (1973). The Maryland plan. Beverly Hills, CA: Bruce.
13. Mitzel, H. C., Lewis, D. M., Patz, R. J., & Green, D. R. (2001). The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives, (pp. 249-281). Majwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and National Research Council (NRC). (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Edited by G. Pearson & T. Young. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
15. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessments. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
16. Sanders, M. (2001). New paradigm or old wine? The status of technology education practice in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 12(2), 35-55.
17. Schmitt, M. L., & Pelley, A. L. (1966). Industrial arts education: A survey of programs, teachers, students, and curriculum. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. OE 3338, Circular No. 791. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Snyder, J. F., & Hales, J. A. (1981). Jackson's Mill industrial arts curriculum theory. Charleston: West Virginia Department of Education.
19. The National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). Nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
20. Tyler, R.W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Zais, R.S. (1976). Curriculum: principles and foundations. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell Company, Inc.
22. U. S. Department of Education. (1991). America 2000: An education strategy sourcebook. Washington DC: Author.
23. U.S. Office of Education (USOE). (1962). Improving industrial arts teaching, OE-33022. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. U.S. Office of Education (USOE). (1961). Industrial arts, OE-33019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.