Impact of abutment rotation and angulation on marginal fit: Theoretical considerations

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 752-758

  Semper, Wiebke ^a   Kraft, Silvan ^a   Mehrhof, Jürgen ^b   Nelson, Katja ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Zahntechnik Mehrhof GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abutment rotation; Marginal gap; Prosthesis misfit; Three dimensional simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; THEORETICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 78049428867     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996; 9: 149-160.
2. de Barros Carrilho GP, Dias RP, Elias CN. Comparison of external and internal hex implants’ rotational freedom: A pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 165-166.
3. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina Procera abutments with hexagonal connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 575-580.
4. Garine WN, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Wodenscheck J, Murphy WC. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 928-938.
5. Semper W, Heberer S, Mehrhof J, Schink T, Nelson K. Effects of repeated manual disassembly and reassembly on the positional stability of various implant-abutment complexes: An experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 86-94.
6. Semper W, Kraft S, Krüger T, Nelson K. Theoretical considerations: Implant positional index design. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 725-730.
7. Semper W, Kraft S, Krüger T, Nelson K. Theoretical optimum of implant positional index design. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 731-735.
8. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 405-458.
9. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: Parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 466-473.
10. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 30-37.
11. Weigl P, Hahn L, Lauer HC. Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 320-336.
12. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: The Procera all-ceram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 394-404.
13. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 441-447.
14. Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushima S, Vult von Steyern P. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 753-758.
15. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metalceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1311-1315.
16. Koke U, Wolf A, Lenz P, Gilde H. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 477-482.
17. Ganz SD, Desai N, Weiner S. Marginal integrity of direct and indirect castings for implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 593-599.
18. Att W, Hoischen T, Gerds T, Strub JR. Marginal adaptation of allceramic crowns on implant abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008; 10: 218-225.
19. Torsello F, di Torresanto VM, Ercoli C, Cordaro L. Evaluation of the marginal precision of one-piece complete arch titanium frameworks fabricated using five different methods for implant-supported restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 772-779.
20. de Torres EM, Rodrigues RC, de Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks. J Dent 2007; 35: 800-805.
21. Sartori IA, Ribeiro RF, Francischone CE, de Mattos Mda G. In vitro comparative analysis of the fit of gold alloy or commercially pure titanium implant-supported prostheses before and after electroerosion. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 132-138.
22. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131: 107-111.
23. Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Precision of fit: Zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 343-349.
24. Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 819-823.
25. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P, Axmann-Krcmar D, Chanavaz M. Evolution of the concept of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data. Implant Dent 2002; 11: 41-51.
26. Weigl P, Lauer HC. Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 337-347.
27. Al Wazzan KA, Al-Nazzawi AA. Marginal and internal adaptation of commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminumvanadium alloy cast restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 19-26.
28. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116: 272-279.
29. Jemt T. Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 557-564.
30. Cehreli MC, Akça K. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: An in vitro study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 379-385.
31. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 620-625.
32. Pietrabissa R, Gionso L, Quaglini V, Di Martino E, Simion M. An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 448-457.
33. Guindy JS, Schiel H, Schmidli F, Wirz J. Corrosion at the marginal gap of implant-supported suprastructures and implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 826-831.
34. Lekholm U, Adell R, Brånemark P-I. Complications. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985: 233-240.
35. Besimo CE, Guindy JS, Lewetag D, Meyer J. Prevention of bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained crowns on implants in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 654-660.
36. Ricketts RM. Occlusion-The medium of dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 21: 39-59.
37. Tosches NA, Brägger U, Lang NP. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) dental implant system: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 79-86.
38. Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 3-8.