Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computed tomography

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 304-309

  Katheria, Binita C ^a   Kau, Chung H ^b   Tate, Robert ^d   Chen, Jung Wei ^c   English, Jeryl ^a   Bouquot, Jerry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Department of Orthodontics ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomograpy; Impacted tooth; Supernumeray tooth

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTISTRY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLA; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH MALFORMATION;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CUSPID; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FACULTY, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MAXILLA; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; ROOT RESORPTION; TOOTH, IMPACTED; TOOTH, SUPERNUMERARY;

EID: 78049425471     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Threedimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005;32(4):282-93.
2. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007;33(9):1121-32.
3. Danforth RA, Peck J, Hall P. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31(11):847-52.
4. Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, Michiels K, van Steenberghe D. Volumetric analysis of extraction sockets using cone beam computed tomography: a pilot study on ex vivo jaw bone. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34(11):985-90.
5. Korbmacher H, Kahl-Nieke B, Schollchen M, Heiland M. Value of two cone-beam computed tomography systems from an orthodontic point of view. J Orofac Orthop 2007;68(4):278-89. (Pubitemid 47103876)
6. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8(9):1558-64. (Pubitemid 128662693)
7. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited conebeam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(2):228-31. (Pubitemid 38561060)
8. Maverna R, Gracco A. Different diagnostic tools for the localization of impacted maxillary canines: clinical considerations. Prog Orthod 2007;8(1):28-44.
9. Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, Wu YT, Ma XC. Threedimensional evaluations of supernumerary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for 487 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(3):403-11.
10. Primosch RE. Anterior supernumerary teeth-assessment and surgical intervention in children. Pediatr Dent 1981; 3(2):204-15.
11. Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbance. Eur J Orthod 1986;8(3):133-40.
12. Jacobs SG. Localization of the unerupted maxillary canine: how to and when to. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115(3):314-22.
13. Mason C, Papadakou P, Roberts GJ. The radiographic localization of impacted maxillary canines: a comparison of methods. Eur J Orthod 2001;23(1):25-34. (Pubitemid 33671989)
14. Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic examination of ectopically erupting maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91(6):483-92.
15. Ericson S, Kurol PJ. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod 2000;70(6):415-23.
16. Schmuth GP, Freisfeld M, Koster O, Schuller H. The application of computerized tomography (CT) in cases of impacted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod 1992;14 (4):296-301.
17. Freisfeld M, Dahl IA, Jager A, Drescher D, Schuller H. X-ray diagnosis of impacted upper canines in panoramic radiographs and computed tomographs. J Orofac Orthop 1999;60(3):177-84.
18. Sawamura T, Minowa K, Nakamura M. Impacted teeth in the maxilla: usefulness of 3D Dental-CT for preoperative evaluation. Eur J Radiol 2003;47(3):221-6. (Pubitemid 36970083)
19. Haney E. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(5):711-12.
20. Yamamoto K, Hayakawa Y, Kousuge Y, Wakoh M, Sekiguchi H, Yakushiji M, et al. Diagnostic value of tunedaperture computed tomography versus conventional dentoalveolar imaging in assessment of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95(1):109-18. (Pubitemid 36886731)
21. Suri S, Utreja A, Khandelwal N, Mago SK. Craniofacial computerized tomography analysis of the midface of patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134(3): 418-29.
22. Danforth RA, Dus I, Mah J. 3-D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31(11):817-23.
23. Bulletin ACoR. 2001;57(2):20-23.
24. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, Sanderink G. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34(3):145-9. (Pubitemid 40965973)
25. Cohnen M, Kemper J, Mobes O, Pawelzik J, Modder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(3):634-7. (Pubitemid 36940109)
26. Hardin C. State regulatory radiation activities. Pediatr Dent 1982(Special Issue):386-99.