Concurrent memory load can make RSVP search more efficient;La carga de memoria puede hacer más eficiente la búsqueda en una tarea de PRSV

Psicologica

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-30

  de Liaño, Beatriz Gil Gómez ^a   Botella, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049424912     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akyürek, E. G., & Hommel, B. (2005). Short-term memory and the Attentional Blink: Capacity versus content. Memory & Cognition, 33, 654-663.
2. Akyürek, E. G., & Hommel, B. (2006). Memory operations in rapid serial visual presentation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 520-536.
3. Akyürek, E. G., & Hommel, B. (2007). Stimulus and response priming in rapid serial visual presentation: Evidence for a dissociation. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1152-1161.
4. Akyürek, E. G., Hommel, B., & Jolicœur, P. (2007). Direct evidence for a role of working memory in the attentional blink. Memory & Cognition, 35, 621-627
5. Botella, J., Barriopedro, M. I., & Suero, M. (2001). A Model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27 (6), 1452-1467.
6. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.
7. Colzato, L. S., Spapè, M., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the Attentional Blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1051-1057.
8. Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 328-334.
9. Correa, A., Sanabria, D., Spence, C, Tudela, P. & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Selective temporal attention enhances the temporal resolution of visual perception: Evidence from a temporal order judgment task. Brain Research, 1070, 202-205.
10. Coull, J. T. & Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI. The Journal ofNeuroscience, 18(18), 7426-7435.
11. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. De Fockert, J.W., Rees, G., Frith, CD., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806.
13. de Liaño BG, Botella, J. (2010). Effects of memory load in Visual Search. Psicothema, 22(4), 725-731.
14. de Liaño, BG., Umiltà, C, Stablum, F., Tebaldi, F., y Cantagallo, A. (in press) Attentional Distractor Interference May Be Diminished by Concurrent Working Memory Load in Normal Participants and Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. Brain & Cognition. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.08.009
15. Hester, R., & Garavan, H. (2005). Working memory and executive function: The influence of content and load on the control of attention. Memory & Cognition, 33 (2), 221-233.
16. Hitch, G. J., Woodin, M. E., & Baker, S. (1989). Visual and phonological components of working memory in children. Memory & Cognition, 17, 175-185.
17. Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. S., & Chun, M. M. (2005). Concurrent Memory Load Can Reduce Distraction. PNAS, 102 (45), 16524-16529.
18. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
19. Lavie, N. & De Fockert, J. (2006). Frontal control of attentional capture in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 863-876.
20. Lavie, N, Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., y Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133 (3), 339-354.
21. Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticicity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 32-63.
22. Olivers, C.N.L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). The Beneficial Effects of Additional Task Load, Positive Affect, and Instruction on the Attentional Blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 364-379.
23. O'Shea, J., Muggleton, N. G., Cowey, A. & Walsh, V. (2006). On the roles of the human frontal eye fields and parietal cortex in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 934-957.
24. Rissman, J., Gazzaley, A., & D'Esposito M. (2009). The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1637-1646.
25. Rolke, B., & Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 522-526.
26. SanMiguel, I., Corral, M. J. & Escera, C. (2008). When loading working memory educes distraction: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20, 1131-1145.
27. Silverberg, N. & Buchanan, L. (2005). Verbal mediation and memory for novel figural designs: a dual interference study. Brain and Cognition, 57, 198-209.
28. Smilek, D., Enns, J. T., Eastwood, J. D. & Merikle, P. M. (2006). Relax! Cognitive strategy influences visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 543-564.
29. Taatgen, N. A., Juvina, I., Schipper, M., Borst, J. P. & Martens, S. (2009). Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 1-29.
30. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modelling of elementary psychological processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Walker, P., Hitch, G. J., & Duroe, A. (1993). The effect of visual similarity on short-term memory for spatial location: Implications for the capacity of visual short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 83, 203-224.
32. Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224.