A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1452-1467

  Botella, Juan ^a   Barriopedro, María I ^b   Suero, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; TIME; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 85047684543     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1452     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano [Dictionary of frequencies of Castilian linguistic units]. Oviedo, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
2. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., & Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
3. Botella, J. (1992). Target-specified and target-categorized conditions in RSVP tasks as reflected by detection time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 197-200.
4. Botella, J. (1998). Conjunciones ilusorias en el dominio del tiempo [Illusory conjunctions in the time domain]. In J. Botella & V. Ponsoda (Eds.), La atención: Un enfoque pluridisciplinar (pp. 145-155). Valencia, Spain: Promolibro.
5. Botella, J., & Barriopedro, M. I. (1998). Processing time and intrusion patterns in RSVP tasks. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 406.
6. Botella, J., Barriopedro, M. I., & Ruiz, M. A. (1999). Repetition blindness and intrusion errors. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 260.
7. Botella, J., & Eriksen, C. W. (1991). Pattern changes in rapid serial visual presentation tasks without strategic shifts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 105-108.
8. Botella, J., & Eriksen, C. W. (1992). Filtering versus parallel processing in RSVP tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 334-343.
9. Botella, J., García, M. L., & Barriopedro, M. I. (1992). Intrusion models in rapid serial visual presentation tasks with two response dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 547-552.
10. Botella, J., & Villar, M. V. (1986). Identificación de palabras en presentación rápida de series visuales: Una réplica del "efecto Lawrence" [Identification of words in rapid serial visual presentations: A replication of the "Lawrence effect"]. Conocimiento y Accio"n, 1, 7-21.
11. Botella, J., & Villar, M. V. (1989). Modelos de procesamiento en tareas de presentación rápida de series visuales [Processing models in rapid serial visual presentation tasks]. Psicológica, 10, 179-203.
12. Boucart, M., Moroni, C., Fuentes, L. J., & Belin, C. (1998). Variations of attentional blink as a function of task and semantic similarity. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 685.
13. Broadbent, D. (1977a). Colour, localisation and perceptual selection. In Psychologie Expérimentale et Comparée (pp. 95-98). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
14. Broadbent, D. E. (1977b). The hidden preattentive process. American Psychologist, 32, 109-118.
15. Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
16. Chun, M. M. (1997a). Temporal binding errors are redistributed by attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1191-1199.
17. Chun, M. M. (1997b). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 738-755.
18. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.
19. Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 650-663.
20. Donk, M. (1999). Illusory conjunctions are an illusion: The effects of target-nontarget similarity on conjunction and feature errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1207-1233.
21. Fournier, L. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Bowd, C. (1998). Multiple-feature discrimination faster than single-feature discrimination within the same object? Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1384-1405.
22. Gathercole, S. E., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). Combining attributes in specified and categorized target search: Further evidence for strategic differences. Memory & Cognition, 12, 329-337.
23. Intraub, H. (1985). Visual dissociation: An illusory conjunction of pictures and forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 431-442.
24. Ivry, R. B., & Prinzmetal, W. (1991). Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 105-116.
25. Juola, J. F., Duvuru, P., & Peterson, M. S. (2000). Priming effects in attentional gating. Memory & Cognition, 28, 224-235.
26. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
28. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
29. Kanwisher, N. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
30. Keele, S., Cohen, A., Ivry, R., Liotti, M., & Yee, P. (1988). Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 444-452.
31. Keele, S. W., & Neill, W. T. (1978). Mechanisms of attention. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 9, pp. 3-47). New York: Academic Press.
32. Kikuchi, T. (1996). Detection of kanji words in a rapid serial visual presentation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 332-341.
33. Lawrence, D. H. (1971). Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 85-89.
34. Luce, D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
35. Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., & Shapiro, K. L. (1996, October 17). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616-618.
36. Maki, W. S., Frigen, K., & Paulson, K. (1997). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1014-1034.
37. McLean, J. P., Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1983). Combining attributes in rapid serial visual presentation tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 35(A), 171-186.
38. Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Potter, M. C. (1993). Very short-term conceptual memory. Memory & Cognition, 21, 156-161.
40. Prinzmetal, W., Henderson, D., & Ivry, R. (1995). Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: Assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1362-1375.
41. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 653-662.
42. Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. (1986). Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychological Review, 93, 180-206.
43. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 20, 206-217.
44. Shapiro, K., Driver, J., Ward, R., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Priming from attentional blink: A failure to extract tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science, 8, 95-100.
45. Shapiro, K. L., & Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory and language (pp. 151-188). New York: Academic Press.
46. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
47. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
48. Tsal, Y. (1989). Do illusory conjunctions support the feature integration theory? A critical review of theory and findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 394-400.
49. Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987, November 6). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778-780.