Stimulus and response priming in rapid serial visual presentation: Evidence for a dissociation

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1152-1161

  Akyürek, Elkan G ^a,b,c   Hommel, Bernhard ^a,c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148930238     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193952     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BERTELSON, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90-102.
2. BERTELSON, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217-218.
3. BROADBENT, D. E., & BROADBENT, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
4. CHUN, M. M., & POTTER, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109-127.
5. COLZATO, L. S., WARRENS, M. J., & HOMMEL, B. (2006). Pruning and binding in and across perception and action: A correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1785-1804.
6. EIMER, M., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
7. GROSS, J., SCHMITZ, F., SCHNITZLER, I., KESSLER, K., SHAPIRO, K., HOMMEL, B., & SCHNITZLER, A. (2004). Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 13050-13055.
8. HOMMEL, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
9. HOMMEL, B. (2004). Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect Psychological Research, 68, 74-90.
10. HOMMEL, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1067-1082.
11. HOMMEL, B., & EGLAU, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273.
12. 1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014-1032.
13. JOLICŒUR, P., & DELL'ACQUA, R. (1998). The demonstration of shortterm consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
14. JOLICŒUR, P., TOMBU, M., ORIET, C., & STEVANOVSKI, B. (2002). From perception to action: Making the connection. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX(pp. 558-586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. JUOLA, J. F., BOTELLA, J., & PALACIOS, A. (2004). Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1303-1317.
16. KANWISHER, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
17. LEUTHOLD, H., & KOPP, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
18. LOACH, D., & MARÍ-BEFFA, P. (2003). Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism? Visual Cognition, 10, 513-526.
19. LOGAN, G. D., & SCHULKIND, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
20. LUCK, S. J., VOGEL, E. K., & SHAPIRO, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616-618.
21. MARTENS, S., WOLTERS, G., & VAN RAAMSDONK, M. (2002). Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1275-1287.
22. NEUMANN, O., & KLOTZ, W. (1994). Motor responses to non-reportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
23. PASHLER, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
24. RAYMOND, J. E., SHAPIRO, K. L., & ARNELL, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
25. SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
26. SHAPIRO, K. L., DRIVER, J., WARD, R., & SORENSEN, R. E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science, 8, 95-100.
27. SOETENS, E., BOER, L. C., & HUETING, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 598-616.
28. STOET, G., & HOMMEL, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
29. VOGEL, E. K., LUCK, S. J., & SHAPIRO, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1656-1674.