Late Miocene diversification and phylogenetic relationships of the huge toads in the Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758) species group (Anura: Bufonidae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 787-797

  Maciel, Natan Medeiros ^a,b   Collevatti, Rosane Garcia ^a   Colli, Guarino Rinaldi ^b   Schwartz, Elisabeth Ferroni ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biogeography; DIVA; Phylogeny; Relaxed Bayesian molecular clock; Rhinella marina group

Indexed keywords

AMINE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; PHYLOGENY; THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY; TOAD;

AMINES; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BUFONIDAE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, THIN LAYER; PHYLOGENY;

ANURA; BUFONIDAE; MYA; ZANCLEA;

EID: 78049404476     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ab'Sáber A.N. Os domínios morfoclimáticos da América do Sul. Primeira aproximação. Geomorfologia 1977, 52:1-21.
2. Azevedo M.F.C., Foresti F., Ramos P.R.R., Jim J. Comparative cytogenetic studies of Bufo ictericus, B. paracnemis (Amphibia, Anura), and an intermediate form in sympatry. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2003, 26:289-294.
3. Baéz, A.M., Gasparini, Z.B., 1979. The South American herpetofauna: an evaluation of the fossil record. In: Duellman, W.E. (Ed.), The South American Herpetofauna. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Monographs, vol. 7, Lawrence, pp. 29-54.
4. Bossuyt F., Milinkovitch M.C. Convergent adaptive radiations in Madagascan and Asian ranid frogs reveal covariation between larval and adult traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:6585-6590.
5. Brandão R.A., Maciel N.M., Sebben A. A new species of Chaunus from Central Brazil (Anura; Bufonidae). J. Herpetol. 2007, 41:304-311.
6. Baéz, A.M., Gasparini, Z.B., 1979. The South American herpetofauna: an evaluation of the fossil record. In: Duellman, W.E. (Ed.), The South American Herpetofauna, vol. 7. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Monographs, Lawrence, pp. 29-54.
7. Braz S.V., Fernandes A.P., Báo S.N. An ultrastructural study of sperm of the genus Bufo (Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae). J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 2004, 36:257-262.
8. Burnham R.J., Graham A. The history of Neotropical vegetation: new developments and status. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1999, 86:546-589.
9. Cannatella, D., 1985. A Phylogeny of Primitive Frogs (Archaeobatrachians). Ph.D. Dissertation. University Kansas, Lawrence.
10. Cei J.M. Bufo of South America. Evolution in the Genus Bufo 1972, 82-92. University of Texas Press, Austin and London. W.F. Blair (Ed.).
11. Cei, J.M., 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monit. Zool. Ital. (N.S.). Monografia.
12. Cei J.M., Erspamer V., Roseghini M. Biogenic amines. Evolution in the Genus Bufo 1972, 233-243. University of Texas Press, Austin and London. W.F. Blair (Ed.).
13. Ceriotti G., Cardellini P., Marian P., Sala M. Chromatographic study of toad venoms for taxonomic purposes. Bull. Zool. 1989, 56:357-360.
14. Coates A.G., Obando J.A. The geological evolution of the Central American Isthmus. Evolution and environment in tropical America. Evolution and Environment in Tropical America 1996, 21-56. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. J.B.C. Jackson, A.F. Budd, A.G. Coates (Eds.).
15. Colli G.R. As origens e a diversificação da herpetofauna do Cerrado. Cerrado: Ecologia, Biodiversidade e Conservação 2005, 247-264. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília. A. Scariot, J.C. Souza-Silva, J.M. Felfili (Eds.).
16. da Silva H., Mendelson J.R.M. A new organ and sternal morphology in toads (Anura: Bufonidae): descriptions, taxonomic distribution, and evolution. Herpetologica 1999, 55:114-126.
17. Daly J.W. Thirty years of discovering arthropod alkaloids in amphibian skin. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61:162-172.
18. de Queiroz K., Gauthier J. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1992, 23:449-480.
19. Del'Arco, J.O., Bezerra, P.E.L., 1989. Geologia. In: Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Ed.), Geografia do Brasil. Região Centro-Oeste, vol. 1. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 35-51.
20. Deulofeu V., Duprat E. The basic constituents of the venom of some South American toads. J. Biol. Chem. 1944, 153:459-463.
21. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
22. Erspamer V. Bioactive secretions of the amphibian integument. Amphibian Biology 1994, 179-186. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton. H. Heatwole, G.T. Barthalmus, A.Y. Heatwole (Eds.).
23. Estes R., Wassersug R. A Miocene toad from Colombia, South America. Breviora Geol. Asturica 1963, 193:1-13.
24. Faivovich J., Haddad C.F.B., Garcia P.C.A., Frost D.R., Campbell J.A., Wheeler W.C. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: a phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2005, 294:1-240.
25. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
26. Frost, D.R., 2010. Amphibian Species of the World: An Online Reference. Version 5.4 (16 July, 2010). Electronic Database Accessible at: American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/.
27. Frost D.R., Grant T., Faivovich J., Bain R.H., Haas A., Haddad C.F.B., de Sa R.O., Channing A., Wilkinson M., Donnellan S.C., Raxworthy C., Campbell J.A., Blotto B.L., Moler P., Drewes R.C., Nussbaum R.A., Lynch J.D., Green D.M., Wheeler W.C. The amphibian tree of life. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2006, 297:1-370.
28. Gamble T., Simons A.M., Colli G.R., Vitt L.J. Tertiary climate change and the diversification of the Amazon gecko genus Gonatodes (Sphaerodactylidae, Squamata). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 46:269-277.
29. Garda A.A., Costa G.C., Colli G.R., Báo S.N. The spermatozoa of the family Pseudidae (Anura, Amphibia), with a test of the hypothesis of correlation between ultrastructure and reproductive modes in anurans. J. Morphol. 2004, 261:196-205.
30. Giugliano L.G., Collevatti R.G., Colli G.R. Molecular dating and phylogenetic relationships among Teiidae (Squamata) inferred by molecular and morphological data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 45:168-179.
31. Grant T., Frost D.R., Caldwell J.P., Gagliardo R., Haddad C.F.B., Kok P.J.R., Means B.D., Noonan B.P., Schargel W.E., Wheeler W.C. Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2006, 299:1-262.
32. Graybeal A. The phylogenetic utility of cytochrome b: lessons from bufonid frogs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1993, 2:256-269.
33. Haas A. Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primarily larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics 2003, 19:23-89.
34. Hanken J., Wassersug R.J. The visible skeleton. A new double-stain technique reveals the native of the " hard" tissues. Funct. Photogr. 1981, 16:22-26.
35. Hedges S.B., Duellman W.E., Heinicke M.P. New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 2008, 1737:1-1182.
36. Hillis D.M., Bull J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993, 42:3-8.
37. Hillis, D.M., Wiens, J.J., 2000. Molecular versus morphological systematics: conflicts, artifacts, and misconceptions. Pages 1-19 in Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. In: Wiens, J.J. (Ed.), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
38. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
39. Leaché A.D., Reeder T.W. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 2002, 51:44-68.
40. Lynch, J.D., 1971. Evolutionary Relationships, Osteology, and Zoogeography of Leptodactyloid Frogs, vol. 53. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Miscelaneous Publications, pp. 1-238.
41. Maciel N.M., Schwartz C.A., Pires O.R., Sebben A., Castro M.S., Sousa M.V., Fontes W., Schwartz E.N.F. Composition of indolealkylamines of Bufo rubescens cutaneous secretions compared to six other Brazilian bufonids with phylogenetic implications. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 134:641-649.
42. Maciel N.M., Schwartz C.A., Colli G.R., Castro M.S., Fontes W., Schwartz E.N.F. A phylogenetic analysis of species in the Bufo crucifer group (Anura: Bufonidae), based on indolealkylamines and proteins from skin secretions. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2006, 34:457-466.
43. Maciel N.M., Brandão R.A., Campos L.A., Sebben A. A large new species of Rhinella (Anura: Bufonidae) from Cerrado of Brazil. Zootaxa 2007, 1627:23-39.
44. Martin R.F. Evidence from osteology. Evolution in the Genus Bufo 1972, 37-70. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas. W.F. Blair (Ed.).
45. Martin R.F. Osteology of North American Bufo: the americanus, cognatus, and boreas species groups. Herpetologica 1972, 29:375-387.
46. Masta S.E., Sullivan B.K., Lamb T.L., Routman E.J. Molecular systematics, hybridization, and phylogeography of the Bufo americanus complex in eastern North America. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 24:302-314.
47. Mendelson III., J.R.M., 1997. The Systematics of the Bufo valliceps Group (Anura: Bufonidae) of Middle America. PhD Dissertation. University of Kansas at Lawrence, Kansas.
48. Moritz C., Patton J.L., Schneider C.J., Smith T.B. Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2000, 31:533-563.
49. Morrison, M., 1994. A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Bufo spinulosus Group (Anura: Bufonidae). PhD Dissertation. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
50. Mulcahy D.G., Morril B.H., Mendelson J.R. Historical biogeography of lowland species of toads (Bufo) across the trans-Mexican neovulcanic belt and the isthmus of Tehuantepec. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:1-15.
51. Narasimhacheri N., Plaut J. The use of o-phthalaldehyde as a spray reagent for the thin-layer chromatography identification and quantitation of bufotenin and 5-methoxy-N:N-dimethyltryptamine. J. Chromatogr. 1971, 57:433-437.
52. Nylander J.A.A., Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P., Nieves-Aldrey J.L. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:47-67.
53. Pauly G.B., Hillis D.M., Cannatella D.C. The history of a Nearctic colonization: molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of the Nearctic toads (Bufo). Evolution 2004, 58:2517-2535.
54. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
55. Pramuk J.B. Prenasal bones and snout morphology in West Indian bufonids and the Bufo granulosus species group. J. Herpetol. 2000, 2:334-340.
56. Pramuk J.B. Combined evidence and cladistic relationships of West Indian toads (Anura: Bufonidae). Herpetol. Monogr. 2002, 16:121-151.
57. Pramuk J.B. Phylogeny of South American Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) inferred from combined evidence. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 146:407-452.
58. Pramuk J.B., Robertson T., Sites J.W., Noonan B.P. Around the world in 10million years: biogeography of the nearly cosmopolitan true toads (Anura: Bufonidae). Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17:72-83.
59. Pregill G. Cranial morphology and the evolution of West Indian toads (Salientia: Bufonidae): resurrection of the genus Peltophryne Fitzinger. Copeia 1981, 1981:273-285.
60. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2007. Tracer v1.4, Available from http://BEAST.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
61. Ronquist F. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: a new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:195-203.
62. Rull V. Speciation timing and Neotropical biodiversity: the tertiary-quaternary debate in the light of molecular evidence. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:2722-2729.
63. Sanchíz, B., 1998. Salientia. In: Wellnhofer, P. (Ed.), Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie Part 4. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich, pp. 1-275.
64. Santos, J.C., Coloma, L.A., Summers, K., Caldwell, J.P., Ree, R., 2009. Amazonian amphibian diversity is primarily derived from Late Miocene Andean lineages. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000056. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000056.
65. Savage J.M. The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions. Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans: Contemporary Research on Major Problems 1973, 351-446. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri. J. Vial (Ed.).
66. Swofford, D.L., 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analyses Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
67. Taylor W.R., Van Dyke G.C. Revised procedures for staining and clearing small fishes and other vertebrates for bone and cartilage study. Cybium 1985, 9:107-119.
68. Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Plewniak F., Jeanmoungin F., Higgins D.G. The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25:4876-4882.
69. Toft C.A., Duellman W.E. Anurans of the lower rio Llullapichis, Amazonian Peru: a preliminary analysis of community structure. Herpetologica 1979, 35:71-77.
70. Toledo R.R., Jared R. Cutaneous granular glands and amphibian venoms. Comp. Biochem. Phys. B 1995, 111:1-29.
71. Trueb L. Patterns of cranial diversity among the Lissamphibia. The Skull, Volume 2: Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity 1993, 255-343. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. J. Hanken, B.K. Hall (Eds.).
72. Tuomisto H. Interpreting the biogeography of South America. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:1294-1295.
73. Vallinoto M., Sequeira F., Sodré D., Bernardi J.A.R., Sampaio I., Schneider H. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Rhinella marina species complex (Amphibia, Bufonidae) revisited: implications for Neotropical diversification hypotheses. Zool. Scr. 2010, 39:128-140.
74. Van Bocxlaer, I., Biju, S.D., Loader, S.P., Bossuyt, F., 2009. Toad radiation reveals into-India dispersal as a source of endemism in the western Ghats-Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 131. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-131.
75. Wesselingh F.P., Salo J.A. A Miocene perspective on the evolution of the Amazon basin. Scr. Geol. 2006, 133:439-458.
76. Wiens J.J., Fetzner J.W., Parkinson C.L., Reeder T.W. Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:719-748.