Molecular phylogeny of the genus Luzula DC. (Juncaceae, Monocotyledones) based on plastome and nuclear ribosomal regions: A case of incongruence, incomplete lineage sorting and hybridisation

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 536-551

  Záveska Drábkova, Lenka ^a,b   Vlček, Čestmír ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

ITS1 5.8S ITS2 plastome; Juncaceae; Luzula; Nuclear ribosomal genes; Phylogeny; TrnL intron; TrnL F intergenic spacer

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PLANT DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANGIOSPERMS; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

JUNCACEAE; LUZULA; LUZULA PILOSA;

EID: 78049380440     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.07.022     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Akaike H. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Second International Symposium Information Theory 1973, 267-281. Akademiai Kiado. B.N. Csaki, F. Petrov (Eds.).
2. Albach D.C., Chase M.W. Incongruence in Veroniceae (Plantaginaceae): evidence from two plastid and a nuclear ribosomal DNA region. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2004, 32:183-197.
3. Álvarez I., Wendel J.F. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2003, 2:417-434.
4. Bailey C.D., Carr T.G., Harris S.A., Hughes C.E. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism: paralogy and pseudogenes. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2003, 29:435-455.
5. Bakker F.T., Culham A., Gomez-Martinez R., Carvalho J., Compton J., Dawtrey R., Gibby M. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in angiosperm cpDNA trnL (UAA)-trnF (GAA) regions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17:1146-1155.
6. Baldwin B.G. Phylogenetic utility of internal transcribed spacer of nuclear DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 1992, 1:3-16.
7. Baldwin B.G., Sanderson M.J., Porter J.M., Wojciechowski M.F., Campbell C.S., Donoghue M.J. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1995, 82:247-277.
8. Balslev, H. 1979. Juncaceae. In: Harling, G., Sparre, B. (eds.), Flora of Ecuador 11, pp. 1-45.
9. Balslev H. Juncaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 68 1996, The New York Botanic Garden, New York.
10. Bänfer G., Moog U., Fiala B., Mohamed M., Weising K., Blattner F.R. A chloroplast genealogy of myrmecophytic Macaranga species (Euphorbiaceae) in Southeast Asia reveals hybridization, vicariance and long-distance dispersals. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:4409-4424.
11. Bräuchler, C., Meimberg, H. Heubl, G. 2010. Molecular phylogeny of Menthinae (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae, Mentheae) - taxonomy, biogeography and conflicts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. Doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.016.
12. Bremer K. Gondwanan evolution of the grass alliance of families (Poales). Evolution 2002, 56:1374-1387.
13. Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9:1657-1659.
14. Cruz-Mazo G., Buide M.L., Sanuel R., Narbona E. Molecular phylogeny of Scorzoneroides (Asteraceae): evolution of heterocarpy and annual habit in unpredictable environments. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2009, 53:835-847.
15. Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 1987, 19:11-15.
16. Drábková L., Kirschner J., Vlček Č. Historical herbarium specimens in molecular taxonomy of the Juncaceae: a comparison of DNA extraction and amplification protocols. Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 2002, 20:161-175.
17. Drábková L., Kirschner J., Seberg O., Petersen G., Vlček Č. Phylogeny of the Juncaceae based on rbcL sequences, with special emphasis on Luzula DC and Juncus L. Plant Syst. Evol. 2003, 240:133-147.
18. Drábková L., Kirschner J., Vlček Č., Pačes V. TrnL-trnF intergenic spacer and trnL intron define clades within Luzula and Juncus (Juncaceae). J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 59:1-10.
19. Drábková L., Kirschner J., Vlček Č. Phylogenetic relationships within Luzula DC and Juncus L. (Juncaceae): a comparison of phylogenetic signals of trnL-trnF intergenic spacer, trnL intron and rbcL plastome sequence data. Cladistics 2006, 22:132-143.
20. Edwards C., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. Molecular phylogeny of Conradina and other shrub mints (Lamiaceae) from the southeastern USA: evidence for hybridization in Pleistocene refugia?. Syst. Bot. 2006, 31:193-207.
21. Farris J.S. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 1989, 5:417-419.
22. Farris J.S., Kallersjö M., Kluge A.G., Bult C. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 1995, 44:570-572.
23. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
24. Fiz O., Valcárcel V., Vargas P. Phylogenetic position of Mediterranean Astereae and character evolution of daisies (Bellis, Asteraceae) inferred from nrDNA ITS sequences. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2002, 25:157-171.
25. Flagel L.E., Rapp R.A., Grover C.E., Widrlechner M.P., Hawkins J., Grafenberg J.L., Álvarez I. Phylogenetic, morphological, and chemotaxonomic incongruence in the North American endemic genus Echinacea. Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:756-765.
26. Gehrke B., Bräuchler C., Romoleroux K., Lundberg M., Huebl G., Eriksson T. Molecular phylogenetics of Alchemilla, Aphanes and Lachemilla (Rosaceae) inferred from plastid and nuclear intron and spacer DNA sequences, with comments on generic classification. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2008, 47:1030-1044.
27. Gielly L., Taberlet P. The use of chloroplast DNA to resolve plant phylogenies: noncoding versus rbcL sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1994, 11:769-777.
28. Gobert V., Moja S., Taberlet P., Wink M. Heterogeneity of three molecular data partition phylogenies of mints related to M. X piperita (Mentha; Lamiaceae). Plant Biol. 2006, 8:470-485.
29. Goloboff P. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 1999, 15:415-428.
30. Goloboff P., Farris J., Källersjö M., Oxelmann B., Ramirez M., Szumik C. Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 2003, 19:324-332.
31. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 1999, 41:95-98.
32. Jakob S.S., Blattner F.R. A chloroplast genealogy of Hordeum (Poaceae): Long-term persisting haplotypes, incomplete lineage sorting, regional extinction, and the consequences for phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:1602-1612.
33. Jones, E., Simpson, D.A., Hodkinson, T.R., Chase, M.W., Parnell, J.A.N. 2007. The Juncaceae-Cyperaceae interface: a combined plastid sequence analysis. In: Columbus, J.T., Friar, E.A., Porter, J.M., Prince, L.M., Simpson, M.G. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution - Poales. (eds.) Aliso 23, pp. 55-61.
34. Katoh K., Misawa K., Kuma K., Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucl. Acids Res. 2002, 30:3059-3066.
35. Kiefer C., Dobeš C., Sharbel T.F., Koch M.A. Phylogeographic structure of the chloroplast DNA gene pool in North American Boechera-A genus and continental-wide perspective. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2009, 52:303-311.
36. Kirschner J. Taxonomic survey of Luzula section Luzula (Juncaceae) in Europe. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 1993, 28:141-182.
37. Juncaceae 1: Rostkovia to Luzula, Species Plantarum: flora of the World Part 6, ABRS 2002, Canberra, Australia. J. Kirschner (Ed.).
38. Juncaceae 1: Rostkovia to Luzula, Species Plantarum: flora of the World Part 7, ABRS 2002, Canberra, Australia. J. Kirschner (Ed.).
39. Juncaceae 1: Rostkovia to Luzula, Species Plantarum: flora of the World Part 8, ABRS 2002, Canberra, Australia. J. Kirschner (Ed.).
40. Kluge A.G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 1989, 38:7-25.
41. Kluge A.G., Farris J.S. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 1969, 18:1-32.
42. Köbele C., Tillich H.-J. The aberrant inflorescence of Luzula elegans Lowe (Juncaceae) compared to other Luzula species. Sendtnera 2002, 8:77-84.
43. Kress W.J., Wurdack K.J., Zimmer E.A., Weigt L.A., Janzen D.H. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:8369-8374.
44. Lachance M.-A.A., Dobson J., Wijayanayaka D.N., Smith A.M. The use of parsimony network analysis for the formal delineation of phylogenetic species of yeasts: Candida apicola, Candida azyma, and Candida parazyma sp. nov., cosmopolitan yeasts associated with floricolous insects. Antonie van Leewenhoek 2009, 97:155-170.
45. Liu Z., Chen Z., Pan J., Li X., Su M., Wang L., Li H., Liu G. Phylogenetic relationships in Leymus (Poaceae: Triticeae) revealed by the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast trnL-F sequences. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2008, 46:278-289.
46. Maddison W.P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
47. Nei M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics 1987, Columbia University Press, New York.
48. Nixon K.C. The parsimony rachet, a new method for rapid phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 1999, 15:407-414.
49. Nixon K.C. WinClada ver. 1.00.08 2002, Published by the author, Ithaca, NY.
50. Nixon K.C., Carpenter J.M. On consensus, collapsibility and clade concordance. Cladistics 1996, 12:305-321.
51. Nordenskiöld H. Cytotaxonomical studies in the genus Luzula. I. Somatic chromosome and chromosome numbers. Hereditas 1951, 37:325-355.
52. Nordenskiöld H. Cytogenetic studies in the genus Luzula in New Zealand. - New Zealand J. Bot. 1966, 4:185-195.
53. Petersen G., Seberg O. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae (Poaceae) based on rpoA sequence data. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 1997, 7(2):217-230.
54. Plunkett G.M., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Brooks R.E. Phylogenetic relationships between Juncaceae and Cyperaceae: insights from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 1995, 82(4):520-525.
55. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. - Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
56. Posada D., Crandall K.A. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into network. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:37-45.
57. Rieseberg L.H., Soltis D.E. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trends Plants 1991, 5:65-83.
58. Rieseberg L.H., Whitton J., Linder C.R. Molecular marker incongruence in plant hybrid zones and phylogenetic trees. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1996, 45:243-262.
59. Roalson E.H. Phylogenetic relationships in the Juncaceae inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence data. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2005, 166(3):397-413.
60. Roalson E.H., Columbus J.T., Friar E.A. Phylogenetic relationships in Cariceae (Cyperaceae) based on ITS (nrDNA) and trnL-F region sequences: assessment of subgeneric and sectional relationships in Carex with emphasis on section Acrocystis. Syst. Bot. 2001, 26:318-341.
61. Ruiz-Sanchez E., Sosa V. Delimiting species boundaries within the Neotropical bamboo Otatea (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) using molecular, morphological and ecological data. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 2010, 54(2):344-356.
62. Rydin C., Kallersjö M., Friis E.M. Seed plant relationships and systematic position of Gnetales based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA: conflicting data, rooting problems, and the monophyly of conifers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2002, 163:197-214.
63. Siddall M.E. Prior agreement: arbitration or arbitrary?. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:765-769.
64. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 75(5):758-771.
65. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusets.
66. van der Niet T., Linder H.P. Dealing with incongruence in the quest for the species tree: a case study from the orchid genus Satyrium. Mol. Phylogent. Evol. 2008, 47:154-174.
67. Wendel J.F., Doyle J.J. Phylogenetic incongruence. window into genome history and molecular evolution. Molecular systematics of plants II: DNAsequencing 1998, 265-296. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. D.E. Soltis, P.S. Soltis, J.J. Doyle (Eds.).
68. Záveská Drábková L., Vlček Č. DNA variation within Juncaceae: comparison of impact of organelles regions on phylogeny. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 278:169-186.
69. Záveská Drábková L., Kirschner J., Štěpánek J., Záveský L., Vlček Č. Analysis of nrDNA polymorphism in closely related diploid sexual, tetraploid sexual and polyploid agamospermous species. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 278:67-85.