The evolution of eLearning Background, blends and blackboard

Science Progress

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 319-334

  Sleator, Roy D ^a  

^a Munster Technological University   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Blended learning; dLearning; eLearning; Learning management systems; mLearning

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONICS; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEM; REVIEW; TEACHING; TELECOMMUNICATION;

ELECTRONICS; HUMANS; LEARNING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS; TEACHING;

EID: 78049368079     PISSN: 00368504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3184/003685010X12710124862922     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Casey, D.M. (2008) A Journey to legitimacy: the historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends: linking research and practice to improve learning, 52, 45-51.
2. Keegan, D. (1988) Problems in defining the field of distance education. Am. J. Dist. Educ., 2, 4-11.
3. Bruder, I. (1989) Distance learning: what's holding back this boundless delivery system? Electron. Learn., 8, 30-35.
4. Holmberg, B. (1995) The evolution of the character and practice of distance education. Open Learn., 10, 47-53.
5. Matthews, D. (1999) The origins of distance education and its use in the United States. THE Journal, 27, 54,6,8,60,2,4,6-7.
6. Moore, M.G.K.G. (1996) Distance education: a systems view. Belmont [etc.]: Wadsworth, 1996:XIV, 290 str.: ilustr.; 25 cm.
7. Potter, C. and Naidoo, G. (2009) Evaluating large-scale interactive radio programmes. Dist. Educ., 30, 117-41.
8. Spain, P.L., Jamison, D.T. and McAnany, E.G. (1977) Radio for education and development: case studies, Vol. I and Vol. II.
9. Colella, C. (1994) TV: Foe or Friend? Momentum, 25, 57-58.
10. Reisslein, J., Seeling, P. and Reisslein, M. (2005) Video in distance education: ITFS vs. web-streaming: Evaluation of student attitudes. Internet Higher Educ., 8, 25-44.
11. Souder, W.E. (1993) The effectiveness of traditional vs. satellite delivery in three management of technology master's degree programs. Am. J. Dist. Educ., 7, 37-53.
12. Teahan, J. (2006) Teaching with an ever-spinning web: instructional uses of web 2.0. NCSSSMST J., 12, 26-27.
13. Schroeder, U. (2009) Web-based learning-yes we can! In: Spaniol, M., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Lau, R.W.H. (eds.), 8th International Conference on Web Based Learning (ICWL 2009), pp. 25-33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
14. Wedemeyer, C.A. and Najem, R.E. (1969) AIM: from concept to reality. the articulated instructional media program at Wisconsin. Notes and Essays on Education for Adults, No.61. Syracuse University Press, Box 8, University Station, Syracuse, New York 13210: Syracuse Univ., NY. Publications Program in Continuing Education., 83.
15. Daniel, J.S. (1996) Mega-universities and knowledge media: technology strategies for higher education. Stylus Publishing, Inc. 22883 Quicksilver Drive, Sterling, VA 20166-2012., 212.
16. New Sloan Survey Shows ''Tremendous Growth'' in Online Learning (2006) Distance Education Report, 10, 6.
17. Young, J.R. (2002) ''Hybrid'' Teaching Seeks To End the Divide between Traditional and Online Instruction. Chron. Higher Educ., 48, A33-A34.
18. Thorne, K. (2003) Blended learning: how to integrate online and traditional learning. London, xii, 148.
19. Ho, W., Higson, H.E., Dey, P.K., Xu, X. and Bahsoon, R. (2009) Measuring performance of virtual learning environment system in higher education. Qual. Assur. Educ.: Int. Persp., 17, 6-29.
20. Bonk, C.J.G.C.R. (2006) The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs, 1st edn, Vol. xxxv, p. 585, Pfeiffer, San Francisco.
21. Ekstrom, I. (2006) The blended learning book: best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. Q. Rev. Dist. Educ., 7, 323-326.
22. Korkmaz, O. and Karakus, U. (2009) The Impact of blended learning model on student attitudes towards geography course and their critical thinking dispositions and levels. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 8, 51-63.
23. Woltering, V., Herrler, A., Spitzer, K. and Spreckelsen, C. (2009) Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv. Health Sci. Educ., 14, 725-738.
24. Mayadas, A.F., Bourne, J. and Bacsich, P. (2009) Online education today. J. Asynchr. Learn. Networks, 13, 49-56.
25. Dugdale, S. (2009) Space strategies for the new learning landscape. EDU-CAUSE Rev., 44, 50-52.
26. Ashraf, B. (2009) Teaching the Google-eyed YouTube generation. Educ. Train., 51, 343-352.
27. Barnard, L., Lan, W.Y., To, Y.M., Paton, V.O. and Lai, S.-L. (2009) Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet Higher Educ., 12, 1-6.
28. Pick, J.B. and Azari, R. (2008) Global digital divide: Influence of socio-economic, governmental, and accessibility factors on information technology. Inform. Technol. Devel., 14, 91-115.
29. Cronje, J.C. (2006) Pretoria to Khartoum-how we taught an internet-supported masters' programme across national, religious, cultural and linguistic barriers. Educ. Technol. Soc., 9, 276-88.
30. Lytras, M.D.(2008) Technology Enhanced Learning: Best Practices, 404.
31. Blended is better. (2004) T+D, 58, 5.
32. Woolf, B.P. (2009) Web-based learning environments. Building intelligent interactive tutors, pp. 337-379. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
33. Coates, H., James, R. and Baldwin, G. (2005) A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tert. Educ. Manag., 11, 19-36.
34. O'Droma, M.S., Ganchev, I. and McDonnell, F. (2003) Architectural and functional design and evaluation of E-Learning VUIS based on the proposed IEEE LTSA reference model. Internet Higher Educ., 6, 263-276.
35. Falvo, D.A. and Johnson, B.F. (2007) The use of learning management systems in the United States. TechTrends: linking research and practice to improve learning, 51, 40-45.
36. Carnevale, D. (2005) Blackboard plans to acquire course-management rival WebCT. Chron. Higher Educ., 52, A44-A.
37. Dealtry, R. (2005) Configuring the Structure and administration of learning management. J. Workplace Learn., 17, 467-477.
38. Moran, S., Kornhaber, M. and Gardner, H. (2006) Orchestrating multiple intelligences. Educ. Leadership, 64, 22-27.
39. Hawkins, B.L. and Rudy, J.A. (2008) EDUCAUSE Core Data Service fiscal year 2007, summary report.
40. Frand, J.L. (2000) The INFORMATION-AGE Mindset. EDUCAUSE Rev., 35, 14.
41. Ellison, N. (2007) Facebook use on campus: a social capital perspective on social network sites. Sixth Annual ECAR Symp., Boca Raton, FL.
42. Strout, E. (2006) Franklin and Marshall College: Competing for Students on their own tech turf. Chron. Higher Educ., 52, 37-38.
43. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2003) Virtual Learning Systems. In: Hossein, B. (ed.), Encyclopedia of information systems, pp. 561-572. Elsevier, New York.
44. Schoening, J.R. (1998) Education reform and its needs for technical standards. Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 20, 159-164.
45. Lessig, L. (1999) Code and other laws of cyberspace, Vol. xii, p. 297. Basic Books, New York.
46. Richard, E. Generation Y forces retailers to keep up with technology, new.
47. Oblinger, D. (2003) Understanding the new students. EDUCAUSE Rev., 38, 36.
48. Poe, J. and McAbee, S. (2007) Electronic reserves, copyright, and CMS integration-six years later. J. Access Serv., 5, 251-263.
49. Andrews, J.G. (2006) How we can resist corporatization? Academe, 92, 16-19.
50. Karadeniz, S. (2009) Flexible design for the future of distance learning. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 1, 358-363.