Layered development and evaluation for intelligent support in exploratory environments: The case of microworlds

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6094 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2010, Pages 105-114

  Gutierrez Santos, Sergio ^a   Mavrikis, Manolis ^b   Magoulas, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Architecture; Evaluation; Exploratory environments

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SUPPORT; EVALUATION; EXPLORATORY ENVIRONMENTS; EXPLORATORY LEARNING; INTELLIGENT SUPPORT; ITS EVALUATION; LEARNING PROCESS; MICROWORLD; PEDAGOGICAL EXPERTS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; SCAFFOLDS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 78049363839     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Lynch, C.F., Ashley, K.D., Aleven, V., Pinkwart, N.: Defining ill-defined domains; a literature survey. In: Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006): Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains (2006).
2. Joolingen, W.R., Zacharia, Z.C.: Developments in inquiry learning. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (eds.) TEL, pp. 21-37 (2009).
3. Mayer, R.E.: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? - the case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 14-19 (2004). (Pubitemid 38161472)
4. Murray, T.: Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: An analysis of the state of the art. International journal of artificial intelligence in education 10, 98-129 (1999).
5. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 139- 159 (1991).
6. Paramythis, A., Weibelzahl, S.: A decomposition model for the layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 438-442. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).
7. Webber, C., Pesty, S., Balacheff, N.: A multi-agent and emergent approach to learner modelling. In: Eur. Conf. on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 98-102 (2002).
8. Duquesnoy, L., Berger, J.-L., Prévôt, P., Sandoz-Guermond, F.: SIMPA: A training platform in work station including computing tutors. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 507-520. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).
9. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Evaluating recommender explanations: Problems experienced and lessons learned for the evaluation of adaptive systems. In: 6th Workshop on User-Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, UMAP (2009).
10. Sharples, M., Jeffery, N., du Boulay, B., Teather, D., Teather, B.: Socio-cognitive engineering. In: European Conference on Human Centred Processes (1999).
11. Boehm, B.: A spiral model of software development and enhancement. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 11(4), 14-24 (1986).
12. Johnson, L.W., Beal, C.: Iterative evaluation of a large-scale, intelligent game for language learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 290-297 (2005).
13. Conlon, T., Pain, H.: Persistent collaboration: a methodology for applied AIED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7, 219-252 (1996).
14. Weibelzahl, S., Weber, G.: Evaluating the inference mechanism of adaptive learning systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2702, pp. 154-168. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).
15. Magoulas, G.D., Chen, S.Y., Papanikolaou, K.A.: Integrating layered and heuristic evaluation for adaptive learning environments. In: Workshop on Empirical Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, Int. Conf. on User Modeling (2003).
16. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems (Interactive Technologies), 1st edn., September 1997. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1997).
17. El-Sheikh, E., Sticklen, J.:Generating intelligent tutoring systems from reusable components and knowledge-based systems. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 199-207. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).
18. Linn, J.G., Segedy, J., Jeong, H., Podgursky, B., Biswas, G.: A reconfigurable architecture for building intelligent learning environments. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED 2009, pp. 115-122 (2009).
19. Debedzic, V.: Applying patterns to its architectures. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C.(eds.) ITS2000.LNCS, vol. 1839, pp.123-132.Springer, Heidelberg (2000).
20. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Mavrikis, M., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Pearce, D.: Broadening the sense of 'dynamic': a microworld to support students' mathematical generalisation. Int. Journal on Mathematics Education 41(4), 493-503 (2009).
21. Cocea, M., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Magoulas, G.: The challenge of intelligent support in exploratory learning environments: A study of the scenarios. In: Workshop in Intelligent Support for Exploratory Environments, ECTEL 2008 (2008).
22. Mavrikis, M., Gutierrez-Santos, S.: Not all wizards are from Oz: Iterative design of intelligent learning environments by communication capacity tapering. Computers & Education (in press).
23. Cocea, M., Magoulas, G.: Context-dependent personalised feedback prioritisation in exploratory learning for mathematical generalisation. In: Houben, G.-J., Mc- Calla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 271-282. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).
24. Wood, H.: Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers & Education 33(2-3) (1999).