Chinese number words, culture, and mathematics learning

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 180-206

  Ng, Sharon Sui Ngan ^a   Rao, Nirmala ^b  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Chinese number words; culture; language; mathematics; preschool

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049362792     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0034654310364764     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Ansari, D. (2008). Effect of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 278-291.
2. Aunio, P., Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R., Pan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2008). Children's early numeracy in England, Finland and People's Republic of China. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(3), 203-221.
3. Aunio, P., Ee, J., Lim, S.E.A., Hautamaki, J., & Luit, J.E.H. (2004). Young children's number sense in Finland, Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Early Years Education, 12(3), 195-216.
4. Aunio, P., Niemivirta, M., Hautamaki, J., Van Luit, J.E.H., Shi, J., & Zhang, M. (2006). Young children's number sense in China and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 483-502.
5. Baroody, A.J. (2004). The developmental bases for early childhood number and operations standards. In D. H. Clements & J. Sarama (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 173-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Brysbaert, M., Fias, W., & Noël, M. (1998). The Whorfian hypothesis and numerical cognition: Is twenty-four processed in the same way as four-and-twenty?Cognition, 66, 51-77.
7. Cai, J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED396958).
8. Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students' solving process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 2, 309-340.
9. Cai, J. (2003). Investigating parental roles in students' learning of mathematics from a cross-national perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 87-106.
10. Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problems solving?Impact of early algebra learning and teachers' beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 135-167.
11. Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). U.S. and Chinese students' generalized and generative thinking in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 410-421.
12. Cai, J., Lin, F.L., & Fan, L. (2004). How do Chinese learn mathematics?Some evidence-based insights and needed directions. In L. H. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 535- 554). Singapore: World Scientific.
13. Campbell, J.I.D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 299-315.
14. Cantlon, J.F., & Brannon, E.M. (2006). Adding up the effects of cultural experience on the brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 1-4.
15. Chen, C.S., & Stevenson, H.W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66, 1215-1234.
16. Correa, C.A., Perry, M., Sim, L.M., Miller, K.F., & Fang, G. (2008). Connected and culturally embedded beliefs: Chinese and US teachers talk about how their students best learn mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 140-153.
17. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
18. Fiez, J.A. (2000). Sound and meaning: How native language affects reading strategies. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 3-5.
19. Fuson, K.C. (1982). An analysis of the counting-on solution procedure in addition. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 67-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Fuson, K.C. (1988). Children's counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Fuson, K.C. (1992a). Research on learning and teaching addition and subtraction of whole numbers. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 53-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Fuson, K.C. (1992b). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 243-275). New York: Macmillan.
23. Fuson, K.C., & Kwon, Y. (1991). Chinese-based regular and European irregular systems of number words: The disadvantages for English-speaking children. In K. Durkin, & B. Shire (Eds.), Language and mathematical education (pp. 211-226). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
24. Fuson, K.C., & Kwon, Y. (1992a). Korean children's single-digit addition and subtraction: Numbers structured by ten. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 148-165.
25. Fuson, K.C., & Kwon, Y. (1992b). Korean children's understanding of multidigit addition and subtraction. Child Development, 63, 491-506.
26. Fuson, K.C., & Li, Y. (2009). Cross-cultural issues in linguistic, visual-quantitative, and written-numeric supports for mathematical thinking. ZDM Mathematics Education. Retrieved August 1, 2009, from http://springerlink.com/content/p6030540r5p56466/.
27. Geary, D.C. (1994). Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Geary, D.C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children's cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50, 24-37.
29. Geary, D.C. (1996). Biology, culture and cross-national differences in mathematical ability. In R. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 145-171). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Geary, D.C., Bow-Thomas, C.C., Fan, L., & Siegler, R.S. (1993). Even before formal instruction, Chinese children outperform American children in mental addition. Cognitive Development, 8, 517-529.
31. Geary, D.C., Bow-Thomas, C.C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R.S. (1996). Development of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American children: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Development, 67, 2002-2044.
32. Geary, D.C., Fan, L., & Bow-Thomas, C.C. (1992). Numerical cognition: Loci of ability differences comparing children from China and the United States. Psychological Science, 3, 180-185.
33. Gelman, R., & Butterworth, B. (2005). Number and language: How they are related?Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(1), 6-10.
34. Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(5), 406-413.
35. Han, Y., & Ginsburg, H.P. (2001). Chinese and English mathematics language: The relation between linguistic clarity and mathematics performance. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(2/3), 201-220.
36. Ho, C.S. H., & Fuson, K.C. (1998). Children's knowledge of teen quantities as tens and ones: Comparisons of Chinese, British, and American kindergarteners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 536-544.
37. Howard-Jones, P., Pickering, S., & Diack, A. (2007). Perceptions of the role of neuroscience in education. Innovation Investigation (Tech. Rep. No. 6). Bristol, UK: University of Bristol, Innovation Unit.
38. Huntsinger, C.S., Jose, P.E., Liaw, F.R., & Ching, W.D. (1997). Cultural differences in early mathematics learning: A comparison of Euro-American, Chinese-American, and Taiwan-Chinese families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21(2), 371-388.
39. Imbo, I., & Vandierendonck, A. (2007). The development of strategy use in elementary school children: Working memory and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 284-309.
40. Jin, C.P. (1999). [The characteristics in the development of mathematics education among nations of Chinese language zone]. Journal of Jilin Teachers College, 20(6), 51-53.
41. Kelly, M.K., Miller, K.F., Fang, G., & Feng, G. (1999). When days are numbered: Calendar structure and the development of calendar processing in English and Chinese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 289-314.
42. Klein, J.S., & Bisanz, J. (2000). Preschoolers doing arithmetic: The concepts are willing but the working memory is weak. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 105-115.
43. LeFevre, J., & Liu, J. (1997). The role of experience in numerical skill: Multiplication performance in adults from Canada and China. Mathematical Cognition, 3(1), 31-62.
44. Leung, F.K.S. (1995). The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 297-325.
45. Leung, F.K.S. (1998, Summer). The implications of Confucianism for education today. Journal of Thought, pp. 25-36.
46. Leung, F.K.S. (1999). The traditional Chinese views of mathematics and education: Implications for mathematics education in the New Millennium. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 240- 247). London: Falmer Press.
47. Leung, F.K.S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 35-51.
48. Leung, F.K.S. (2005). Some characteristics of East Asian mathematics classrooms based on data from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 199-215.
49. Leung, F.K.S. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter?In F. K. S. Leung, G. Leung, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural tradition: A comparative study of East Asia and the West, the 13th ICMI Study (pp. 21-46). New York: Springer.
50. Leung, F.K.S., & Park, K. (2002). Competent students, competent teachers?International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 113-129.
51. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Martin, T. (2009). A theory of physically distributed learning: How external environments and internal states interact in mathematics learning. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 140-144.
53. Miller, K.F., Kelly, M., & Zhou, X. (2005). Learning mathematics in China and the United States: Cross-cultural insights into the nature and course of preschool mathematical development. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 163-178). New York: Psychology Press.
54. Miller, K.F., Major, S.M., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2000). Ordinal knowledge: Number names and number concepts in Chinese and English. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 129-139.
55. Miller, K.F., & Paredes, D. (1996). On the shoulders of giants: Cultural tools and mathematical development. In R. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 83-117). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Miller, K.F., Smith, C.M., Zhu, J., & Zhang, H. (1995). Preschool origins of cross-national differences in mathematical competence: The role of number-naming systems. Psychological Science, 6(1), 56-60.
57. Miller, K.F., & Stigler, J.W. (1987). Counting in Chinese: Cultural variation in a basic cognitive skill. Cognitive Development, 2(3), 279-305.
58. Miller, K.F., & Zhu, J. (1991). The trouble with teens: Accessing the structure of number names. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 48-68.
59. Miura, I.T., Kim, C.C., Chang, C.M., & Okamoto, Y. (1988). Effects of language characteristics on children's cognitive representation of numbers: Cross-national comparisons. Child Development, 59, 1445-1450.
60. Miura, I.T., Okama, Y., Kim, C.C., Chang, C.M., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. (1994). Comparisons of children's cognitive representation of number: China, France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 401-411.
61. Miura, I.T., Okama, Y., Valhovic-Stetic, V., Kim, C.C., & Han, J.H. (1999). Language supports for children's understanding of numerical fractions: Cross-national comparisons. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 356-365.
62. Miura, I.T., & Okamoto, Y. (1989). Comparison of U.S. and Japanese first graders' cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 109-114.
63. Miura, I.T., & Okamoto, Y. (2003). Language supports for mathematics understanding and performance. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise. Studies in mathematics thinking and learning (pp. 229-242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., & Chrostowski, S.J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA's trends in inter-national mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
65. Murata, A. (2004). Paths to learning ten-structured understanding of teen sums: Addition solution methods of Japanese Grade 1 students. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 185-218.
66. Murata, A. (2008). Mathematics teaching and learning as a mediating process: The case of tape diagrams. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 374-406.
67. Murata, A., & Fuson, K.C. (2006). Teaching as assisting individual constructive paths within an interdependent class learning zone: Japanese first graders learning to add using ten. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 421-456.
68. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics: An overview. Reston, VA: Author.
69. Paik, J.H., & Mix, K.S. (2003). U.S. and Korean children's comprehension of fraction names: A re-examination of cross-national differences. Child Development, 74, 144-154.
70. Park, K. (2001). The findings and implications from the TIMSS and TIMSS-R Korean data. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 9(1), 123-136.
71. Park, K., & Leung, F.K.S. (2006). A comparative study of the mathematics textbooks of China, England, Japan, Korea, and the United States. In G. Leung & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West. The 13th ICMI Study (pp. 227-238). New York: Springer.
72. Rao, N., Chi, J., & Cheng, K.M. (2009). Teaching mathematics: Observations from urban and rural primary schools in Mainland China. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 211-231). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre/Springer Academic.
73. Rao, N., Ng, S.S. N., & Pearson, E. (2009). Preschool pedagogy: A fusion of traditional Chinese beliefs and contemporary notions of appropriate practice. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 255-279). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre/ Springer Academic.
74. Rasmussen, C., Ho, E., Nicoladis, E., Leung, J., & Bisanz, J. (2006). Is the Chinese number-naming system transparent?Evidence from Chinese-English bilingual children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 60-67.
75. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Concrete computer manipulatives in mathematics education. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 145-150.
76. Saxton, M., & Towse, J. (1998). Linguistic relativity: The case of place value in multidigit numbers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69,66-79.
77. Song, M.J., & Ginsburg, H.P. (1988). The effect of the Korean number system on young children's counting: A natural experiment in numerical bilingualism. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 319-332.
78. Stern, E. (2005). Pedagogy meets neuroscience. Science, 310, 745.
79. Stevenson, H.W., Chen, C., & Lee, S.Y. (1993). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: Ten years later. Science, 259(5091), 53-58.
80. Stevenson, H.W., & Lee, S.Y. (1990). Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese children. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for Research in Child Development.
81. Stevenson, H.W., Lee, S.Y., & Stigler, J.W. (1986). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. Science, 233, 693-699.
82. Stevenson, H.W., & Stigler, J.W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Touchstone.
83. Stevenson, H.W., Stigler, J.W., Lee, S.Y., Lucker, G.W., Kitamura, S., & Hsu, C.C. (1985). Cognitive performance and academic achievement of Japanese, Chinese, and American children. Child Development, 56, 718-734.
84. Stigler, J.M., Lee, S.Y., Lucker, W., & Stevenson, H.W. (1982). Curriculum and achievement in mathematics: A study of elementary school children in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 315-322.
85. Stigler, J.W., Lee, S.Y., & Stevenson, H.W. (1986). Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited store. Cognition, 23, 1-20.
86. Sy, S.S., Fang, G., & Huntsinger, C.S. (2003). Formal instruction and kindergarten achievement in China and the United States. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 4(2), 247-267.
87. Tang, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, K., Feng, S., Ji, Y., Shen, J., Reiman, E.M., & Liu, Y. (2006). Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 103(28), 10775-10780.
88. Thompson, A.G. (1984). Teachers' conceptions of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127.
89. Thompson, A.G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
90. Uttal, D.H., O'Doherty, K., Newland, R., Hand, L.L., & DeLoache, J. (2009). Dual representation and the linking of concrete and symbolic representations. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 156-159.
91. Venkatraman, V., Siong, S.C., Chee, M.W.L., & Ansari, D. (2004). Effect of language switching on arithmetic: A bilingual fMRI study. Science, 306(5695), 441-443.
92. Wong, N.Y., Lam, C.C., Wong, K.M.P., Leung, F.K.S., & Mok, I.A.C. (2001). Students' views of mathematics learning: A cross-sectional survey in Hong Kong, Education Journal, 29(2), 38-59.
93. Zhang, J. (2006). Chinese Source[Maths education for children in China from the angle of Sino-US cultural difference]. Chinese Source(Chinese Source) Early Childhood Education (Educational Sciences), 319, 19-22.
94. Zhang, H., & Zhou, Y. (2003). The teaching of mathematics in Chinese elementary schools. International Journal of Psychology, 38(5), 286-298.
95. Zur, O., & Gelman, R. (2004). Young children can add and subtract by predicting and checking. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 121-137.