On the acceptability of meta-arguments

Proceedings - 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2009

Volumn 2, Issue , 2009, Pages 259-262

  Boella, Guido ^a   Van Der Torre, Leendert ^b   Villata, Serena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION SEMANTICS; TOULMIN;

SEMANTICS;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 78049282294     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WI-IAT.2009.159     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, "Inferring from inconsistency in preferencebased argumentation frameworks," J. Autom. Reasoning, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 125-169, 2002.
2. S. Modgil, "An abstract theory of argumentation that accommodates defeasible reasoning about preferences," in ECSQARU, 2007, pp. 648- 659.
3. H. Barringer, D. M. Gabbay, and J. Woods, "Temporal dynamics of support and attack networks: From argumentation to zoology," Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning, pp. 59-98, 2005.
4. C. Cayrol and M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex, "On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks," in ECSQARU, 2005, pp. 378-389.
5. A. Bondarenko, P. M. Dung, R. A. Kowalski, and F. Toni, "An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning," Artif. Intell., vol. 93, pp. 63-101, 1997.
6. S. Toulmin, The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
7. G. Boella, L. van der Torre, and S. Villata, "Attack relations among dynamic coalitions," in BNAIC 2008.
8. - -, "Social viewpoints for arguing about coalitions," in PRIMA, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, T. D. Bui, T. V. Ho, and Q.-T. Ha, Eds., vol. 5357. Springer, 2008, pp. 66-77.
9. S. Modgil, "Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks," Artif. Intell., vol. 173, no. 9-10, pp. 901-934, 2009.
10. P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida, "Encompassing attacks to attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks," in ECSQARU, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, C. Sossai and G. Chemello, Eds., vol. 5590. Springer, 2009, pp. 83-94.
11. P. Baroni and M. Giacomin, "On principle-based evaluation of extensionbased argumentation semantics," Artif. Intell., vol. 171, no. 10-15, pp. 675-700, 2007.
12. H. Jakobovits and D. Vermeir, "Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks," J. Log. Comput., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 215-261, 1999.
13. M. Caminada, "On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation," in JELIA, 2006, pp. 111-123.
14. R. Loui, "A citation based reflection on Toulmin and argument," in Arguing On The Toulmin Model: New Essays In Argument Analysis And Evaluation, D. Hitchcock and B. Verheij, Eds., 2007, pp. 31-38.
15. D. Hitchcock and B. Verheij, "Introduction," in Arguing On The Toulmin Model: New Essays In Argument Analysis And Evaluation, 2007, pp. 1- 23.
16. T. J. Bench-Capon, "Specification and implementation of Toulmin dialogue game," in JURIX, 1998, pp. 5-20.