Molecular phylogenetics of Ruscaceae sensu lato and related families (Asparagales) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences

Annals of Botany

Volumn 106, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 775-790

  Kim, Joo Hwan ^a,b   Kim, Dong Kap ^a   Forest, Felix ^b   Fay, Michael F ^b   Chase, Mark W ^b  

^a Gachon University   (South Korea)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aphyllanthes; Asparagaceae; Convallariaceae; Dracaenaceae; Eriospermum; monocot phylogenetics; Nolinaceae; Nolinoideae

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BOOTSTRAPPING; CLADISTICS; DATA SET; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MONOCOTYLEDON; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; PLASTID; TAXONOMY; TOPOLOGY; VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION;

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

BAYES THEOREM; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; LILIACEAE; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

AGAPANTHACEAE; AGAVACEAE; ALLIACEAE; APHYLLANTHES; ASPARAGACEAE; ASPARAGALES; ASPHODELACEAE; COMOSPERMUM; DISPOROPSIS; ERIOSPERMUM; HEMEROCALLIDACEAE; HYACINTHACEAE; LAXMANNIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; RUSCACEAE; THEMIDACEAE; XANTHORRHOEACEAE;

EID: 78049266371     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq167     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 18: 531-553.
2. APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
3. APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105-121.
4. Arber A. 1924. Danae, Ruscus and Semele: a morphological study. Annals of Botany 38: 229-260.
5. Bentham G, Hooker JD. 1883. Liliaceae. Genera Plantarum. London: Reeve.
6. Bogler DJ, Simpson BB. 1995. A chloroplast DNA study of the Agavaceae. Systematic Botany 20: 191-205.
7. Bogler DJ, Simpson BB. 1996. Phylogeny of Agavaceae based on ITS rDNA sequence variation. American Journal of Botany 83: 1225-1235.
8. Bogler DJ, Pires JC, Francisco-Ortega J. 2006. Phylogeny of Agavaceae based on ndhF, rbcL and ITS sequences: implications of molecular data for classification. In: Columbus JT, Friar EA, Hamilton CW, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG eds. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 313-328.
9. Carpenter JM. 1988. Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. Cladistics 4: 291-296.
10. Chase MW, Duvall MR, Hills HG, et al. 1995a. Molecular phylogenetic of Lilianae. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 109-137.
11. ChaseMW, Stevenson DW,Wilkin P, Rudall PJ. 1995b. Monocots systematics: a combined analysis. In: Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 685-730.
12. Chase MW, Rudall PJ, Conran JG. 1996. New circumscription and a new family of asparagoid lilies: genera formerly included in Anthericaceae. Kew Bulletin 51: 667-680.
13. Chase MW, Rudall PJ, Conran JG. 1997. Validation of the family name Boryaceae. Kew Bulletin 52: 416.
14. Chase MW, de Bruijn AY, Cox AV, et al. 2000a. Phylogenetics of Asphodelaceae (Asparagales): an analysis of plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Annals of Botany 86: 935-951.
15. Chase MW, Solitis DS, Soltis PS, et al. 2000b. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA eds. Monocots, systematic and evolution. Melbourne: CSIRO, 3-16.
16. Chase MW, Fay MF, Devey DS, et al. 2006. Multigene analyses of monocot relationships: a summary. In: JT Columbus, Friar EA, Hamilton CW, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG eds. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 63-75.
17. Chupov VS, Cutjavina NG. 1980. Phylogeny of some groups of Liliales based on the data of serological analysis. In: Zhilin SG ed. Systematics and evolution of higher plants. Leningrad: Nauka, 101-110.
18. Clarkson JJ, Knapp S, Garcia VF, Olmstead RG, Leitch AR, Chase MW. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships in Nicotiana (Solanaceae) inferred from multiple plastid DNA regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 75-90.
19. Conran JG. 1989. Cladisitic analyses of some net-veined Liliiflorae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 168: 123-141.
20. Conran JG. 1998. Aphyllanthaceae. In: Kubitzki K ed. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 3. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21. Conran JG, Tamura MN. 1998. Convallariaceae. In: Kubitzki K ed. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 3. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. Conran JG, Chase MW, Rudall PJ. 1997. Two new monocot families: Anemarrhenaceae and Behniaceae (Lilianae: Asparagales). Kew Bulletin 52: 995-999.
23. Cooney-Sovetts C, Sattler R. 1986. Phylloclade development in Asparagaceae: an example of homoeosis. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 94: 327-371.
24. Cutler DF. 1992. Vegetative anatomy of Ophiopogoneae (Convallariaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 110: 385-419.
25. Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
26. Devey DS, Leitch I, Rudall PJ, Pires JC, Pillon Y, Chase MW. 2006. Systematics of Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu lato, with an emphasis on Bulbine. In: JT Columbus, Friar EA, Hamilton CW, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG eds. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 345-351.
27. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
28. Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
29. Fay MF, Chase MW. 1996. Resurrection of Themidaceae for Brodiaea alliance and recircumscription of Alliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Agapanthoideae. Taxon 45: 441-451.
30. Fay MF, Rudall PJ, Sullivan S, et al. 2000. Phylogenetic studies of Asparagales based on four plastid DNA regions. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. Melbourne: CSIRO, 360-371.
31. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
32. Fitch WM. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
33. Furness CA, Rudall PJ. 1999. Microsporogenesis in monocotyledons. Annals of Botany 84: 475-499.
34. Givnish TJ, Pires JC, Graham SW, et al. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of monocots based on the highly informative plastid gene ndhF: evidence for widespread concerted convergence. In: Columbus JT, Friar EA, Hamilton CW, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG eds. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 28-51.
35. Graham SW, Zgurski JM, McPherson MC, et al. 2006. Robust inference of monocot deep phylogeny using an expanded multigene plastid data set. In: Columbus JT, Friar EA, Hamilton CW, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG eds. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 3-21.
36. Hilu K, Borsch DT, Muller K, et al. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. American Journal of Botany 90: 1758-1776.
37. Huber H. 1969. Die Samenmerkale und Verwandtschaftsverháltnisse der Liliifloren. Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung Múnchen 8: 219-538.
38. Hutchinson J. 1934. The families of flowering plants. Vol. 2. Monocotyledons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. Jang CG, Pfosser M. 2002. Phylogenetics of Ruscaceae sensu lato based on plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Stapfia 80: 333-348.
40. Johnson LA, Soltis DE. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu lato and Gilla (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
41. Kelchner SA. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482-498.
42. Kim S-C, Lee NS. 2007. Generic delimitation and biogeography of Maianthemum and Smilacina (Ruscaceae sensu lato): preliminary results based on partial 3' matK gene and trnK 3' intron sequences of cpDNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 265: 1-12.
43. Krause K. 1930. Liliaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K eds. Die Natúrlichen Pflanzanfamilien, Vol. 15a. Leipzig: Engelmann, 227-386.
44. LaFrankie JV. 1985a. Morphological and systematic studies in the genus Smilacina (Liliaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
45. LaFrankie JV. 1985b. A note on seedling morphology and establishment growth in the genus Smilacina (Liliaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 112: 313-317.
46. LaFrankie JV. 1986. Transfer of species of Smilacina to Maianthemum (Liliaceae). Taxon 35: 584-589.
47. Lu AM. 1985. Embryology and possible relationships of Eriospermum. Nordic Journal of Botany 5: 229-240.
48. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2000. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. ver. 4.0. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
49. Nickrent DL, Soltis DE. 1995. A comparison of angiosperm phylogenies from nuclear 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 208-234.
50. Nylander JAA. 2005. MrModeltest ver. 2.2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
51. Olmstead RG, Michaels HJ, Scott KM, Palmer JD. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
52. Pires JC, Maureira IJ, Givnish TJ, et al. 2006. Phylogeny, genome size, and chromosome evolution of Asparagales. In: Columbus JT, Friar EA, Hamilton CW, Porter JM, Prince LM, Simpson MG eds. Monocots: comparative biology and evolution. Claremont, CA: Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 287-304.
53. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, van der Mark P. 2005. MrBayes 3.1 Manual.
54. Rudall PJ, Campbell G. 1999. Flower and pollen structure of Ruscaceae in relation to Aspidistreae and other Convallariaceae. Flora 194: 201-214.
55. Rudall PJ, Chase MW. 1996. Systematics of Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu lato: evidence for polyphyly. Telopea 6: 629-647.
56. Rudall PJ, Furness CA, Chase MW, Fay MF. 1997. Microsporogenesis and pollen sulcus type in Asparagales (Lilianae). Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 408-430.
57. Rudall PJ, Engelman EM, Hanson L, Chase MW. 1998. Systematics of Hemiphylacus, Anemarrhena and Asparagus. Plant Systematics and Evolution 211: 181-199.
58. Rudall PJ, Conran JG, Chase MW. 2000. Systematics of Ruscaceae/ Convallariaceae: a combined morphological and molecular investigation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 73-92.
59. Sato D. 1942. Karyotype alteration and phylogeny in Liliaceae and allied families. Japanese Journal of Botany 12: 57-161.
60. Sharma AK, Chaudhuri U. 1964. Cytological studies as an aid in assessing the status of Sansevieria, Ophiopogon and Curculigo. Nucleus 7: 43-58.
61. Shinwari ZK. 2000. Chloroplast DNA variation in Polygonatae sensu lato (Liliaceae). Pakistan Journal of Botany 32: 7-14.
62. Shinwari ZK, Kato H, Terauchi R, Kawano S. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among genera in the Liliaceae-Asparagoideae-Polygonatae s.l. inferred from rbcL gene sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 192: 263-277.
63. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Nickrent DL, et al. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 1-49.
64. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, et al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461.
65. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 1998. Molecular evolution of 18S rDNA in angiosperms: implications for character weighting in phylogenetic analysis. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ eds. Molecular systematics of plants. II. DNA sequencing. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 188-210.
66. Swofford DL. 2007. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, ver. 4.10b. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
67. Takhtajan AL. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
68. Tamura MN. 1995. A karyological review of the orders Asparagales and Liliales (Monocotyledonae). Feddes Report 106: 83-111.
69. Tamura MN, Yamashita J. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analysis of plastid matK and rbcL gene sequences. Journal of Plant Research 117: 109-120.
70. Thomson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882.
71. Utech FH. 1979. Floral vascular anatomy of the Himalayan Theropogon pallidus Maxim. (Liliaceae-Convallarieae). Annals of Carnegie Museum 48: 25-41.
72. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ eds. A guide to methods and applications. New York, NY: Academic Press, 315-322.
73. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. 2008. Published by the Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, on the Internet (http://www.kew.org/wcsp/), accessed in January 2008.
74. Yamashita J, Tamura MN. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the Convallariaceae (Asparagales). In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. Melbourne: CSIRO, 387-400.
75. Yamashita J, Tamura MN. 2004. Phylogenetic analyses and chromosome evolution in Convallarieae (Ruscaceae sensu lato), with some taxonomic treatments. Journal of Plant Research 117: 363-370.