Effects of inbreeding on aversive learning in Drosophila

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2333-2345

  Nepoux, V ^a   Haag, C R ^b   Kawecki, T J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dominance; Genetic variation; Inbreeding depression; Memory; Purging

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; DOMINANCE; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FITNESS; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MEMORY; PLEIOTROPY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SURVIVAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INBREEDING; ODOR; PHYSIOLOGY; SURVIVAL; SWITZERLAND;

ANIMALS; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENETIC VARIATION; INBREEDING; ODORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SWITZERLAND;

ANIMALIA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 77958591068     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02094.x     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Abu-Rabia, S. & Maroun, L. 2005. The effect of consanguineous marriage on reading disability in the Arab community. Dyslexia 11: 1-21.
2. Acevedo-Whitehouse, K., Gulland, F., Greig, D. & Amos, W. 2003. Inbreeding: disease susceptibility in California sea lions. Nature, 422: 35.
3. Afzal, M. 1988. Consequences of consanguinity on cognitive behavior. Behav. Genet. 18: 583-594.
4. Ala-Honkola, O., Uddstrom, A., Pauli, B.D. & Lindstrom, K. 2009. Strong inbreeding depression in male mating behaviour in a poeciliid fish. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 1396-1406.
5. Aspi, J. 2000. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana. Heredity 84: 273-282.
6. Bader, P.I., Dougherty, S., Cangany, N., Raymond, G. & Jackson, C.E. 2000. Infantile refsum disease in four Amish sibs. Am. J. Med. Genet. 90: 110-114.
7. Ballou, J.D. 1997. Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. J. Hered. 88: 169-178.
8. Bashi, J. 1977. Effects of inbreeding on cognitive performance. Nature 266: 440-442.
9. Biemont, C. 1976. Interactions between ageing and inbreeding effects on development of Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Mech. Ageing Dev. 5: 315-324.
10. Biemont, C. 1978. Inbreeding effects: evidence for a genetic system which regulates viability in Drosophila melanogaster populations. Mech. Ageing Dev. 8: 21-42.
11. Brewer, B.A., Lacy, R.C., Foster, M.L. & Alaks, G. 1990. Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. J. Hered. 81: 257-266.
12. Burger, J.M., Kolss, M., Pont, J. & Kawecki, T.J. 2008. Learning ability and longevity: a symmetrical evolutionary trade-off in Drosophila. Evolution 62: 1294-1304.
13. Castle, W.E. 1906. Inbreeding, cross-breeding and sterility in Drosophila. Science 23: 153.
14. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
15. Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet. Res. 74: 329-340.
16. Crnokrak, P. & Barrett, S.C. 2002. Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 2347-2358.
17. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D.A. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270.
18. Crow, J.F. 1986. Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative, and Evolutionary Genetics. W.H. Freeman & Company, New York.
19. Crow, J. & Kimura, M. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.
20. Davenport, C.B. 1908. Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28: 454-455.
21. David, J.R. & Clavel, M.F. 1965. Intéraction entre le génotype et le milieu d'élevage, conséquences sur les caractéristiques de la drosophile. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 99: 369-378.
22. Davis, R.L. 2005. Olfactory memory formation in Drosophila: from molecular to systems neuroscience. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28: 275-302.
23. Deng, H.W., Fu, Y.X. & Lynch, M. 1998. Inferring the major genomic mode of dominance and overdominance. Genetica 102-103: 559-567.
24. DeRose, M.A. & Roff, D.A. 1999. A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 53: 1288-1292.
25. Dewsbury, D.A., Oglesby, J.M., Shea, S.L. & Connor, J.L. 1979. Inbreeding and copulatory behavior in house mice: a further consideration. Behav. Genet. 9: 151-163.
26. Dobzhansky, T. & Spassky, N.P. 1962. Genetic drift and natural selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 48: 148-156.
27. Dudai, Y., Jan, Y.N., Byers, D., Quinn, W.G. & Benzer, S. 1976. dunce, a mutant of Drosophila deficient in learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 73: 1684-1688.
28. Dudash, M.R. & Carr, D.E. 1998. Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems. Nature 393: 682-684.
29. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2009. Components of change in the evolution of learning and unlearned preference. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276: 3201-3208.
30. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3th edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex.
31. Glémin, S. 2003. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating Evolution 57: 2678-2687.
32. Harker, K.T. & Whishaw, I.Q. 2002. Place and matching-to-place spatial learning affected by rat inbreeding (Dark-Agouti, Fischer 344) and albinism (Wistar, Sprague-Dawley) but not domestication (wild rat vs. Long-Evans, Fischer-Norway). Behav. Brain Res. 134: 467-477.
33. Hedrick, P.W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73(Pt 4): 363-372.
34. Hewitt, J.K., Fulker, D.W. & Hewitt, C.A. 1983. Genetic architecture of olfactory discriminative avoidance conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Psychol. 97: 52-58.
35. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
36. Hughes, K.A. 1995. The inbreeding decline and average dominance of genes affecting male life-history characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 65: 41-52.
37. Imhof, M., Harr, B., Brem, G. & Schlotterer, C. 1998. Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 7: 915-917.
38. Isabel, G., Pascual, A. & Preat, T. 2004. Exclusive consolidated memory phases in Drosophila. Science 304: 1024-1027.
39. Joron, M. & Brakefield, P.M. 2003. Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424: 191-194.
40. Kaun, K.R., Chakaborty-Chatterjee, M. & Sokolowski, M.B. 2008. Natural variation in plasticity of glucose homeostasis and food intake. J. Exp. Biol. 211: 3160-3166.
41. Kawecki, T.J. & Mery, F. 2006. Genetically idiosyncratic responses of Drosophila melanogaster populations to selection for improved learning ability. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 1265-1274.
42. Keller, L.F. & Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230-241.
43. Kolss, M. & Kawecki, T.J. 2008. Reduced learning ability as a consequence of evolutionary adaptation to nutritional stress in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecol. Entomol. 33: 583-588.
44. Lacy, R.C. & Ballou, J.D. 1998. Effectiveness of selection in reducing the genetic load in populations of Peromyscus polionotus during generations of inbreeding. Evolution 52: 900-909.
45. Lande, R. & Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
46. Latter, B. & Sved, J.A. 1994. A reevaluation of data from competitive tests shows high levels of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 137: 509-511.
47. Latter, B.D., Mulley, J.C., Reid, D. & Pascoe, L. 1995. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 287-297.
48. Lofdahl, K.L., Holliday, M. & Hirsch, J. 1992. Selection for conditionability in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Psychol. 106: 172-183.
49. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, Sinauer, MA.
50. Lynch, M., Conery, J. & Hedrick, P.W. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146: 489-518.
51. Lyons, E.J., Frodsham, A.J., Zhang, L., Hill, A.V. & Amos, W. 2009. Consanguinity and susceptibility to infectious diseases in humans. Biol. Lett. 5: 574-576.
52. Mackay, T.F.C. 1985. A quantitative genetic analysis of fitness and its components in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 47: 59-70.
53. Margulis, S. 1998. Relationships among parental inbreeding, parental behaviour and offspring viability in oldfield mice. Anim. Behav. 55: 427-438.
54. Margulis, S.W. & Altmann, J. 1997. Behavioural risk factors in the reproduction of inbred and outbred oldfield mice. Anim. Behav. 54: 397-408.
55. Mariette, M., Kelley, J., Brooks, R. & Evans, J. 2006. The effects of inbreeding on male courtship behaviour and coloration in guppies. Ethology 112: 807-814.
56. Meffert, L. & Bryant, E. 1991. Mating propensity and courtship behavior in serially bottlenecked lines of the housefly. Evolution 45: 293-306.
57. Mery, F. & Kawecki, T.J. 2002. Experimental evolution of learning ability in fruit flies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 14274-14279.
58. Mery, F. & Kawecki, T.J. 2003. A fitness cost of learning ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270: 2465-2469.
59. Mery, F. & Kawecki, T.J. 2005. A cost of long-term memory in Drosophila. Science 308: 1148.
60. Mery, F., Belay, A.T., So, A.K., Sokolowski, M.B. & Kawecki, T.J. 2007a. Natural polymorphism affecting learning and memory in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 13051-13055.
61. Mery, F., Pont, J., Preat, T. & Kawecki, T.J. 2007b. Experimental evolution of olfactory memory in Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 80: 399-405.
62. Milkmann, R. & Zeitler, R.R. 1974. Concurrent multiple paternity in natural and laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 78: 1191-1193.
63. Miller, P.S., Glasner, J. & Hedrick, P.W. 1993. Inbreeding depression and male-mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 88: 29-36.
64. Neel, J.V., Schull, W.J., Yamamoto, M., Uchida, S., Yanase, T. & Fujiki, N. 1970. The effects of parental consanguinity and inbreeding in Hirado, Japan. II. Physical development, tapping rate, blood pressure, intelligence quotient, and school performance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 22: 263-286.
65. Ollivier, L. 2002. Éléments de Génétique Quantitative. INRA, Paris.
66. Peng, Y., Xi, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, K. & Guo, A. 2007. Experience improves feature extraction in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 27: 5139-5145.
67. Pusey, A. & Wolf, M. 1996. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 201-206.
68. Quinn, W.G. & Dudai, Y. 1976. Memory phases in Drosophila. Nature 262: 576-577.
69. Quinn, W.G., Harris, W.A. & Benzer, S. 1974. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71: 708-712.
70. Reid, J., Arcese, P., Cassidy, A.E.V., Marr, A., Smith, J.M. & Keller, L. 2005. Hamilton and Zuk meet heterozygosity? Song repertoire size indicates inbreeding and immunity in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) Proc. Biol. Sci. 272: 481-487.
71. Reif, M., Linsenmair, K.E. & Heisenberg, M. 2002. Evolutionary significance of courtship conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 63: 143-155.
72. Roff, D.A. 2002. Inbreeding depression: tests of the overdominance and partial dominance hypotheses. Evolution 56: 768-775.
73. Roff, D.A. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2007. The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J. Evol. Biol. 20: 433-447.
74. Rudan, I., Rudan, D., Campbell, H., Biloglav, Z., Urek, R., Padovan, M., Sibbett, L., Janicijevic, B., Narancic, N.S. & Rudan, P. 2002. Inbreeding and learning disability in Croatian island isolates. Coll. Antropol. 26: 421-428.
75. Rumball, W., Franklin, I.R., Frankham, R. & Sheldon, B.L. 1994. Decline in heterozygosity under full-sib and double first-cousin inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 136: 1039-1049.
76. Schull, W.J. & Neel, J.V. 1972. The effects of parental consanguinity and inbreeding in Hirado, Japan. V. Summary and interpretation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 24: 425-453.
77. Sharp, P.M. 1984a. The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106: 601-612.
78. Siegel, R.W. & Hall, J.C. 1979. Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76: 3430-3434.
79. Tempel, B.L., Bonini, N., Dawson, D.R. & Quinn, W.G. 1983. Reward learning in normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80: 1482-1486.
80. Tully, T., Preat, T., Boynton, S.C. & Del Vecchio, M. 1994. Genetic dissection of consolidated memory in Drosophila. Cell 79: 35-47.
81. Waddell, S. & Quinn, W.G. 2001. Neurobiology. Learning how a fruit fly forgets. Science 293: 1271-1272.
82. Wang, J.L., Hill, W.G., Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet. Res. 74: 165-178.
83. Weisfeld, G.E., Czilli, T., Phillips, K.A., Gall, J.A. & Lichtman, C.M. 2003. Possible olfaction-based mechanisms in human kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 85: 279-295.
84. Wright, S. 1921. Systems of mating. I. The biometric relations between parent and offspring. Genetics 6: 111-123.
85. Wright, S. 1934. Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. Am. Nat. 67: 24-53.
86. Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol 3, Experimental Results, and Evolutionary Deductions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
87. Yurkovic, A., Wang, O., Basu, A.C. & Kravitz, E.A. 2006. Learning and memory associated with aggression in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103: 17519-17524.
88. Ziehe, M. & Roberds, J.H. 1989. Inbreeding depression due to overdominance in partially self-fertilizing plant populations. Genetics 121: 861-868.