Predator-driven trait diversification in a dragonfly genus: Covariation in behavioral and morphological antipredator defense

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3327-3335

  Mikolajewski, Dirk J ^a,b   De Block, Marjan ^a   Rolff, Jens ^c   Johansson, Frank ^c   Beckerman, Andrew P ^c   Stoks, Robby ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Arginine kinase; Burst escape speed; Divergent selection; Phenotypic integration; Predation; Relaxed selection

Indexed keywords

ARGININE KINASE;

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DIVERGENCE; DRAGONFLY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FISH; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; LAKE; LARVA; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYLOGENETICS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREDATION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SELECTION; SWIMMING;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INSECT; LARVA; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ARGININE KINASE; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; INSECTS; LARVA; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SELECTION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANISOPTERA (DRAGONFLIES); LEUCORRHINIA; LEUCORRHINIA DUBIA;

EID: 77958570823     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01078.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Arnqvist, G., and F. Johansson 1998. Ontogenetic reaction norms of predator-induced defensive morphology in dragonfly larvae. Ecology 79:1847-1858.
2. Bolker, B., M. Holyoak, V. Krivan, L. Rowe, and O. Schmitz 2003. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101-1114.
3. Corbet, P. H. 1999. Dragonflies. Cornell Univ. Press, Cornell, USA
4. DeWitt, T. J., and R. B. Langerhans 2003. Mutiple prey traits, multiple predators: keys to understanding complex community dynamics. J. Sea Res. 49:143-155.
5. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
6. Hovmöller, R., and F. Johansson 2004. A phylogenetic perspective on larval spine morphology in Leucorrhinia (Odonata: Libellulidae) based on ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 rDNA sequences. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 30:653-662.
7. Johansson, F. 2002. Reaction norms and costs of plasticity of a predator induced morphological defence in a larval dragonfly (Leucorrhinia dubia: Odonata). Can. J. Zool. 80:944-950.
8. Johansson, F., and D. J. Mikolajewski 2008. Evolution of morphological defences. Pp. 127-138 in A. Córdoba-Aguilar, ed. Dragonflies & Damselflies: model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
9. Johansson, F., and L. Samuelsson 1994. Fish induced variation in abdominal spine length of Leucorrhinia dubia (Odonata) larvae. Oecologia 100:74-79.
10. Kishida, O., G. C. Trussell, A. Mougi, and K. Nishimura 2010. Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator-prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology. Popul. Ecol. 52:37-46.
11. Langerhans, R. B. 2009. Trade-off between steady and unsteady swimming underlies predator-driven divergence in Gambusia affinis. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1057-1075.
12. Langerhans, R. B., C. A. Layman, A. M. Shokrollahi, and T. J. DeWitt 2004. Predator-driven phenotypic diversification in Gambusia affinis. Evolution 58:2305-2318.
13. Marchinko, K. B. 2009. Predation's role in repeated phenotypic and genetic divergence of armor in threespine stickleback. Evolution 63:127-138.
14. McHenry, M. J., and S. N. Patek 2004. The evolution of larval morphology and swimming performance in Ascidians. Evolution 58:1209-1224.
15. McPeek, M. A. 1990. Behavioral differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology 71:1714-1726.
16. McPeek, M. A. 1999. Biochemical evolution associated with antipredator adaptation in damselflies. Evolution 53:1835-1845.
17. McPeek, M. A. 2000. Predisposed to adapt? Clade-level differences in characters affecting swimming performance in damselflies. Evolution 54:2072-2080.
18. McPeek, M. A., A. K. Schrot, and J. M. Brown 1996. Adaptation to predators in a new community: swimming performance and predator avoidance in damselflies. Ecology 77:617-629.
19. Mikolajewski, D. J., and F. Johansson 2004. Morphological and behavioral defenses in dragonfly larvae: trait compensation and cospecialization. Behav. Ecol. 15:614-620.
20. Mikolajewski, D. J., K. G. Leipelt, A. Conrad, S. Giere, and J. Weyer 2004. Schneller als gedacht: einjährige Larvalentwicklung und "slow life style" bei Leucorrhinia caudalis (Odonate: Libellulidae). Libellula 23:161-171.
21. Mikolajewski, D. J., F. Johansson, B. Wohlfahrt, and R. Stoks 2006. Invertebrate predation selects for the loss of a morphological antipredator trait. Evolution 60:1306-1310.
22. Mikolajewski, D. J., and J. Rolff 2004. Benefits of morphological defence demonstrated by direct manipulation in larval dragonflies. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6:619-626.
23. Mill, P. J., and R. S. Pickard 1975. Jet-propulsion in anisoptera dragonfly larvae. J. Comp. Physiol. 97:329-338.
24. Morrison, J. F. 1973. Arginine kinase and other invertebrate guanidine kinases. Pp. 457-486 in P. D. Boyer, ed. The enzymes volume VIII. Academic Press, New York, USA
25. Pajunen, V. I. 1962. Studies on the population ecology of Leucorrhinia dubia v.d. Linden. Ann. Zool. Soc. Zool. Bot. Fenn. Vanamo 24:1-79.
26. Peckarsky, B. L., P. A. Abrams, D. I. Bolnick, L. M. Dill, J. H. Grabowski, B. Luttbeg, J. L. Orrock, S. D. Peacor, E. L. Preisser, O. J. Schmitz, et al. 2008. Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interactions. Ecology 89:2416-2425.
27. Petrin, Z., E. G. Schilling, C. S. Loftin, and F. Johansson 2010. Predators shape distribution and promote diversification of morphological defenses in Leucorrhinia, Odonata. Evol. Ecol. DOI
28. Preisser, E. L., D. I. Bolnick, and M. F. Benard 2005. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86:501-509.
29. Purvis, A., and A. Rambaut 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC) - an Apple-Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comput. Appl. Biosci 11:247-251.
30. Reimchen, T. E., and P. Nosil 2002. Temporal variation in divergent selection on spine number in threespine stickleback. Evolution 56:2472-2483.
31. Relyea, R. A. 2000. Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81:2278-2289.
32. Relyea, R. A. 2004. Integrating phenotypic plasticity when death is on the line. Pp. 176-190 in M. Pigliucci and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
33. Richardson, J. M. L. 2001. The relative roles of adaptation and phylogeny in determination of larval traits in diversifying anuran lineages. Am. Nat. 157:282-299.
34. Richardson, J. M. L. 2002. A comparative study of phenotypic traits related to resource utilization in anuran communities. Evol. Ecol. 16:101-122.
35. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
36. Schluter, D. 2009. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323:737-741.
37. Schmitz, O. J., P. A. Hambäck, and A. P. Beckerman 2000. Trophic cascades in terrestrial sytems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. Am. Nat. 155:141-153.
38. Stoks, R., and M. De Block 2000. The influence of predator species and prey age on the immediate survival value of antipredator behaviours in a damselfly. Arch. Hydrobiol. 147:417-430.
39. Stoks, R., and M. A. McPeek 2006. A tale of two diversifications: reciprocal habitat shifts to fill ecological space along the pond permanence gradient. Am. Nat. 168:S50-S72.
40. Stoks, R., M. A. McPeek, and J. L. Mitchell 2003. Evolution of prey behavior in response to changes in predation regime: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes. Evolution 57:574-585.
41. Strobbe, F., M. A. McPeek, M. De Block, L. De Meester, and R. Stoks 2009. Survival selection on escape performance and its underlying phenotypic traits: a case of many-to-one mapping. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1172-1182.
42. Teplitsky, C., S. Plenet, J. P. Lena, N. Mermet, E. Malet, and P. Joly 2005. Escape behaviour and ultimate causes of specific induced defences in an anuran tadpole. J. Evol. Biol. 18:180-190.
43. Travis, J. 1989. The role of optimizing selection in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:279-296.
44. Turner, A. M., R. J. Bernot, and C. M. Boes 2000. Chemical cues modify species interactions: the ecological consequences of predator avoidance by freshwater snails. Oikos 88:148-158.
45. Vamosi, S. M. 2005. On the role of enemies in divergence and diversification of prey: a review and synthesis. Can. J. Zool. 83:894-910.
46. Walsh, P. T., J. R. Downie, and P. Monaghan 2008. Predation-induced plasticity in metamorphic duration in Xenopus laevis. Func. Ecol. 22:699-705.
47. Wellborn, G. A., D. K. Skelly, and E. E. Werner 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:337-363.